Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Our New President - President Donald Trump

Page 6 of 214 [ 3415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 214  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

Datalis
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 16 Jan 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 133

23 Jan 2017, 9:58 am

feral botanist wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Every government uses propoganda. In the US, we call it TV and movies.

The military cooperates with directors on movies that show the military in a good light and they do not cooperate with directors of movies that do not.

This was more obvious before CGI. In the 1980-1990s, look at which moviess use Blackhawk helicopters vs which ones use Hueys.

That actually further proves my point. The media has pushed for a narrative that's negative towards men and towards masculinity.



Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

23 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm

Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Uh... how do you figure that about women's rights?

What part of advocating internet censorship, advocating alimony, advocating killing male babies; what part of that is a about women's rights? The new wave of feminism isn't about womens rights. It's turned into a fest of fat, miserable, men hating, freedom hating fools.


Huh? If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that, as they are no better than white nationalists in their bigotry.
And what's wrong with alimony? Sometimes the woman, if she's much wealthier than the man, pays the alimony.
And killing male babies? Who the hell seriously advocates that?

To concept of alimony in and of itself is stupid. A lot of so-called feminists advocate that. I don't feel like posting links, but they are all over youtube. "If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that". Why would I expect anything less? I haven't been on those sites, but that statement tells me you either willfully ignorant that men go through a lot of hardships, or you don't care.[/quote

Look the idea of killing babies of any sort is almost universally regarded as horrible just talk to anyone about its weird to just assume that feminists have thosw beliefs since next to no one does. I advise you also to look at feminist third wave philosophy on wikipedia you will find nothing of that sort. None of the many feminists I have also met advocate for this type of killing it is seen as terrible and outlandish.



Meistersinger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,700
Location: Beautiful(?) West Manchester Township PA

23 Jan 2017, 3:06 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
But what if that man can't fish, or is physically or mentally incapable of making a living, is he just supposed be left to die? The government has a responsibility to care for those in need if we are actually a country of faith..


Bill, unfortunately, in this environment, it's every man for himself. There is no such thing as charity anymore. Civility is now passé. It is now better to die that put up with the jack-booted thugs that support our 'Beloved Leader."



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,817
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jan 2017, 4:00 pm

Meistersinger wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
But what if that man can't fish, or is physically or mentally incapable of making a living, is he just supposed be left to die? The government has a responsibility to care for those in need if we are actually a country of faith..


Bill, unfortunately, in this environment, it's every man for himself. There is no such thing as charity anymore. Civility is now passé. It is now better to die that put up with the jack-booted thugs that support our 'Beloved Leader."


I dunno; I still hope resistance is possible.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

23 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm

I need to hear more, but it sounds like President Trump is giving more control to the States! Just what I wanted! This may mean that he will also give abortion rights to the States, as well. So far, health care plans will be in more control of the states. My Ma just said also, that she heard people will not be forced to pay for healthcare.

My thought about all of the healthcare is that Obama set us up to fail with ObamaCare. It ended up not working, because there is no easy way to provide healthcare for everyone. Even the plan of forcing people to purchase healthcare wasn't working because it wasn't being enforced. The people who don't pay for healthcare are going to end up going to the ER as usual - they are doing that now. I need to hear more.


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,817
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm

Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Uh... how do you figure that about women's rights?

What part of advocating internet censorship, advocating alimony, advocating killing male babies; what part of that is a about women's rights? The new wave of feminism isn't about womens rights. It's turned into a fest of fat, miserable, men hating, freedom hating fools.


Huh? If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that, as they are no better than white nationalists in their bigotry.
And what's wrong with alimony? Sometimes the woman, if she's much wealthier than the man, pays the alimony.
And killing male babies? Who the hell seriously advocates that?

To concept of alimony in and of itself is stupid. A lot of so-called feminists advocate that. I don't feel like posting links, but they are all over youtube. "If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that". Why would I expect anything less? I haven't been on those sites, but that statement tells me you either willfully ignorant that men go through a lot of hardships, or you don't care.


If I didn't know any better, I'd say you just showed your hand for being a men's rightser.
Sure, men suffer. So do women. Correcting past wrongs committed against a group of citizens left outside isn't about taking rights away from the ingroup, but about bringing those on the outside in.
And for the record, before I was married, I had been terribly taken advantage of by a woman with Borderline Personality Disorder, and trust me, I suffered reams. But I didn't walk away a misogynist.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

23 Jan 2017, 4:11 pm

Meistersinger wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
But what if that man can't fish, or is physically or mentally incapable of making a living, is he just supposed be left to die? The government has a responsibility to care for those in need if we are actually a country of faith..


Bill, unfortunately, in this environment, it's every man for himself. There is no such thing as charity anymore. Civility is now passé. It is now better to die that put up with the jack-booted thugs that support our 'Beloved Leader."


Another fine day at WP - letting you call people names again. I'm going take Mr. R.'s advice. I JUST LOVE TRUMP - our new PRESIDENT AND BELOVED LEADER!

Sincerely,

One Jack-Booted Thug (otherwise known as Angie - your favorite NT! That's me! :mrgreen: )


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


redrobin62
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,009
Location: Seattle, WA

23 Jan 2017, 4:23 pm

Sigh. I was recently warned about my anti-NT and anti-GOP rhetoric and that it will not be tolerated. So, all you alt-right people, you win. I admit defeat even here at a site created by, and sworn to, protecting those of us with Asperger's Syndrome.


_________________
One Day At A Time.
His first book: http://www.amazon.com/Wetland-Other-Sto ... B00E0NVTL2
His second book: https://www.amazon.com/COMMONER-VAGABON ... oks&sr=1-2
His blog: http://seattlewordsmith.wordpress.com/


Meistersinger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,700
Location: Beautiful(?) West Manchester Township PA

23 Jan 2017, 4:39 pm

redrobin62 wrote:
Sigh. I was recently warned about my anti-NT and anti-GOP rhetoric and that it will not be tolerated. So, all you alt-right people, you win. I admit defeat even here at a site created by, and sworn to, protecting those of us with Asperger's Syndrome.


Welcome to George Orwell's 1984. We'd better learn NewSpeak and quick, as well as unconditionally submit to our superiors like a lapdog, if we're to survive.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,817
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jan 2017, 4:48 pm

redrobin62 wrote:
Sigh. I was recently warned about my anti-NT and anti-GOP rhetoric and that it will not be tolerated. So, all you alt-right people, you win. I admit defeat even here at a site created by, and sworn to, protecting those of us with Asperger's Syndrome.


There was another longtime WP member who has been banned for life, just recently. You very well may know who I'm talking about. That said, while I admit everyone here should practice more civility - including myself - I refuse to live in fear that I'll be banned for just defending what I know is right.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Datalis
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 16 Jan 2017
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 133

23 Jan 2017, 4:53 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Uh... how do you figure that about women's rights?

What part of advocating internet censorship, advocating alimony, advocating killing male babies; what part of that is a about women's rights? The new wave of feminism isn't about womens rights. It's turned into a fest of fat, miserable, men hating, freedom hating fools.


Huh? If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that, as they are no better than white nationalists in their bigotry.
And what's wrong with alimony? Sometimes the woman, if she's much wealthier than the man, pays the alimony.
And killing male babies? Who the hell seriously advocates that?

To concept of alimony in and of itself is stupid. A lot of so-called feminists advocate that. I don't feel like posting links, but they are all over youtube. "If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that". Why would I expect anything less? I haven't been on those sites, but that statement tells me you either willfully ignorant that men go through a lot of hardships, or you don't care.


If I didn't know any better, I'd say you just showed your hand for being a men's rightser.
Sure, men suffer. So do women. Correcting past wrongs committed against a group of citizens left outside isn't about taking rights away from the ingroup, but about bringing those on the outside in.
And for the record, before I was married, I had been terribly taken advantage of by a woman with Borderline Personality Disorder, and trust me, I suffered reams. But I didn't walk away a misogynist.

And I went to public school for 12 years and didn't become a Marxist. Again, you obviously don't know the hardships or you're in denial. Either way, it isn't my problem and you're not going to ruin my day by calling me names.



redrobin62
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,009
Location: Seattle, WA

23 Jan 2017, 5:43 pm

I do apologize for my extreme language. I just want to emphasize that we've arrived at an extreme point in American, and world, history. The presidency of Brother Trump is NOT to be taken lightly. Left unchecked, his administration will have a profound effect on us all as well as cast a huge pall across the globe. How do I know that? If any of the protests in cities around the planet aren't an indication, then nothing is.

Trump, Marine LePen, and all the pro Anglo-Saxon politicians around the world are attempting to serve no one but themselves and their own interests. The Pope is right - these people are a breeding ground for a resurrected Nazi administration.

Ben Carson is an aberration. How he can look at himself in the mirror every day is a mystery to me. Head of Housing & Urban Development? What will be his stance when same-sex couples, whom he despises, seeks refuge in public housing which he oversees? This motherf*cker is such a sellout he'd probably vote for racial profiling and any other policies that specifically target his own kind, black people. In Africa, such turncoats are usually rounded up, tied to rubber tires, and set on fire.


_________________
One Day At A Time.
His first book: http://www.amazon.com/Wetland-Other-Sto ... B00E0NVTL2
His second book: https://www.amazon.com/COMMONER-VAGABON ... oks&sr=1-2
His blog: http://seattlewordsmith.wordpress.com/


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

23 Jan 2017, 5:55 pm

Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Uh... how do you figure that about women's rights?

What part of advocating internet censorship, advocating alimony, advocating killing male babies; what part of that is a about women's rights? The new wave of feminism isn't about womens rights. It's turned into a fest of fat, miserable, men hating, freedom hating fools.

Fat shaming eh?You know there are chubby men also.Who is advocating killing male babies?Alimony goes both ways,I know a man that was getting fat stacks from his ex wife.I don't hate men,I have a son that I love dearly and had a Dad I adored.Freedom hating? Where do you get that?Miserable,no I feel pretty damm good.Internet censorship,nope I sign petitions against that.Seems more like you are the miserable hateful one.You sure come across that way.Who s**t in your hat??


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,817
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

23 Jan 2017, 6:08 pm

Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Datalis wrote:
Regarding the women's march. A certain quote comes to mind.
"He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
- George Orwell's 1984


So... you're saying you hate all women, too?

Certainly not, just pointing how they are manipulated with modern day "Feminism". The only part that isn't really accurate though, it's usually the unattractive women.


1984 was written before the rise of modern feminism.
And attractive or unattractive are in the eye of the beholden.

Government propaganda was still around, specifically Communism and Socialism. Both are forms of Marxism and modern day feminism embraces Marxism.


Uh... how do you figure that about women's rights?

What part of advocating internet censorship, advocating alimony, advocating killing male babies; what part of that is a about women's rights? The new wave of feminism isn't about womens rights. It's turned into a fest of fat, miserable, men hating, freedom hating fools.


Huh? If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that, as they are no better than white nationalists in their bigotry.
And what's wrong with alimony? Sometimes the woman, if she's much wealthier than the man, pays the alimony.
And killing male babies? Who the hell seriously advocates that?

To concept of alimony in and of itself is stupid. A lot of so-called feminists advocate that. I don't feel like posting links, but they are all over youtube. "If your talking about criticising so called men's rights sites, then I'm all for that". Why would I expect anything less? I haven't been on those sites, but that statement tells me you either willfully ignorant that men go through a lot of hardships, or you don't care.


If I didn't know any better, I'd say you just showed your hand for being a men's rightser.
Sure, men suffer. So do women. Correcting past wrongs committed against a group of citizens left outside isn't about taking rights away from the ingroup, but about bringing those on the outside in.
And for the record, before I was married, I had been terribly taken advantage of by a woman with Borderline Personality Disorder, and trust me, I suffered reams. But I didn't walk away a misogynist.

And I went to public school for 12 years and didn't become a Marxist. Again, you obviously don't know the hardships or you're in denial. Either way, it isn't my problem and you're not going to ruin my day by calling me names.


I seriously doubt anyone gets turned into a Marxist in public schools.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,471
Location: Aux Arcs

23 Jan 2017, 6:17 pm

About the litter after the march,showing pics of litter next to a FULL trash can is ridiculous.If the can was overflowing that's where most people would place it.Read the last paragraph in the link,The NPS said the trash was where it should be.
http://www.wusa9.com/news/politics/nati ... /390163891


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

23 Jan 2017, 6:27 pm

Kraichgauer wrote:
If I didn't know any better, I'd say you just showed your hand for being a men's rightser.
Sure, men suffer. So do women. Correcting past wrongs committed against a group of citizens left outside isn't about taking rights away from the ingroup, but about bringing those on the outside in.
And for the record, before I was married, I had been terribly taken advantage of by a woman with Borderline Personality Disorder, and trust me, I suffered reams. But I didn't walk away a misogynist.


If I'm reading you correctly - I may not be, it's quite a muddled post - you're equating support of men's rights with misogyny, yes?