Are Aspies Superior?: A multi-faceted discussion

Page 7 of 8 [ 118 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

CoachMcGuirk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: Cupertino, CA

02 Aug 2008, 5:16 pm

No stake to break them, huh?

Or was the stake offered to you but you turned it down?



sim
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 512
Location: an uneven circle

02 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm

CoachMcGuirk wrote:
No stake to break them, huh?

Or was the stake offered to you but you turned it down?


Coach McGuirk, I'm a huge fan of your coaching techniques.



CoachMcGuirk
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: Cupertino, CA

02 Aug 2008, 5:23 pm

Yeah, I win all my games as a result of them.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

03 Aug 2008, 9:30 am

The prevalent opinion out there seems to be that people on the autism spectrum at the high functioning end, are neither superior nor inferior to NTs. But maybe the question is too broad. Isn't it obvious from all the discussion that NTs excell at certain things and autistics excell at other things? We need to look at specific skills....[and we need to be asking another very important question].

Let's look at social skills. We can make some conclusions within this one variable. There's little dispute that NTs are better at social skills. Social interaction usually gives them both confidence and happiness. Aspies, for whom social interaction is quite painful, may still find dozens of reasons to be happy. But on the social skills yardstick, NTs are superior.

Looking at the happiness parameter, NTs and Aspies being different but equal is a logical conclusion.

Let's look at the invention variable. Aspies in general have more time for invention due to the fact that they spend less time socially. Thinking about doing things in new and more efficient ways is probably more interesting to Aspies than to NTs. On the invention yardstick, Aspies are probably superior. But can we also conclde that Aspies are more creative [a larger category] than NTs? This requires further and more specific discussion.

To say we are equal or different or that we are just different isn't very useful to me. It's more useful to say in which areas NTs and Aspies are superior/inferior.

The reason this discussion is extremely significant is that NTs and Aspies can learn to respect each others' strengths. And that is a huge step forward from seeing the autism spectrum as only a hindrance to 'proper functioning'. The reality is that everyone who is making their best contribution is valuable and needed. Every one of us is remarkable in our own way. NTs who don't feel they are remarkable can be encouraged to do so. Aspies may need similar encouragement to communicate their strengths to the world at large.

How then can we help everyone to make their best contribution? This is the question that needs to be asked. And answered.



Sora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,906
Location: Europe

03 Aug 2008, 1:56 pm

FreedomG wrote:
Fine if I'm stupid, then you're the biggest ret*d here.


You do know that ret*d is an incredibly insulting term used like you did? Taking in the wide range of your insulting vocabulary you use, you do know. Do you have such a low opinion, taken from how you use this word, that equates people who score below 70-80 on a standardised IQ test and with a certain amount of self-help skill problems to something inferior that you think it can be used as an insult?

Why are you asking for opinions on the topic of superiority if you at the same time act as if you're superior to certain other groups of people?

Currently that is not exactly adding to that anybody takes you seriously. Small children already get taught that insulting and degrading behaviour towards others is extremely inappropriate as it shows no tolerance and an irrational and dangerous inclination towards lashing out at others in order to win.

So I wonder how why you think it's acceptable to behave like a big jerk that knows how to insult others in each and every sentence. Even your AS is no excuse for this sort of behaviour, especially if your debating superiority and inappropriateness of other people.


_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett


Hodor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 907
Location: England

03 Aug 2008, 5:47 pm

Smackerlacker wrote:
As for being religious... just exactly who isn't? Aside from the maybe 1% of the world population that's athiest?


Source?

Smackerlacker wrote:
And as far as evolution is concerned, your summation is basically correct. But here's the real question. If all the species are in a constant state of flux, then why is it that everyone and everything is so much the same? I've never seen a plant with eyeballs, or any animal with vocal chords.


Argument out of ignorance.

Evolution is not a quick process, don't assume that just because your knowledge of it is very scant that it is not true. Indeed, who has seen a plant with eyeballs, or an animal with vocal cords? Would they even need them? If plants somehow, against all logic, began to develop vision, they wouldn't just sprout eyes overnight. That's not how evolution works. So please, enough of the ridiculous comments. Not that this thread is exactly the pinnacle of human intelligence and reasoning to begin with. :?


_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."


natesmom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 631

03 Aug 2008, 6:30 pm

alba wrote:
But maybe the question is too broad. Isn't it obvious from all the discussion that NTs excell at certain things and autistics excell at other things? We need to look at specific skills....[and we need to be asking another very important question].

There's little dispute that NTs are better at social skills. on the social skills yardstick, NTs are superior.

Aspies in general have more time for invention due to the fact that they spend less time socially. Thinking about doing things in new and more efficient ways is probably more interesting to Aspies than to NTs. On the invention yardstick, Aspies are probably superior. But can we also conclde that Aspies are more creative [a larger category] than NTs? This requires further and more specific discussion.

NTs and Aspies can learn to respect each others' strengths. And that is a huge step forward from seeing the autism spectrum as only a hindrance to 'proper functioning'. The reality is that everyone who is making their best contribution is valuable and needed. Every one of us is remarkable in our own way.

How then can we help everyone to make their best contribution? This is the question that needs to be asked. And answered.


Well said! I as still teaching my husband social skills. Now we are working on nodding when someone is talking about something he feels is stupid and thinking of something to say like a question related to the topic. His eye contact has really improved.
Husband helps me with grammar, vocab and putting things together. I must say my 5 year old helps me more with fixing things and there is no doubt he is gifted and on the spectrum. We find out in two weeks if he is AS or HFA. My son has already invented little things. If I can't figure something out, I can go to him and he has at least two ideas. I also help him with social skills.



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,234

03 Aug 2008, 7:59 pm

natesmom wrote:
alba wrote:
But maybe the question is too broad. Isn't it obvious from all the discussion that NTs excell at certain things and autistics excell at other things? We need to look at specific skills....[and we need to be asking another very important question].

There's little dispute that NTs are better at social skills. on the social skills yardstick, NTs are superior.

Aspies in general have more time for invention due to the fact that they spend less time socially. Thinking about doing things in new and more efficient ways is probably more interesting to Aspies than to NTs. On the invention yardstick, Aspies are probably superior. But can we also conclde that Aspies are more creative [a larger category] than NTs? This requires further and more specific discussion.

NTs and Aspies can learn to respect each others' strengths. And that is a huge step forward from seeing the autism spectrum as only a hindrance to 'proper functioning'. The reality is that everyone who is making their best contribution is valuable and needed. Every one of us is remarkable in our own way.

How then can we help everyone to make their best contribution? This is the question that needs to be asked. And answered.


Well said! I as still teaching my husband social skills. Now we are working on nodding when someone is talking about something he feels is stupid and thinking of something to say like a question related to the topic. His eye contact has really improved.
Husband helps me with grammar, vocab and putting things together. I must say my 5 year old helps me more with fixing things and there is no doubt he is gifted and on the spectrum. We find out in two weeks if he is AS or HFA. My son has already invented little things. If I can't figure something out, I can go to him and he has at least two ideas. I also help him with social skills.


I was going to also say alba was dead on. Not insulting either way. :D

Natesmom,

It sounds like you, your husband, and son have a great relationship. :lol:

Sora,

he doesn't care, but isn't worth the time. :cry:

FreedomG,

You spoke of using an 80s movie, so I guess you meant ME. HEY, it was a big movie! JC Penny copied it in their LATEST commercials! Jesse Ventura is starting a new project, and compared it to TBC a few days ago. Granted, there IS a trend to use 20-30 year old material because it is forgotten, but they used the SAME concept. The movie was relevant here and, outside of the FAST acceptance, which IS possible because of the marijuana(or was it), and other fast pace was pretty true to life.

You know... I didn't think long enough about it! You ARE represented there! "Richard Vernon"! He thought HE was fantastic also, took joy in others failings, or perceived failings, and he wasn't all that great anyway.

As to the statement "I think I know who you are, the loser who got pushed around by his mother and his bratty sister. And it haunts him how he couldn't stand up for himself. "????? What mother and bratty sister? And nothing has haunted me regarding any forum exchange! As to the "bratty sister" reference, that WAS a quote!

I have only used this username, on this system, for its entire life.



anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,039

03 Aug 2008, 9:58 pm

Hodor wrote:
Smackerlacker wrote:
As for being religious... just exactly who isn't? Aside from the maybe 1% of the world population that's athiest?


Source?


Definitely higher than that.

Wikipedia says "A 2005 survey published in Encyclopædia Britannica finds that the non-religious make up about 11.9% of the world's population, and atheists about 2.3%. This figure does not include those who follow atheistic religions, such as some Buddhists."

And it cites this page:

http://search.eb.com/failedlogin?target ... le-9432620

Which requires a subscription, so I can't verify it directly. The footnote reads:

Worldwide Adherents of All Religions by Six Continental Areas, Mid-2005". Encyclopædia Britannica (2005). Retrieved on 2007-04-15.

* 2.3% Atheists: Persons professing atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious (opposed to all religion).
* 11.9% Nonreligious: Persons professing no religion, nonbelievers, agnostics, freethinkers, uninterested, or dereligionized secularists indifferent to all religion but not militantly so.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


Mxzysptlik
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 102

08 Jul 2012, 4:06 am

I don't feel superhuman. And I don't think Aspies are special. The reason why we are the way we are is because we have to be in order to survive. If we were not logical we would end up dead or something because we are incapable, to some extinct, of acting on instinct. We are not superhuman, we possess a neurological disorder. Right now I'm studying Calculus...for fun! Most people would not spend their time doing this because they would rather be f***ing their gf or going out to the movies or whatever. I love my autism, but I hate it when people say Aspies are somehow superior. By what measure? I feel like we all have a place in this world, and our place seems to be in a lab, in a book, or in a game or something idk. People should be valued for who they are and not who you want them to be. It's been hard for me to accept this view of the world because in many ways I wanted to pay back all those bastards in high school that made me feel like sh**, but then I realized that A) that's childish B) they were dumb kids and C) that doing that to someone else will only cause more misery and pain. Stop trying to put yourself above people and just learn to accept people and their "flaws".



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

08 Jul 2012, 4:17 am

In some ways yes like our obsessions and talents in certain areas but in other ways no we might not be good at otherstuff like most NT^s are like for me math but I am awsome in science. Also NTs are better at socializing than we are generally and have more confidence.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Gnonymouse
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 145

08 Jul 2012, 8:55 am

Mxzysptlik wrote:
I don't feel superhuman. And I don't think Aspies are special. The reason why we are the way we are is because we have to be in order to survive. If we were not logical we would end up dead or something because we are incapable, to some extinct, of acting on instinct. We are not superhuman, we possess a neurological disorder. Right now I'm studying Calculus...for fun! Most people would not spend their time doing this because they would rather be f***ing their gf or going out to the movies or whatever. I love my autism, but I hate it when people say Aspies are somehow superior. By what measure? I feel like we all have a place in this world, and our place seems to be in a lab, in a book, or in a game or something idk. People should be valued for who they are and not who you want them to be. It's been hard for me to accept this view of the world because in many ways I wanted to pay back all those bastards in high school that made me feel like sh**, but then I realized that A) that's childish B) they were dumb kids and C) that doing that to someone else will only cause more misery and pain. Stop trying to put yourself above people and just learn to accept people and their "flaws".


I totally agree and can relate.

WrongPlanet really needs an upvote system...



CyborgUprising
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,963
Location: auf der Fahrt durch Niemandsland

08 Jul 2012, 9:08 am

I do not believe in the idea of superiority no mattwhat the premise is. To think we are superior is no different than certain religious or racial groups thinking they are superior. Equality would be nice, but that cannot exist when someone feels they occupy a higher social status than others.