Russian army has invaded the Crimea
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,901
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The people of the Crimea have the same right as self-determination as anyone else. You have to assume that the CIA amongst others probably have their fingers all over this coup in Ukraine they've basically admitted as much in leaked phone calls. The snipers Yanukovych supposedly used against protestors appear to have to been hired by the opposition as to serve as provocateurs, the whole thing is a sham. The media is cancer, they've been pumping us full of anti-Russian propaganda for months now.
American conservatives have the recurring nightmare that the Latino populace in the southwest will want to rejoin Mexico if they are allowed to become the majority. Say if that impossible scenario were to happen, would America honestly let it just because Latino southwesterners wanted to practice self determination?
And to blame the media for the ethnic unrest in Ukraine is simplistic and naive. The tension between Russians and Ukrainians has been going on for a very long time, and hardly needed the media to stir the fires.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,901
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The thing is, by doing as they actually do (invading foreign countries to "protect" russian minorities in them), Russia is actually favoring, that ethnic cleansing will be happening again in the future.
Before second worldwar, that "protection" of minorities, was as well used as excuse to engage into foreign countries politics. In the end it leaded to countries simply ending any risc of that happening again, by pushing that minorities out.
Armenian minorities could become a threat again for the turkian country? - Lets wipe them out, no problem with that ever again.
German minorities could become a threat again for Czechian and polish country? - Lets wipe them out, no problem with that ever again.
By engaging into that kind of behavior again (using minorities as reason to engage in military ways), you create as well reasons again for people to wipe out such minority populations. As well that it creates resistance in people, to allow foreign people to settle down. Certain areas of Berlin are as well dominated by turkian people. Does that mean, that turkian military has the right to engage there, anyway if the majority of the affected citizens of that area want it or not? O_o
That was the fate of my Black Sea German relatives under Stalin. They had been ethnically cleansed in the Crimea and the adjacent areas, and deported to Siberia and Kazakhstan, along with the Crimean Tatars. And surprise, surprise, Stalin replaced them with the grandparents of the Russians living in the Crimea today.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
The Crimea was given to Ukraine from Russia in 1954 by Nikita Khrushchev who was Ukrainian himself who I am sure never imagined the unbreakable USSR would indeed do just that. I think the people of the Crimea should have the same right to self-determination as those in Kiev, if they want to join Russia then what argument can anyone have against that? I can't see how you can support the popular will behind certain revolutions but then decry about territorial integrity and the legality of the process about other ones unless you have your own agenda which the American media and government obviously do. The snipers in the Maidan were actually hired by the protest leaders, that should tell you quite a bit about the people that are in control in now.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,901
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
But will Putin stop with the Crimea? Defending the Russian populace there is nothing more than just a pretext to grabbing up territory in order to rebuild the Russian empire. After all, Putin has said Ukraine isn't a real country, but just a province of Russia.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
No, it's much more complicated. The guy who was ousted by these rebels, President Viktor Yanukovych, voted against a step that would bring Ukraine closer to joining the EU in favor of the Russian trade unions. This upset the western Ukrainians and it is rumored their paramilitary trained in the EU. Basically, the EU is trying to dismantle the country and take away it's financial power.
President Viktor Yanukovych fled to Russia and the EU has just had his assets frozen, most likely in an attempt to keep the conflict from becoming bloodier. To freeze an ousted leader's assets is strange when your consider he was illegally removed from power according to his country's constitution.
The entire nation is heavily dependent upon Russia for it's existence.
The question remains, why is the west, and now China, trying to stir Russia over a country that is pretty much Russian now? It is very odd. What we are looking at might be covert evil right under our noses. True example of underground forces of disruption and destruction at work happening right before our eyes, daily. Weird.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,901
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Oh the Ukrainians despise the Russians. The Russian once killed Ukrainians with famine as their weapon of choice. So, they do need protecting from the Russians if history tells us anything.
When you hear US and China blah blah blahing about territorial integrity of Ukraine, you have to wonder, how is it possible considering the sentiment of these Ukrainians? Would it ever work? That's where US and China are lost on the situation.
And there was no provocation in Crimea. Putin is telling a series of outrageous lies because he can. According to him Russia is fully justified because of x,y,z....and yet Russian troops aren't even there according to Putin. He's speaking to his low information Russian Archie Bunker base and he can say pretty much anything without fear of a pointed question. He can create any pretext he wants or just claim there was a pretext after the fact. It's just down to what he wants to happen.
The provocation was in Kiev in the form of the coup backed by the West with Nazi shock troops; the Nazis now run the Defence Ministry, the Defence Council, the police and the office of chief prosecutor. That in and of itself is provocation. What about the language law that was passed first thing? The West interfered in Ukraine in the name of their rank imperialism and used Nazis as shock troops to that end; they are the problem and the original sinners in this crisis.
Not ethnic Russians, ethnic Ossetians, Ossetians being one of the peoples of the Russian Federation.
The acting president of Ukraine is a Baptist from a moderate party. The acting Prime Minister is a Jew. The parliament is the same as before and unanimously impeached the former President. There will be new elections in May. A few right wing people are in certain posts but that's very far from the whole government.
The language issue is an ongoing struggle over a law passed in 2012 in favor of regional languages. The new President vetoed the effort to set aside the 2012 law so in fact nothing has changed at all. He says they'll look at the issue again once they find a balanced solution.
Meanwhile Putin won't even admit that his troops are surrounding Ukrainian bases.
If non governmental protesters can bring down the national government, then elected regional protesters should be able to overthrow themselves.
Taking over the whole country by protest is approved, but not the provinces?
Massa Obama yells about International Law, but does not give a link to it.
Czechoslovakia did split, and Yugoslavia did in a hostile manner.
No International Glue Law was applied.
Kurdistan is recent, and another was proposed in Syria, Al Kiadastan.
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary, it happens.
Partition or civil war. What is the lessor evil?
Revolutions happen. That's the world. But sending in soldiers without markings to try to steal your neighbor's territory has traditionally been frowned upon. And it's quite natural that other nations will make a stink. Maybe even enjoy making one. Putin is a big boy and will have to endure it. You don't have to cry for him. He doesn't care.
When a foreign power surrounds your army bases with soldiers, orders your naval ships to surrender and then blocks another portion of your fleet up by scuttling a wreck in the bay, well, those are acts of war. They will always be acts of war. It also seems clear to me that Russia wants to take as much of the Ukrainian fleet as possible. Putin has said that the dissolution of the Soviet Union was the 20th century's greatest tragedy and I think he wants his boats back, as well as some land and the port.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Putin Admits He Invaded Ukraine "to impress Jodie Foster" |
02 Apr 2024, 2:48 pm |
Is it reasonable to conscript the unemployed in the army? |
30 May 2024, 12:32 am |
Secret army of women who broke Nazi codes get recognition |
23 Apr 2024, 8:35 pm |
Shadowy Russian actors spread Princess Kate conspiracies |
28 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm |