Bible promotes outdated kingships, kingdoms vs democracy?
Is the Bible today - year 2011 - politically subversive to modern society since it actively promotes the outdated idea of queens, kings, kingships, kingdoms, monarchies vs modern democracy?
The Bible also promotes slavery as in Christians like Saul/Paul being a slave to Jesus Christ.
Is that a violation of civil rights in the USA?
- Politics, Philosophies, Religions, Democracies vs Matriarchies/Monarchies
Kingdoms are outdated, but the epistles order Christians to obey all authority.
http://www.bricktestament.com/epistles/ ... 13_01.html
http://www.bricktestament.com/epistles/ ... 12_14.html
http://www.bricktestament.com/epistles/ ... 13_05.html
http://www.bricktestament.com/epistles/ ... 3_02a.html
http://www.bricktestament.com/epistles/ ... 3_02b.html
_________________
.
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
I doubt Samuel would have agreed, given what is written in 1 Samuel 8:4-20
One of my favorite passages. Israel's greatest sin was asking for a human king. The Israelites wanted to be like every other nation. Bad career move.
ruveyn
One of my favorite passages. Israel's greatest sin was asking for a human king. The Israelites wanted to be like every other nation. Bad career move.
ruveyn
Hey, me too I see a parallel to when Israel became a nation.
I think we traded a bit of our specialness and objective outsider viewpoint
and became a nation like any other.
-Jake
Hey, me too I see a parallel to when Israel became a nation.
I think we traded a bit of our specialness and objective outsider viewpoint
and became a nation like any other.
-Jake
Amen. One cannot be "chosen" or "special" and also be like everyone else. It is either - or and not both.
ruveyn
Given the context of the epistles, Paul certainly wasn't saying to yield to governments mindlessly. After all, he was arrested several times and commited treason by spreading the word. I believe it was more a call to not be like the zealots, who tried to destroy the roman empire. And failed. Badly.
I think the hebrew bible can be read as being opposed to kings.
in addition to samuel.
1) the first three kings
Saul -the righteous man (was not Saul among the prophets)
Transgresses at the sacrifice and tries to kill david.
David -the brave man
kills for gain
Solomon -the wisest man
Brings Idolatry into Israel
I think they are posited as arguments that no king can be good
no matter what the character of the man who becames king he ends a villian.
-Jake
"King of Kings, Lord of Lords" comes word for word from the titles of the rulers of ancient Persia.
When the Bible was written, monarchy was the way things were done. People express their mythology in terms of the language and culture of their time and place. The Bible was written by and for people of a different culture and, in my opinion, does not really apply to modern day peoples if one insists on taking it literally. If one can grasp the meaning of the teachings without getting hung up on the details of the stories used to communicate those teachings, that is fine. Unfortunately that is difficult for many people.
The 20th century philosopher Alan Watts commented more than once how ironic it is that there are many people who claim to love democracy but who cling to a monarchical model of the universe.
_________________
"When you ride over sharps, you get flats!"--The Bicycling Guitarist, May 13, 2008
...Song of Songs, vanity of vanities...'twas the Semitic way of forming the superlative. The most kingly among kings; the lordliest of lords; the song to end all songs.
_________________
For men are homesick in their homes,
And strangers under the sun,
And they lay their heads in a foreign land
Whenever the day is done."