Slowmutant, it's generally pretty obvious to most people that being a sociopathic killer is bad. I'd say it's pretty much a universal thought in the human mind except, of course, in those who are sociopaths.
"Dexter" is simply entertainment, which some people actually enjoy. It certainly doesn't mean that we condone those acts in real life.
As a special effects make-up artist working in Hollywood, I have an interest in certain aspects of the show, especially considering that one of my friends made the bodies and the ice block with fingertips inside for the first season (The ice-block is really freakin heavy). I can tell you that it actually made him nauseous to sculpt the drowning victims for an episode, because he had to look at pictures of real drowning victims, which he ended up toning down on the sculpts, so that people wouldn't have the same reaction.
slowmutant wrote:
The inference would be that all Aspies are sociopathic killers.
Your idea that the act of acknowledging that certain characteristics of a sociopath are aspie-ish would then infer that all aspies are sociopathic killers, is simply ridiculous. It's a logical fallacy known as "affirming the consequent."
You assume that B implies A on the basis that A implies B. In other words, you assume that people would believe that having aspie-like qualities(B) would imply that a person is a sociopath(A) if it's admitted that being a sociopath(A) could lead to a person having aspie-like qualities(B). In reality, there are many other conditions that could lead to a person having aspie qualities, and I think that the general public has enough intelligence to realize this.
It's like saying that because I have a fever, I must have the flu, because when I have the flu, I have a fever (When, in reality, there are many other conditions that can cause a high fever).