Campin_Cat wrote:
[
Quote:
quote="GnosticBishop"]
Campin_Cat wrote:
GnosticBishop wrote:
If there is only one begotten son, who are the sons of God spoken of in the O.T.?
Well, I'm thinking these are two different entities (the difference between this post, and the OP). The definition of "Son of God", as it relates to Jesus, means, IMO, that Jesus is the only one, to whom God is biologically related, and God only needed one, to be the Savior----whereas, "sons of God spoken of in the OT" could, I feel, be construed as "mankind" (as in, we are all God's children), and/or, those that God personally chose to be the leaders of His tribes, etc. (ie, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob), and/or, those that they, themselves, chose to follow God.I do not accept your view. God does not have a biology, he does not eat or defecate and the Nephalim were never designated as men in scriptures. Why do you think you need a savior? What do you think most of us have done to deserve eternal condemnation?
No.1, who said anything about Nephilim? Those are the only sons of God I know of in the O.T.
Do you know of others?
Quote:
No.2, I didn't say anything about my needing a savior.
Ok. I guess I miss-read your --- "IMO, that Jesus is the only one, to whom God is biologically related, and God only needed one, to be the Savior----whereas,"
So you do not think we are condemned or need a savior. Right?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No.3, It's not my place to decide who has done what, to deserve / not deserve eternal condemnation, so I don't.
[/quote]
Good. Neither do I. Being a Universalist, I see us all ending in heaven and not in some hell which is a religious invention.
Regards
DL