Autistics Have Better Vision Than Birds of Prey
Ambivalence
Veteran
Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,613
Location: Peterlee (for Industry)
I agree, there's no point comparing numbers taken under different setups, everyone should use 4m distance. I suppose that given the number of variables involved with the setup - all the different screens and ambient light - that the most reliable way to test it would be for many people to use one set of equipment.
_________________
No one has gone missing or died.
The year is still young.
Penelope_asparagus
Blue Jay
Joined: 9 Feb 2005
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 87
Location: San Francisco California
I agree, there's no point comparing numbers taken under different setups, everyone should use 4m distance. I suppose that given the number of variables involved with the setup - all the different screens and ambient light - that the most reliable way to test it would be for many people to use one set of equipment.
Set your screen resolution to be the same as everyone else. Problem solved.
And the most important thing to correct for on the contrast one is to calibrate the gamma value. You can ignore the rest I think.
The others: just measure the screen and how far back you are.
Didn't take the test, but I really can see (using glasses) better than anyone I know. People can't believe how I can read that very little letters of PDFs on my PDA, or how could I read something that is very distant (they need to go very near the place to check cause they don't believe me).
But it could be genetics, my father was the best shooter at the time he was in army.
_________________
I talk to myself because I like dealing with a better class of people. - Tartakower
AmberEyes
Veteran
Joined: 26 Sep 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,438
Location: The Lands where the Jumblies live
I like the acronym ASC.
I'm going to be using the word "condition" from now on because I find the word "disorder" very upsetting and offensive. I'm actually afraid to seek help because of this "disorder" word and all the stigma that surrounds it.
I am not "disordered": I'm a human being.
Lots of people have said that I'm capable of doing things and I can produce the evidence if need be.
They never thought I was "disordered" at all: the opposite actually.
I could accept that I have a genetic condition, if need be, and be able to work within the social limitations of my personality.
_________________
?Be like the Raggy Dolls and say I just don?t care.?
- Neil Innes.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Research Priorities of autistics studied |
10 Feb 2024, 4:20 pm |