zendell wrote:
I don't support the death penalty for murderers because I want to kill them. I support it because I want to protect and save the lives of their next victims.
Death penalties have yielded highly mixed returns in the suppression of violent crime. Whether or not you believe this, you have just made yourself obligated to oppose death penalties in light of evidence that they tend to result in higher rates of violent crime. I will not argue with you about the statistics. I have researched the issue myself and formed my own conclusions. However, I cannot think that you are being straightforward with us if you are not actively researching the issue yourself, and I can hardly consider you an ethical person if you have no concern for how effective or uneffective it is in practice.
Conservatives tend to forget one of the most important lessons that behaviorism taught us: learned helplessness.
Quote:
If you think life in prison would work, check out how many kill other inmates and even the prison guards.
One of my best friends straightened out his life based upon his experiences with inmates who were serving life sentences. As he explained to me, these men have nothing to lose. After serving a sentence at one of the toughest joints in New York, in which there was no such thing as a death penalty at the time, he reformed his entire outlook on life based partially upon a deep terror that his next mistake could return him to that horrible place or worse.
Quote:
Therefore, I think supporting the death penalty is part of being pro-life.
Handy rationalization. Many who have commited acts of premeditated murder also formed rationalizations for their immoral actions.