Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

1814
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 113

19 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm

Would a child of an Aspie and an NT non-carrier be NT then?



AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,663
Location: Houston, Texas

19 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm

Sure doesn't seem to be recessive.

My Grandmother, my mother, my sister and I are all Aspie (best that I can figure out).

Of course there are advantages to being on the Spectrum :D but there are some disadvantages, too.



Lucywlf
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 450

19 Aug 2012, 4:26 pm

Problem is, there's more than one gene involved in producing an Aspergers or Autistic person. It's how these genes are expressed that matters.

There's a free Autism course available on iTunes that talks about this.



again_with_this
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 780
Location: New Jersey, USA

19 Aug 2012, 7:44 pm

It may be biological, but not genetic. Something to do with how the brain forms in utero as opposed to the actual genes of the developing fetus.



InThisTogether
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2012
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,709
Location: USA

19 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm

again_with_this wrote:
It may be biological, but not genetic. Something to do with how the brain forms in utero as opposed to the actual genes of the developing fetus.


? Please share references? I had not heard this before. It would seem that those cases that tend to run in families there would have to be some kind of genetic variable, no?

But I don't think it follows the recessive/dominant patterns of inheritance such that one is a "carrier" of Autism, like Tay-Sachs or something of that nature. At least it doesn't seem like it when I think through my family and families I know well enough to consider.


_________________
Mom to 2 exceptional atypical kids
Long BAP lineage


SpectrumWarrior
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 87

19 Aug 2012, 8:36 pm

again_with_this wrote:
It may be biological, but not genetic. Something to do with how the brain forms in utero as opposed to the actual genes of the developing fetus.


Finding out I'm an aspie has to do with the fact I realized my son was one first.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 113,747
Location: the island of defective toy santas

19 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm

there were aspies on both sides of my family.



Einfari
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 555

19 Aug 2012, 11:04 pm

Autism isn't based on simple dominant/recessive genetics. It is caused by multiple genes, and most likely other environmental factors as well. I'm a starting genetics major, and I believe that Autism is inherited like skin color. Take this chart for example.
Image
Like Autism, skin color occurs as a spectrum. Skin color ranges from nearly white to dark brown, just as Autism ranges from mild to severe. If you compare Autism to the above chart, a NT would have all light alleles. An person with one or two dark alleles would have traits, but wouldn't be diagnosed with any form of Autism. A person with three or four dark alleles would be an Aspie. Someone with more than four dark alleles would have classic Autism. I don't think anyone knows what genes cause Autism, but I believe that they are inherited in the way I explained above.



riot_gun
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 74

20 Aug 2012, 12:04 am

A whole lot of genes have been linked to autism. No single one is the sole culprit and there's almost certainly some level of interaction between genes and environment that has to occur. It's definitely a whole lot messier than the standard dominant vs recessive inheritance that everybody learns in high school. Even in single gene traits there are other types of inheritance (incomplete dominance, co-dominance, and some other more obscure ones related to sex chromosomes and genes with more than two alleles and you probably get the picture) so something linked to a long list of genetic factors is obviously going to be hideously complicated.



DeaconBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Earth, mostly

20 Aug 2012, 11:30 am

Just to make things even more fun, current research is focusing on copy-number variations on genes. And while many seem inherited, some are de novo mutations, appearing in the genetic structure of neither parent. And in some patients, inherited and new mutations seem to be intermixed. Whee! :)


_________________
Sodium is a metal that reacts explosively when exposed to water. Chlorine is a gas that'll kill you dead in moments. Together they make my fries taste good.


Mummy_of_Peanut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,564
Location: Bonnie Scotland

20 Aug 2012, 11:48 am

If there was just one gene involved, the children would be NTs and would stand a 50% chance of being carriers.

However, it doesn't appear that a single gene is responsible.


_________________
"We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all we need to make us really happy is something to be enthusiatic about." Charles Kingsley


AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,663
Location: Houston, Texas

22 Aug 2012, 4:17 pm

Image

And most probably, since afterall different genes give different survival and reproduction advantages, some of these genes are more common and some are less common.



AardvarkGoodSwimmer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,663
Location: Houston, Texas

22 Aug 2012, 4:32 pm

And in the following post:

?Too many Clostridia bacteria as one cause of autism?
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt207147.html

I excerpt parts from an article in The Economist, I think, rather preliminary claims that some persons have their autism caused by too much Clostridia bacteria in the gut.
1) The body uses up sulphur stores since sulphate is a defense against these bacteria in turf wars.
2) Some autistic persons have impaired sulphur metabolism anyway, and
3) sulphur is (one of many) substances involved in brain development.

The article also claims:

Many persons on the Spectrum have intestinal issues. (This is certainly a generalization, now the question is, whether it's a good generalization.)

And the article made the intriguing point that picking up the same gut bacteria from your mother and other family members is another way diseases and conditions can run in a family, where you can have approximate, inexact inheritance (of the microbiome and not just the human genome).



Eloa
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,223

22 Aug 2012, 5:39 pm

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/05/health/research/scientists-link-rare-gene-mutations-to-heightened-risk-of-autism.html?pagewanted=all


_________________
English is not my native language, so I will very likely do mistakes in writing or understanding. My edits are due to corrections of mistakes, which I sometimes recognize just after submitting a text.