Kajjie wrote:
135. I usually score around 130 on IQ tests I take, but I've never taken one that's from a psychologist or Mensa - only ones from internet and tv that are probably less reliable.
I'm very sceptical about the validity of this one as nearly everyone who's replied has an IQ significantly above average.
Perhaps. But mabe the percentage that scored lower didn't want to post theirs.
People like to brag if they have something to brag about. Otherwise, what's the point?
But, I don't put any stock in any IQ tests anyway. Not even the "real" ones. The brain is complicated, far too much to analyze potential by a handful of multiple choice questions at any given time. The IQ test just compares your ability to determine their correct answers with others who have taken the test. So mabe you could be better or worse at figuring out those specific problems (which can be learned) than others, but how do you break down the thought process behind the problem solving? The simplist answer would be the person who aswered correctly the fastest is the smartest. I have a problem with that. That implies that intelligence is simple binary thought process, not an enormously complicated one. How many ways are there to solve a problem? Just one "correct" way? Is the person who is taking a few seconds longer to analyze many many more possibilities at the same time less intelligent? I say it's a very thorough and creative mind that comes up with perspectives and possiblities that are not immediately obvious. That may take a little more time. Or they may see a problem or a pattern in a totally different way that no one else has thought of. The human mind stands out because it is complex. You just can't approximate how complex a person's mind is by a simple 30 q test.