White House: "Now Isn't The Time To Talk About Gun Control"

Page 3 of 6 [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Oct 2017, 10:52 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
LOL...actually, we do talk about the control of food intake when it comes to obesity. Which is peripherally related to "knives, forks, and spoon" control.


Intake is the act.
I've seen no legislation suggested to control or ban eating utensils.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

04 Oct 2017, 12:26 pm

I said "peripherally related."

But I get what you mean.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

04 Oct 2017, 2:13 pm

Chichikov wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/article/no-way-prevent-says-only-nation-where-regularly-ha-57086

Quote:
LAS VEGAS—In the hours following a violent rampage in Las Vegas in which a lone attacker killed more than 50 individuals and seriously injured 400 others, citizens living in the only country where this kind of mass killing routinely occurs reportedly concluded Monday that there was no way to prevent the massacre from taking place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Onion


Quote:
At press time, residents of the only economically advanced nation in the world where roughly two mass shootings have occurred every month for the past five years were referring to themselves and their situation as “helpless.”


I'll put it in simple terms you can understand. There's a problem when only the satirists point out the obvious.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Chichikov
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,151
Location: UK

04 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm

There's an even bigger problem when people pass stories on not realising they are satire. I think Trump has a phrase for it.....



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Oct 2017, 4:43 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I said "peripherally related."

But I get what you mean.


And both eating utensils and guns are peripheral to the acts, meaning they themselves are not a cause.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

04 Oct 2017, 11:37 pm

Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates. School cafeterias who have eliminated trays have seen reduced obesity among their students.

So, a homicidal maniac will kill a few people with a less powerful gun, but if you give them a bigger gun they will pile on the kills.

Plate control would also save lives.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Nekomonster
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2016
Age: 22
Gender: Male
Posts: 272

05 Oct 2017, 8:57 am

The difference between gun control and plate/utensil control is that the size of your plate cannot necessarily stop you from eating too much...there's also the fact that the only person who's really getting harmed in the end is yourself.

If a person cannot get their hands on a weapon designed to kill mass amounts of people as fast as possible (harming others besides themselves), it won't happen.


_________________
god...it's brutal out here


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Oct 2017, 12:15 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates. School cafeterias who have eliminated trays have seen reduced obesity among their students.

Sounds like BS since most students only eat one meal in the school cafeteria and there's nothing to stop them from eating junk food in school out of their backpacks or eating whatever at home.

Quote:
So, a homicidal maniac will kill a few people with a less powerful gun, but if you give them a bigger gun they will pile on the kills.

Maybe you should first learn a little bit about the guns you want to ban. This illusion of "assault rifles" being bigger and more powerful than anything else is laughable. Oh wait, we don't want to confuse you with facts...


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

05 Oct 2017, 12:49 pm

Raptor wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates. School cafeterias who have eliminated trays have seen reduced obesity among their students.

Sounds like BS since most students only eat one meal in the school cafeteria and there's nothing to stop them from eating junk food in school out of their backpacks or eating whatever at home.

Quote:
So, a homicidal maniac will kill a few people with a less powerful gun, but if you give them a bigger gun they will pile on the kills.

Maybe you should first learn a little bit about the guns you want to ban. This illusion of "assault rifles" being bigger and more powerful than anything else is laughable. Oh wait, we don't want to confuse you with facts...


Stuff your smug strutting. Guns better suited to killing lots of people, if you prefer. Let's ban those.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Oct 2017, 12:55 pm

Nekomonster wrote:
If a person cannot get their hands on a weapon designed to kill mass amounts of people as fast as possible (harming others besides themselves), it won't happen.

Too late; due to concern over potential bans during the last administration the AR-15 variants, semi-auto versions of the AK-47 and AK-74, and others became extremely popular and unprecedented amounts of them were sold. The AR-15 is now the most popular rifle in America. Even serious talk in DC of another ban right now would only trigger another sales surge. I'm sure the manufacturers and retailers would love it just as much as they have so far.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


SH90
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jul 2016
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,558
Location: Florida

05 Oct 2017, 1:02 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Stuff your smug strutting. Guns better suited to killing lots of people, if you prefer. Let's ban those.


I hope you realize that there is a valid sporting purpose for these "evil" rifles... Anything can be used to kill lots of people. Should we ban fertilizer, airplanes, or even trucks?



Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates. School cafeterias who have eliminated trays have seen reduced obesity among their students.

Sounds like BS since most students only eat one meal in the school cafeteria and there's nothing to stop them from eating junk food in school out of their backpacks or eating whatever at home.

Quote:
So, a homicidal maniac will kill a few people with a less powerful gun, but if you give them a bigger gun they will pile on the kills.

Maybe you should first learn a little bit about the guns you want to ban. This illusion of "assault rifles" being bigger and more powerful than anything else is laughable. Oh wait, we don't want to confuse you with facts...


Stuff your smug strutting.

Oh, you mean bringing facts into this? Sorry, but I don't plan on stopping.

Quote:
Guns better suited to killing lots of people, if you prefer. Let's ban those.

Read my reply to Nekomonster. I've stated the same before in several WP gunsz-r-bad threads over the years and in that time those scary guns have only increased in numbers. Good luck with your ban.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

05 Oct 2017, 1:08 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates...

That might not be effective with everyone since food can still be piled high on a small plate, but I do think there is some reasonable logic there...and I agree here:

Quote:
"Now...is a time to reflect on what has happened and how we can work constructively on what can be done to curb the impact of these evil, deranged attackers."

"The ATF must re-evaluate these devices, and it is my hope that they conclude these mechanisms violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the law..."

House GOP members write ATF asking for review of bump stocks

Please note: The above is about "what can be done to curb the impact" of this type of criminal usage of guns and not how to keep guns out of people's hands.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

05 Oct 2017, 1:12 pm

SH90 wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Guns better suited to killing lots of people, if you prefer. Let's ban those.


I hope you realize that there is a valid sporting purpose for these "evil" rifles... Anything can be used to kill lots of people. Should we ban fertilizer, airplanes, or even trucks?


Don't you start. Fertilizer now contains coded microparticles which allow us to trace each batch. Trucks took people by surprise, but we've gotten a lot better at defending against them using other trucks and concrete blocks.

We've had guns capable of killing any animal for quite some time. People collect guns which primarily kill people. The second should stop. Fetishize fake infantry weapons. You can take them home and do whatever you want with them.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

05 Oct 2017, 1:18 pm

leejosepho wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates...

That might not be effective with everyone since food can still be piled high on a small plate, but I do think there is some reasonable logic there...and I agree here:

Quote:
"Now...is a time to reflect on what has happened and how we can work constructively on what can be done to curb the impact of these evil, deranged attackers."

"The ATF must re-evaluate these devices, and it is my hope that they conclude these mechanisms violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the law..."

House GOP members write ATF asking for review of bump stocks


leejosepho wrote:
Please note: The above is about "what can be done to curb the impact" of this type of criminal usage of guns and not how to keep guns out of people's hands.


Someone who shows no signs of having a problem, then, can get any kind of gun they want?


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Oct 2017, 1:32 pm

leejosepho wrote:
jrjones9933 wrote:
Plates provide a useful analogy, perhaps. People will take more food, if they have bigger plates...

That might not be effective with everyone since food can still be piled high on a small plate, but I do think there is some reasonable logic there...and I agree here:

Quote:
"Now...is a time to reflect on what has happened and how we can work constructively on what can be done to curb the impact of these evil, deranged attackers."

"The ATF must re-evaluate these devices, and it is my hope that they conclude these mechanisms violate the spirit, if not the letter, of the law..."

House GOP members write ATF asking for review of bump stocks

Please note: The above is about "what can be done to curb the impact" of this type of criminal usage of guns and not how to keep guns out of people's hands.


They are attempting to offer up a sacrificial lamb when they probably don't even need to. I think bump stocks are idiotic but I don't support banning them.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson