Why Aspergers isn't even a disorder
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,477
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
And this is why I was skeptical of Callista's post, because it actually seems to be trying to undermine the key problem with this disability. None of the secondary problems really, in my opinion, seem like they'd constitute a true disability. So it really is a "social thing" in terms of being disabled (or rather, not being able to mesh well with the system that the "normies" abide by).
What would you say is your biggest gripe with this disability? (I guess you sort of answered this already).
EDIT: And that's also why I'm not sure of XFilesGeek's reply that if someone's only problems are social, they're probably not an Aspie, because, what other truly disabling traits are there? And I'm asking this in all seriousness, because if there is more to it than a "social thing," then what are some of these things?
I find the sensory issues to be pretty severe, and I get overwhelmed pretty easily...and seem to have some issues with processing input. Then of course there are the social issues, and some of those would likely exist even if we had a different society.
_________________
We won't go back.
But there must be something that binds them together, something that's common in all of them to meet that definition.
But if the impairments are caused by an inability to "read" other people, to naturally socialize they way they do, and to not comprehend their social "logic," or to reject aspects of it, isn't that what Asperger's is?
The personality disorders, while they could affect some aspies, also affect NTs. A schizoid could fully comprehend NT socializing, and be able to do it as naturally as the next NT, but he just wouldn't enjoy it. Asperger's, at least I thought, was the inability to naturally do these things the way NTs do.
Last edited by again_with_this on 19 Jun 2012, 7:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
I do think that social disabilities are the main issue and most problematic for people with autism in general, though, particularly if that also includes verbal communication.
Well the Asperger's diagnosis, if I'm not mistaken, excludes verbal communicative problems. So while verbal problems may be key issues for other autistics, it's apparently not a factor in Asperger's.
My speech problems are the reason why I'm not diagnosed with AS.
AS is far more than just social problems.
OK, give me a few examples of your sensory issues and what happens to you when you encounter them.
As for the input thing, isn't most of that social input anyway, tying back in with the whole social disconnect from the NTs?
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
But there must be something that binds them together, something that's common in all of them to meet that definition.
Must there be? I believe the binding element is how the brain processes input, output, and information/data storage. This isn't explained in any symptom lists because you cannot observe these processes reliably, at least not without an expensive brain scan.
But if the impairments are caused by an inability to "read" other people, to naturally socialize they way they do, and to not comprehend their social "logic," or to reject aspects of it, isn't that what Asperger's is?
No. That's part of what Asperger's Syndrome is, but not the whole picture. RRBs are also part of the diagnostic picture. And you don't actually need to have an impairment in reading people. There's four criteria and you only need to meet two of them. You might be impaired in expressing nonverbal communication, but be able to understand other people to some extent, technically, according to the criteria.
Schizoid personality disorder is described in terms of social deficits. If they didn't have those social deficits, they wouldn't qualify for a diagnosis of SPD. Some people with SPD might understand NT socializing, but I do not believe they all do.
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
OK, give me a few examples of your sensory issues and what happens to you when you encounter them.
As for the input thing, isn't most of that social input anyway, tying back in with the whole social disconnect from the NTs?
Here's an input problem I have at times. I notice it more when I'm playing video games (and far more likely to be overstimulated visually) but it happens elsewhere too. I was playing an online multiplayer game recently, and when I'd played too long I would stop processing visual input, at least partially. I knew I had to use the keys to move around, but I'd confuse enemies for architecture, or not recognize architecture at all and run into it uselessly because it would take me time to notice I wasn't actually moving. When that sort of thing becomes more severe, you get to something like "meaning blindness" or visual agnosia, where one simply ceases to process visual input. This often happens to me when I have to focus on listening carefully - although that often causes auditory processing problems and I may not understand what I hear as well. Not just social input, but any kind of sensory input.
But there must be something that binds them together, something that's common in all of them to meet that definition.
Must there be? I believe the binding element is how the brain processes input, output, and information/data storage. This isn't explained in any symptom lists because you cannot observe these processes reliably, at least not without an expensive brain scan.
This is interesting, I'm learning here. But wouldn't such differences in brain processing manifest with some commonality between those who share that difference from the NTs?
But if the impairments are caused by an inability to "read" other people, to naturally socialize they way they do, and to not comprehend their social "logic," or to reject aspects of it, isn't that what Asperger's is?
Then in theory, if a person is able to fully understand social cues with ease, but is prone to non-social difficulties like stimming and incessant preoccupation with one subject, he could have Asperger's? Whereas, someone who struggles with social cues but doesn't have any other symptoms might not have Asperger's?
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Likely, but how is it observed in terms of behavior, which is how the diagnosis is determined? I have a lot of things in common with some people who have more and more severe symptoms than I do, who are diagnosed with autism, and I have things in common with some people diagnosed with AS. I don't think all of these things would appear on a symptom list, simply because they won't be observed as what they are. Instead, they're likely to be classified as RRBs, depending on what one does with it. Similarly, you can have two autistic people who spend a lot of time just staring at walls, but they might not be doing it for the same reason.
Technically, yes. I suspect that doesn't happen very often, thoughthough (the reading with ease, I was trying to make a rhetorical point and I think I overreached). But yes.
Technically, yes. I suspect that doesn't happen very often, thoughthough (the reading with ease, I was trying to make a rhetorical point and I think I overreached). But yes.
But I think the point I was getting at is that not being able to read people with ease seems to be the one common variable among aspies, at least the ones on this site. While other issues may or may not be present, the "social thing" seems to be the defining trait of Asperger's. A lot of other nuances of the brain being different are probably present, but how they manifest and how debilitating they are would vary aspie to aspie, but that common trait seems to be universal.
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
Verdandi
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)
I also think you'll find that this trait doesn't exist to the same degree in everyone diagnosed with AS. Some people find it much more difficult than others. Joe90 says she can read people, but anxiety makes it hard for her to use the information. I don't really read people well at all. If the tests I took recently are accurate, I am actually fairly bad at it. Social imagination's another thing. Check out this thread here and look at the degrees of variation in answers among people who have AS:
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt161934.html
OK, cool. What are some of these things? I want to know.
- sensory difficulties
- special interests
- love of routines
Do you find your special interests, in and of themselves, to be disabilities?
Are your sensory difficulties ever so bad that you can't function at all?
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt161934.html
Where can I take some of these test regarding social ability?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Semantic pragmatic disorder |
15 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm |
Another Disorder invented to exonerate criminals |
31 Jan 2024, 12:21 am |
What I thought was Conduct Disorder Unspecified is Bipolar
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
09 Feb 2024, 11:39 am |
Borderline Personality Disorder Not Linked to Abnormal |
15 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm |