Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Does Pope Francis kick ass?

Page 5 of 7 [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

03 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm

MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

03 Dec 2013, 5:50 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR0OuwNnm8E[/youtube]



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

03 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm

What is the rate of Episcopalian priests molesting compared to Catholic?
Just curious.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

03 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.


Exactly!

Do you agree that it's potentially dangerous thinking for the Pope to blame the existence of corruption in the world and "lack of ethics" on lack of faith and secularization?

It doesn't look like there'll be much agreement on important standards between Catholics and seculars ny time soon.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

03 Dec 2013, 6:38 pm

MCalavera wrote:
sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.


Exactly!

Do you agree that it's potentially dangerous thinking for the Pope to blame the existence of corruption in the world and "lack of ethics" on lack of faith and secularization?

It doesn't look like there'll be much agreement on important standards between Catholics and seculars ny time soon.


I look at it as a vast improvement. Keep in mind that a little something is a vast improvement over nothing. Any pope who does not make contraception and homosexuality his #1 priority shows at least some progress in an institution that has refused to move forward for so very long. John Paul II was a vast improvement over the one he replaced (even though he still wasn't all that great). This guy is a vast improvement over JPII. I just ignore that Hitler Youth turd who resigned. I see it as at least baby steps toward dogmatic reform. It gives me hope for an institution that I had all but written off in its entirety.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

03 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.


Exactly!

Do you agree that it's potentially dangerous thinking for the Pope to blame the existence of corruption in the world and "lack of ethics" on lack of faith and secularization?

It doesn't look like there'll be much agreement on important standards between Catholics and seculars ny time soon.


I look at it as a vast improvement. Keep in mind that a little something is a vast improvement over nothing. Any pope who does not make contraception and homosexuality his #1 priority shows at least some progress in an institution that has refused to move forward for so very long. John Paul II was a vast improvement over the one he replaced (even though he still wasn't all that great). This guy is a vast improvement over JPII. I just ignore that Hitler Youth turd who resigned. I see it as at least baby steps toward dogmatic reform. It gives me hope for an institution that I had all but written off in its entirety.


It's a vast improvement if the Pope makes a big deal out of issues related to contraception and homosexuality. And in a positive way.

You keep saying he's better than John Paul II, but that's probably you just idealizing him without sufficient evidence.

Again, the contrast principle must be mentioned. Feel free to look it up on Google if you don't know what it's about and are interested.



AspE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,114

03 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.

Unlike other demographics, they hide their child rapists from the law.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

03 Dec 2013, 6:58 pm

MCalavera wrote:
sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
sonofghandi wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
Yeah, that's why your saintly Catholic priests are corrupted enough to molest children.


The rates of child molestation among priests is almost the same as for any other demographic. All it really does is show that clergy come from the ranks of humanity.


Exactly!

Do you agree that it's potentially dangerous thinking for the Pope to blame the existence of corruption in the world and "lack of ethics" on lack of faith and secularization?

It doesn't look like there'll be much agreement on important standards between Catholics and seculars ny time soon.


I look at it as a vast improvement. Keep in mind that a little something is a vast improvement over nothing. Any pope who does not make contraception and homosexuality his #1 priority shows at least some progress in an institution that has refused to move forward for so very long. John Paul II was a vast improvement over the one he replaced (even though he still wasn't all that great). This guy is a vast improvement over JPII. I just ignore that Hitler Youth turd who resigned. I see it as at least baby steps toward dogmatic reform. It gives me hope for an institution that I had all but written off in its entirety.


It's a vast improvement if the Pope makes a big deal out of issues related to contraception and homosexuality. And in a positive way.

You keep saying he's better than John Paul II, but that's probably you just idealizing him without sufficient evidence.

Again, the contrast principle must be mentioned. Feel free to look it up on Google if you don't know what it's about and are interested.


He has a good track record for helping those less fortunate at home for quite some time before being promoted. That and his focus on the poor while refraining from a call to arms against "enemies of the church" are what make me say he is better. I will concede that he may not be any better, but the current information suggests otherwise.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

04 Dec 2013, 4:23 am

Would you rather he declare homosexuality and contraception to be acceptable, and get bogged down in that fight, rather than focusing on all the other issues which plague the church?

Talk about moral absolutes...



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

04 Dec 2013, 4:31 am

The other issues won't bog him down in a fight? Yeah, right.

Also, having a strong sense of morality does not equate to believing in moral absolutes or possessing them.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

10 Dec 2013, 3:01 pm

Fox News hates him

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCWplOnQU9U[/youtube]


An excellent reason to love him.



sonofghandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)

10 Dec 2013, 3:07 pm

The reason that I like him is his #1 priority: the suffering and hopelessness of the have-nots. I don't agree with a large majority of his moral or religious beliefs, but I do agree with his primary focus.

Focus on the issues negatively affecting the largest number of people first.


_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche


MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

11 Dec 2013, 1:06 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
Fox News hates him

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCWplOnQU9U[/youtube]


An excellent reason to love him.


That's just "loving" him for the wrong reasons.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

11 Dec 2013, 10:30 am

MCalavera wrote:
That's just "loving" him for the wrong reasons.


The enemy of my enemy....



GoonSquad
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 May 2007
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,748
Location: International House of Paincakes...

11 Dec 2013, 5:24 pm

sonofghandi wrote:
The reason that I like him is his #1 priority: the suffering and hopelessness of the have-nots. I don't agree with a large majority of his moral or religious beliefs, but I do agree with his primary focus.

Focus on the issues negatively affecting the largest number of people first.


Exactly. People of goodwill need to come together to achieve common goals whenever they can.

If you're only willing you collaborate with those who are ideologically pure, you'll never get anything done.


_________________
No man is free who is not master of himself.~Epictetus


MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

11 Dec 2013, 10:31 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
MCalavera wrote:
That's just "loving" him for the wrong reasons.


The enemy of my enemy....


If Fox News hated Hitler, would you love him then?