Tears Of Defeat In Not Enough .. A Compensation For Iraqis

Post Reply New Topic

Tears Of Defeat In Not Enough .. A Compensation For Iraqis Is Required
By: Dr. Adnan Bumutee on: 15.09.2007

Friday, 14 September 2007


The tears of British occupation while withdrawaling from Basrah unhappily is not enough, rather it is not enough for the British politicians to say “Sorry” or we were deceived on the war of Iraq, Iraq was savagely robbed along the years of boycott sanction and occupation, you were behind the American crimes in all its aspects and along all its tragic steps.


Since beginning of the nineties and the British support to destroy Iraq has not been stopped. In spite of the political ideology variation of all British Administrations as conservatives and labours, the genocide against the Iraqis was continued and from due time the respect of British crown is collapsing while participation in the biggest massacre recorded in the contemporary history is carried on. Here is Basrah, shows the courageous rejection to the occupation and repeats the same lesson to the British occupation forces and keeps them under shame in front of the world. So the result is same without any changes, withdrawal, defeatness and shame are the fate of the invaders.


In twenties the when British invaders walked to Iraq and Basrah in order to occupy Baghdad they has disseminated the news of liberation of Iraq from the Ottoman Turks, they started to rob Iraq’s petroleum after they divided the country according to Sykes-Picot agreement, as if the same story in details is repeated today, therefore occupying a country and participating into destruction and killing million of its inhabits and scatter five millions is it to liberate Iraq from Saddam’s injustice and oppression, however, the reason for all these and the international war to Iraq is to rob its petroleum, to control its strategic wealth and to protect existence of the Zionist Israel.


The blood of innocent Iraqis will remain on the face of every British as shaming stain, blood of children and women will keep chasing the war criminal Tony Blair, who returned to the region to activate the peace operation, it’s a repugnance joke to for such man undertake this role and his hands are sticky with Iraqis blood.

I, personally, had joined the demonstration of one and a half million honorable British walked against the war on Iraq, those were demonstrated perior to the war, it is similar as confirming the illegality of the war, Tony Blair did not hear them he carried on his way as a blind until the dark fate, he should be trialed for justice before the courts in his country for causing this national disaster.


It is required from the British nation and all active powers to apologize for what their government caused to the Iraqi people, it is not enough to feel pity for death of a hundred British soldier as the public surveys emphasized forgetting the biggest destruction of Iraq publicly and historically and the loses suffered by Iraqis. The tears are not enough to return a country that has been divided and pushed to an internal war and destroying the social tissue of it and encouraging the sectarian and ethnical conflict.


It is require from all honorable British to announce in every occasion and campaign for the stability of Iraq and a complete withdrawal from the territory, this will strengthen the reconstruction of all national political, economical, security and military establishments far away of the clown Al-Maliki government the double puppet of Americans and Iranians, it is required to start the mechanism of paying the financial compensation same as the compensation paid (still is continued to be paid) to the Zionist Israel for the claimed burners, therefore, by this performance the withdrawal from Basrah will mean the reality far away from the mischief-makers of the politicians and their lies.


* Professor of Political Information _ Bahrain University

This was written by someone who holds a doctorate? they must have some pretty loose educational standards in Bahrain...

Dr. Adnan Bumutee, I salute you!

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`•¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.•´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

OK manalitwist,

Let's say the yanks and limeys start leaving today. Say the last one's out of Iraq in, what, a month.

What do you figure happens over there then. I doubt if they'll all get along like a family on some fifties TV sitcom.

Don't get me wrong, I say get the hell out, since we're supposedly there for the Iraqi people and it's obvious they don't want us there, and I don't see a damn thing getting accomplished.

What are your thoughts on how to minimize the bloodshed after we leave?

Would it be better if we exhume the corpse of Saddam Hussein and return him to power? According to the editorialist, he seems downright preferable to the British, us Americans, The Iranians, and whatever other non- Arabs in Iraq. -- Besides, you cannot dispute his credentials as an Iraqi.

I'm more impressed by the wholesale copyright violation. This was previously published somewhere, right? No link to the original source, no "fair use" snippets rather than just copying the whole thing? You do understand how illegal that is, right?

Unfortunately, there is no good solution in Iraq. Pulling out will cause a bloodbath, staying is causing a bloodbath. The time to prevent this was in the planning stages of the invasion. To enter a country as messed up as Iraq, with the huge infant mortality rates, torture chambers, economic stagnation, and make it worse shows a degree of incompetence that almost defies belief. I wish there was a good answer, but there is not: what both the British and Americans are obliged to do, by international law, is restore order and rebuild the country. That would require probably an additional penny on income tax and the institution of the draft. It's not politically tenable. It's what's legally required, but it'll never happen.

Lets get something clear. The blood of Iraq is NOT on the hands of every British citizen in ANY WAY.

That war went ahead DESPITE massive lack of public support. The people didnt want it, the poor bloody soldiers didnt want it either. If anyone is guilty, it is a selection of upper government ministers and unelected civil servants. Any payment of compensation to Iraq would not come from them, but from the general public, who are not guilty of a damn thing.

I also suggest that the term "Genocide" is being a little loosely applied. The British military isnt generally given to bouts of genocide.

"In a democracy, some may be guilty, but all are responsible."
-Hillel

It doesn't matter. We're a democracy. Every citizen is responsible. Every citizen has blood on their hands, because their elected government, elected by the people, carried out this action.

And the previous election? What happened there? There was an opportunity, post invasion, to throw the government out, but did people take it? Nope.
It's possible for citizens to impose local referrenda, it's possible to recall parliamentarians, there are ways in the UK system. It is an obligation for soldiers to disobey illegal orders. Did any of this happen? No.

Western societies need to stop absolving themselves of responsibility of their crimes. "It wasn't me! It was that guy over there!" Please. You elected him. It's your fault. Take responsibility for your own screwups already.