uncommondenominator wrote:
MaxE wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
Nope. I am immune to sealioning.
Accept or reject, there is no prove.
Although this thread sucked from its inception.
Without even worrying about proof, before we even get to accepting or rejecting, I would first like to be clear about what exactly you're saying or implying to begin with. Let's start with that, eh?
No need to blame the entire thread for the response to your own personal idea - whatever it may, or may not, be.
Now, if you're just gonna draw a line in the sand, and insist that people either "accept or reject, there is no prove"...
I'm not sure why people would accept what some person says without
any evidence or even
any arguments which clarify their views. It's very strange to me. Sometimes people think that their perspective, whatever it is, is THE American perspective, but the reality is that not all Americans think the same. For instance, some need evidence and/or logic to believe something or to think a certain way; others do not.
_________________
Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven. – Satan and TwilightPrincess