Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

nurseangela
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,017
Location: Kansas

24 Feb 2017, 2:53 am

http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrews ... 15565b5d81

From the article :

"Amazon argued that requests and responses to Alexa contained details that would reveal much about the user and their interests, and so deserved protection from government. Furthermore, as Alexa responses reflect in some way both the user's and Amazon's speech, she's also protected, the lawyers said."

I tell you, the woman is listening all the time and will even chime in when I'm not talking to her. I bet all my phone conversations are being recorded. Ma said when she comes over, she wants Alexa put away in her box. I just say that Alexa is part of the family now. :mrgreen:


_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.

Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

25 Feb 2017, 12:32 pm

I wonder if Alexa is pretty......

I do agree that she's covered under the First Amendment.



Lintar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,777
Location: Victoria, Australia

01 Mar 2017, 10:44 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I wonder if Alexa is pretty...


:roll:



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

02 Mar 2017, 12:36 am

That makes no sense.

You cannot be protected if you're dead.

The user in question was murdered, so is dead.

There is nothing the government can do to this dead person, so the person cannot be protected.