Was Ayn Rand a psychopath?
2 glib and superficial charm
2 grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self
2 need for stimulation
? pathological lying
2 cunning and manipulativeness
2 lack of remorse or guilt
2 shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness)
2 callousness and lack of empathy
? parasitic lifestyle
1 poor behavioral controls
2 sexual promiscuity
? early behavior problems
1 lack of realistic long-term goals
1 impulsivity
1 irresponsibility
2 failure to accept responsibility for own actions
1 many short-term marital relationships
? juvenile delinquency
0 revocation of conditional release
? criminal versatility
SCORE = 24
When properly completed by a qualified professional [edit anyone on the internet], the PCL-R provides a total score that indicates how closely the test subject matches the "perfect" score that a classic or prototypical psychopath would rate. Each of the twenty items is given a score of 0, 1, or 2 based on how well it applies to the subject being tested. A prototypical psychopath would receive a maximum score of 40, while someone with absolutely no psychopathic traits or tendencies would receive a score of zero. A score of 30 or above qualifies a person for a diagnosis of psychopathy. People with no criminal backgrounds normally score around 5. Many non-psychopathic criminal offenders score around 22.
Answer no Ayn Rand is not apparently a Sociopath just a horrible person.
Unless some of those ?s should be 2s.
Does anyone no if she was a Juvenile Delinquent or a Pathological liar ?
Considering I am currently at (total) war with JakobVirgil in another thread it would be against my self interest to support him, but this post makes the point. Psychopathy might be some loose term to most people, but it has been the subject of substantial research (including top tier scientific journals like Science, Nature and PNAS) for decades. Robert Hare's PCL-R remains the predominant scale for determining psychopathy, although David Cooke has some (in my opinion relevant) objections against the PCL-R. However, since I lack the capability of providing a realistic alternative, I will stick to the current establishment...
We are fighting but you know I still love you right?
Under Cooke and Michie, Ayn would be a sociopath because they remove the criminality component which is were Ms. Rosenbaum ducked the diagnosis.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Giftorcurse
Veteran
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,887
Location: Port Royal, South Carolina
I just like fighting....
Regardless, I doubt that Ayn Rand came anywhere close to being a psychopath. The impulsive aspect (type 2) doesn't make authorship easy....
Stupid, on the other hand...
It is better to be feared than loved... I mean, if Old Nick said it, then it must be true...
Maybe there is nothing quite a mad as a martyr, what's wrong with altruism? What's wrong with caring about the least among us? In the end, if not in the eyes of God, then in the eyes of your fellow man, you have a higher standing than the selfish and self centered.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
We are born with an ego. If we did not care about ourselves we would not survive physically. If we did not care for ourselves our dependent children would not survive physically. Having working ego is a condition of survival.
Having an oversize ego, however, can be a problem.
R. Hillel said it best:
If I am not for myself, who is for me?
If I am only for myself, what am I?
If not now, then when?
Perke Avot I-15
ruveyn
I don't have the attention span for philosophy anymore, but I always thought Libertarians that followed John Stuart Mill argued that enlightened self interest was always best, and those that followed Ayn Rand left out the enlightened bit. My sympathies are with those in the Mill tradition.
Regardless, I doubt that Ayn Rand came anywhere close to being a psychopath. The impulsive aspect (type 2) doesn't make authorship easy....
....
By authorship you mean because she was a writer?
I think successful psycopaths like really good looking high functioning aspies are harder to diagnose.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Not at all. There is nothing psychopathic about rational selfishness. I have been practicing it for over half my life and I am as sane and as in touch with reality as an pinko stinko commie loving liberal altruist.
Christians who die for Christ are probably more crazy than those who prefer to stay a live.
There is nothing quite as mad as a martyr.
ruveyn
Reason alone cannot inform a person on ultimate values. Reason is descriptive, not normative. People who value altruism and fairness are no less rational than those who value "rational selfishness". Ayn Rand's opinion that self-sacrifice is foolish and unreasonable is silly because altruists and selfish individualists aim for different ends. Both are acting reasonably to the degree that they fulfill their own ultimate values. Reason itself can only inform one on the means to obtain an end. Ends themselves are outside the realm of objective description. The person that labels a martyr a fool only does so because he/she lacks insight onto the motives of people who do not value the same ends that he/she values. The claims of objectivists are idiotic and consist of purely circular reasoning and/or plain old assertions. Randomly adding qualifiers like "rational" and "objective" is just manipulative linguistic sophistry. It's the exact same trick that religions use to lay claim to foundational normative truths. If objectivism is so opposed to religion then why does it make claims the exact same way that religions do? Ayn Rand was an idiot. Objectivism is objective in the way Scientology is scientific.
Regardless, I doubt that Ayn Rand came anywhere close to being a psychopath. The impulsive aspect (type 2) doesn't make authorship easy....
....
By authorship you mean because she was a writer?
I think successful psycopaths like really good looking high functioning aspies are harder to diagnose.
My scepticism towards labelling Rand (or a lot of people, for that matter) as a a psychopath stems from the fact that the PCL-R consists of two dimensions: A callous/unemotional trait and an impulsive trait. The impulsive trait makes it unlikely that a person would be able to sit down and actually write a book on moral philosophy and epistemology.
I have no knowledge of the first trait considering Ayn Rand, but I assume that actual assessments may be influenced by the political views of the observer..
The idea that the achievers would run off to smoke and hang out on a commune was a little silly.
She became a den mother to a set of strange folks and losers.
ruveyn
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,242
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
I think with Ayn Rand it was the very specifics of her upbringing and experiences - ie. the things that she saw and what (as well as who) she was informed by were somewhat eccentric.
What she gives though is something like the north pole of libertarianism. Her views were *pretty close* to an absolute which means that people can - in engaging her ethics - see both the upsides and pitfalls of such beliefs but they can see it somewhat accurately because she was no BS about it.
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
Maybe there is nothing quite a mad as a martyr, what's wrong with altruism? What's wrong with caring about the least among us? In the end, if not in the eyes of God, then in the eyes of your fellow man, you have a higher standing than the selfish and self centered.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
We are born with an ego. If we did not care about ourselves we would not survive physically. If we did not care for ourselves our dependent children would not survive physically. Having working ego is a condition of survival.
Having an oversize ego, however, can be a problem.
R. Hillel said it best:
If I am not for myself, who is for me?
If I am only for myself, what am I?
If not now, then when?
Perke Avot I-15
ruveyn
How does having a compassion for ones fellow man disqualify us from having care for ourselves?
That dichotomy doesnt register with me.
Personally, I am altruist BECAUSE of my self serving nature. I want to have the spoils that can come about from equality.
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland