Is there any proof God exists?

Post Reply New Topic

1 minute after his death or 100 years after is death, it makes no difference. What is important is that you have a reliable chain of narrators.

Remember boys and girls if we don't sin then Jesus died for nothing!

Well dude, with 'common sense' you will Know NOW that even at a round table discussion, as oral tradition, a Flying Spaghetti Monster CAN become a MagicK Blue Turtle on the first turn of A round table OF Gossip; not necessarily GOSPEL TRUTH.

And that is precisely what oral tradition is; Gossip;

TRUE OR NOT OR 'GOSPEL' OR NOT IN TRUTH AND LIGHT;

IF YOU MULTIPLY THAT by 40 years of oral tradition you get the 'common sense';

or YOU DO NOT;

AND tHere is a place that no one
can help
you
but
you;
PERIOD;
END OF STORY.

IF THE HISTORICAL JESUS IS ALIVE IN
ELECTRONIC SERVING INTERNET
BLOGGING DAYS
NOW;

PROBLEM SOLVED;

NOW..

OR
NOT..

FOR YOU..

That's why you only take from trustworthy and reliable narrators, because they don't gossip.

OMG FRIEND..! common sense! please..please..please...COMMON SENSE!..

NONE OF US, AND I DO MEAN NONE OF 'US', NOW,
ARE ALIVE THE FIRST 40 YEARS AFTER THE DEATH OF JESUS;
SO NO ONE NOW, LITERALLY KNOWS NOW, ANY NARRATOR
LITERALLY THEN, OF ORAL TRADITION,

ASSOCIATED WITH JESUS, NOW.

CAN YOU POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND THAT...!

OH GOD YOU are frustrating;

But I'm not frustrated..

AS I KNOW YOU

NOW;

AS IS,
WRITTEN HERE,
IN LIMITED
TEXT..

Are you for real. Read your scriptures again, they are all over the show. Have a look at the various narratives concerning the tomb, all have different people, stones rolled aside, stones in place, one woman, three women, no women, before sunset, in the morning, and on and on. http://www.answering-christianity.com/contra_res.htm

It is clearly a made up narrative to explain why Jesus, who claimed that the apocalypse was about to occur and that he would be anointed the son of man, and his twelve disciples would rule the twelve tribes under him, was killed by crucifixion.

True but the original post asked not for proof of God, simply it asks is there any evidence. So far all those claiming God have produced zero evidence.

Well not exactly, I think you believe what you are saying so in that context you are not lying. However you provide NO evidence other than the short vid of you pressing weights. Human memory and perception is a very unstable and inaccurate thing.

First up you are presenting yourself as evidence for the existence of God. This claim cannot be taken at face value. And it would appear that you are making several unjustified assumptions

1. That you were diagnosed correctly
2. That it is impossible for homeostasis to kick in and reverse the illnesses you were suffering from
3. That you recovered is due to the intervention of some kind of god.

Also you make claims such as "and dance walk a martial arts ballet style of dance" and that you are a legendary dancer there are more claims but these two you can verify with footage. There is also mention of other deft and butterfly like abilities you can post them to if you like

Dear Arthur, how many frigging times do I have to tell you that I am a free verse poet
who is heavily into the art of WRITING metaphor.

SPECIAL INTEREST.

PERIOD.

CAPICE?

I believe in an all natural GOD and ALL NATURAL HUMAN POTENTIAL
THAT CAN BE ACCESSED THROUGH
INNATE INSTINCT AND INTUITION.

THAT'S ALL REAL DUDE.

AND I'M NOT SAYING MY ALL REAL NATURAL HUMAN MIRACLES OTHERWISE KNOWN IN MY BOOK AS EXCELLING IN HUMAN POTENTIAL EXCEEDS THE HIGHER LEVELS OF OTHER FOLK'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS, IN TOTALLY related OR UNRELATED DISCIPLINES OF MIND AND BODY BALANCE, IN GREATER HUMAN POTENTIAL.

BUT NEVER THE LESS, WHAT I CAN DO NOW IS COOL, AND OBSERVED BY OTHERS IN REAL FLESH AND BLOOD LIFE, AS TRULY IMPRESSIVE IN MEETING HIGHER LEVELS OF HUMAN POTENTIAL, WHICH AGAIN, IS WHAT I METAPHOR, AS ALL NATURAL HUMAN MIRACLES.

GOD, I HOPE THIS IS CLEAR NOW FOR YOU;

AS I AM CERTAINLY DOING MY BEST TO DO JUST THAT
FOR JUST
YOU,
PLEASE..

AND I'VE FRIGGING ALREADY PROVIDED LINKS TO MY DANCE TIME AND TIME AGAIN
HERE, FOR EVIDENCE, ALL EASILY FOUND IN THE NEXT TO LAST POST OF MY BLOG,
FOR NOW.

The moderators here, get tired of me providing THAT EVIDENCE OVER AND OVER,
SO THEY SPANK MY HAND, SO I CAN NO LONGER PROVIDE THAT EVIDENCE,
directly as such, here.

AND THAT'S OKAY, AS ALL I AM ATTEMPTING TO DO HERE,
IS TO SHOW FOLKS THAT
THEY TOO,
CAN BE
AS
FREE AS ME;

IF THEY ARE COURAGEOUS
ENOUGH TO DO WHATEVER
THEY WILL TO DO, TO BE FREE!..

Additionally, Arthur, for 'you' who probably do not lift any big weights; just guessing; I'm not sure.

If 'you' do a 'little research' on the big YOUTUBE INTERNET YOU WILL not find anyone doing 14 slow leg presses on a STRAIGHT ALSO KNOWN AS PARALLEL LEG PRESS LIKE ME, with their arms raised up with 930LBS 'CAUSE IT IS MUCH HARDER than the run of the mill, 45 degree leg press machines, where steroid heads press up to 2300 LBS on those machines, per record by Ronnie Coleman, a previous Mr Universe winner who is pumped up big time on the juice of anabolic steroids.

But anyway, the twins here can explain more of that in 'bodybuilder language' if you like, for that.



Caution, the F word is part of 'REAL' body-builder language; like that or not..

They have a hard enough time, by their own words, on a machine like this with 400LBS...

Need I say more...

Dude, you have no idea what I do, per the gravity and intensity of it; 'cause 'you' do not have a clue
of the specialities of human potential that I do excel in, in amazing human potential.

'Your' suggestion that IT is no big deal,

is the most ignorant thing I have heard, all year long, starting IN January, at least...

Other folks says 'HOLY SH**', under their breath, Or OUT LOUD, as I've already evidenced here too,
by video and female gym attendant, in another You Tube video, 'only' at 810LBS, then,
WHO KNOWS WHAT THE F I AM DOING, AT THE GYM, and
ain't ever ever ever ever seen a big bulked up
twenty-something year old Marine, do near half
as much as I can do, at my elite
MILITARY INSTALLATION
U.S.A. GYM.

When I 'walk on water',
'you' still will not believe
in GOD; and that's Okay;
as folks like 'you' can be
a lost cause through all
the ages of human history
when it comes to believing
in what TRULY CAN BE........

AND TO BE CLEAR THE WATER
THINGY, IS ANOTHER METAPHOR
DUDE.. 'JUST' LIKE IN 'JESUS LAND...

2'..

Ever played "telephone"?
It is nearly impossible to transfer a short message, spoken, trough a chain of 5 people over the span of a few minutes, sitting in the same room.
Now try the same thing over dozens of years, 100's of people, stories branching and remerging a lot later; i'd be surprized if even the summary was over 20% accurate, let alone the details...

That's why people write things down that they want to remember.

They do now, but around the year zero, very few people could write, so there was a long line of 'telephone' before it was written down.
And let's not forget that those records have since been copied, updated and translated many times over, even after the initial oral relays...
The Dead Sea Scrolls are sort-of original, so a lot more useful than the modernised records, but they still hold the initial problems that they aren't first witness accounts

also, sophisticated asked for reliable, i forgot to ask how we'd know who they were...
written records from that time period are just not reliable as evidence, as much as we'd want them to be

So we ASSUME the gospel writers couldn't write? Or couldn't least dictate their experiences to those who could?


MANY times? Really? Admittedly I've purposefully limited myself to about 3 English Bible translations, 4 if you count the Authorized King James. They all derive from the earliest available Masoretic manuscripts and manuscripts from outside the Masorete tradition, including but not limited to the Septuagint (which some speculate to have been based on an earlier Hebrew source than the now more accepted Masoretic). The NT came from Greek sources that date back as early as the 2nd century, and 1st century fragments DO exist which indicate that the gospels were already widely distributed even then.


What do you mean by "first witness"? It seems we no longer have "first witnesses" of World War I. Therefore, WWI never happened.


Uh oh…moving goalposts...

What I'm saying is that every narrative must be supported with a strong chain of reporters.

If those 5 people have a poor memory, then yeah it is impossible.