Page 6 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next


What was Jesus' sexual orientation?
Heterosexual 25%  25%  [ 22 ]
Bisexual 9%  9%  [ 8 ]
Homosexual 14%  14%  [ 12 ]
Asexual 31%  31%  [ 27 ]
Auto-sexual (masturbation only) 2%  2%  [ 2 ]
Bestiality 11%  11%  [ 10 ]
Other (specify 7%  7%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 87

Tim_Tex
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 45,538
Location: Houston, Texas

18 Sep 2012, 11:03 pm

I would think he was asexual.


_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!

Now proficient in ChatGPT!


nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

18 Sep 2012, 11:39 pm

This story just came out:

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/18/fragment-suggests-jesus-was-married/


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute


AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

18 Sep 2012, 11:55 pm

Pileo wrote:
This opens the possibility that some people are descended from Jesus Christ. Wouldn't that be wicked? The downside to this news is that Dan Brown's ego just grew to dangerous proportions.

AspieOtaku wrote:
That would be a twist if he was bisexual and was crucified for coming on to Judas and Judas was a homophobe and decided to turn Jesus in to the Romans.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the Romans okay with homosexuality at the time? I was under the impression the Romans didn't develop homophobia until after the rise of the Roman Catholic Church.
You are correct however I was implying Judas was not the Romans.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


MagicToenail
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 401

19 Sep 2012, 12:32 am

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Well?........

As far as we know, Jesus never kissed a girl, but he did kiss Judas Iscariot.

Jesus never married, which would have been unusual for a Jewish boy at the time.

He may have been influenced by Greek culture, where homosexuality among men was normal.


Speculating about whether Jesus was queer makes as much sense as asking if Sam had the hots for Frodo.

ruveyn


But we kind of know the answer for Sam/Frodo. Tolkien was a rather straight laced Catholic and would probably be horrified by slash fiction.



MagicToenail
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 401

19 Sep 2012, 12:35 am

I'd say asexual because of Matthew 19:12 For some are eunuchs because they were born that way; others were made that way by men; and others have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."



Pileo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 523

19 Sep 2012, 12:35 am

AspieOtaku wrote:
Pileo wrote:
This opens the possibility that some people are descended from Jesus Christ. Wouldn't that be wicked? The downside to this news is that Dan Brown's ego just grew to dangerous proportions.

AspieOtaku wrote:
That would be a twist if he was bisexual and was crucified for coming on to Judas and Judas was a homophobe and decided to turn Jesus in to the Romans.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the Romans okay with homosexuality at the time? I was under the impression the Romans didn't develop homophobia until after the rise of the Roman Catholic Church.
You are correct however I was implying Judas was not the Romans.


My bad. I misread your post.



JellyCat
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 1 Sep 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 338
Location: U.K.

19 Sep 2012, 4:51 am

He's thought to have had a wife. They've recently found papyrus which have quotes from Jesus talking about her on them.



enrico_dandolo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 866

19 Sep 2012, 8:31 am

nominalist wrote:

ArrantPariah brought it up.

This article is much better than the other, but the title is still wrong.



YippySkippy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,986

19 Sep 2012, 10:16 am

Sam had the hots for Rosie Cotton, duh.
How Frodo felt is anyone's guess.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

19 Sep 2012, 12:05 pm

YippySkippy wrote:
Sam had the hots for Rosie Cotton, duh.
How Frodo felt is anyone's guess.


Yeah, but Rosie's back in the Shire, Sam. And I'm right here...


_________________
--James


aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

19 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm

Quote:
The text, written in Coptic and probably translated from a 2nd century Greek text, contains a dialogue in which Jesus refers to "my wife," whom he identifies as Mary.


read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-09-harvard-je ... nized.html



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

19 Sep 2012, 2:17 pm

After thousands of years of Christians even denying themselves the pleasure of masturbation, I find it funny to have found something which demonstrates that Jesus wasn't asexual after all.



rosemund
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 125
Location: South East Texas

19 Sep 2012, 2:41 pm

I can't believe I didn't find this thread before. This is one of my special interests, so...

@Panda Yes, as a Hebrew man it would have been expected that Jesus be married, and have a family. If you did not do this by the time you were in your early twenties, you could be condemned (turned on basically/cold shoulder, but not stoned). Also, it very well might have been counterproductive for Jesus to be married, because there is evidence that suggests his true mission was not to be The Christ(os), but instead a military leader.

Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist. At that time, to be baptized by someone was to become their follower. This is not supposition. That was the accepted form of acknowledging them as your teacher, and that you were their follower. John's followers believed that he was The Christ, and he continually questioned Jesus about this in the NT. Jesus does not come out and say he is The Christ, which only leads to further unrest in John. Eventually, Salome wants John's head on a platter, because she is granted a wish at the infamous dinner party, and that's what her mother tells her to ask for. Jesus had already become well established in John's fold, and a certain partisan aspect had sprung up. John is thrown into prison, and Jesus never rescues him. For that matter, Herod was only too happy to imprison John and have him killed, because he continually addresses his issue with being "fearful" of John, something he Never says about Jesus. So, with John dead, Jesus can take over. There is also speculation that John's head was a source of actual power, but that's for a discussion about the Knight's Templar if you want to get into it that deeply.

The feast of the loaves and fishes...only men partook of that, and well outside the city, so it is acknowledged by scholars that the purpose might have been to discuss a military coup against the Romans.

It is never clearly stated that Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene on the lips. Some of the text is missing, and that has been the leading supposition on what was once written in that section. He does kiss Judas. Some gnostics believed he did spend the night with the young man, but for reasons including preference. Magdalene could have been the same Mary that annointed his feet with oil, because of a turn of phrase at his death, where it is mentioned the names of the women with whom he always traveled. Annointing with oil was The way a queen bestowed her favor on a chosen male to become her consort (not king). So Jesus is a consort, but doesn't have true power--until John dies. It is supposed that the evening spent with the young man might have been for bisexual interest, but...

I'll throw my own wrench into it. What if it was to complete the cycle followed by pagans? The dying youth/maiden/mother/crone idea, and what if the youth was actually his son by Magdalene, for the sake of the Christian concepts?

Now, this all assumes he was an actual person to begin with, but there are only two historical references to him that were anywhere close to his point of life/death. One is from a man that liked to make up things to sound important, so...(I don't give Josephus much credit). Funny that Pilot supposedly determined if Jesus should die on the cross, after asking the Jews, when so many other women were claiming to be Kings of the Jews at the time, it wouldn't have made sense with the way the Roman judicial system worked at the time, and the meticulous records of the Romans never mention anything about Jesus living or dying.



enrico_dandolo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 866

19 Sep 2012, 3:45 pm

rosemund wrote:
I can't believe I didn't find this thread before. This is one of my special interests, so...

Actually, that is because it is a thread from 2010, resurrected yesterday by ArrantPariah.



rosemund
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 125
Location: South East Texas

19 Sep 2012, 3:52 pm

enrico_dandolo wrote:
rosemund wrote:
I can't believe I didn't find this thread before. This is one of my special interests, so...

Actually, that is because it is a thread from 2010, resurrected yesterday by ArrantPariah.


So it was. I hadn't looked at the original date of the thread. Is it good or bad that it was resurrected? *also wonders if the pun was intentional or not*



enrico_dandolo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 866

19 Sep 2012, 3:59 pm

Normally, it is rather bad form to bring threads back from the dead. Better to start a new one. This way, one does not need to read 7 pages from the start, whereas one can join a new thread as it begins.

(Yes, the pun was intended -- or rather, noticed, since I always use this expression.)