Is the West Coast overrated for LGBT people?

Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ] 

aikoinazuma
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 127

05 Mar 2018, 12:38 am

I've been wanting to talk about this for a very long time, like around 20 years or so. In fact, I wrote an essay offline about it but it's too long winded so I'll try to write a shorter version of what I wrote originally. To be honest it doesn't seem like the West Coast or the western USA is really that good for LGBT people, or at least what I have experienced. Here's some observations I have made:

It seems like there are many laws in the western states that aren't LGBT friendly, like that Proposition 8 which was passed by a big margin not too long ago as an example. I'm aware that California, Oregon, and Washington have anti-discrimination laws for LGBT people but those laws don't seem to be enforced very well. In fact, these states seem to not enforce laws very well as a whole and the whole West seems corrupt, to be honest. I won't even go into the crime and the crazy law enforcement out here.

Economically, much of the West Coast seems more focused on real estate and the industries that serve it. The 'tech' industry and entertainment industries only make up a relatively small percentage of California's GSP and both are fairly high turnover and seem to be past their prime. As for the other states, well, if you like farming then they're OK. Jobwise it's very difficult to get anything decent for a job out here at least from what I've seen and experienced.

As for the people, that's a whole entire forum itself. I'll be as nice as I can here but I have to be honest, westerners come across as very dysfunctional. It seems like a majority of them have everything from mental issues, drug problems, sloppy work ethics, telling sob stories and tall tales, cluelessness and the list goes on and on. I'm not bashing anyone here on WP about this but I've seen too much of this in the real world and a lot of people and groups out here don't act very friendly towards LGBT people from what I've seen. There are quite a few shady and fly-by-night businesses and institutions out here, not to mention the cults and weird religions.

I know it's not something people want to talk about but to me the problems with this half of the USA are too obvious. Again, I'm not complaining about anyone here but wanted to know what the experiences of the LGBT people here on WP are. Your thoughts?


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 107 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 131 of 200
You seem to have both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits.


starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

05 Mar 2018, 1:12 am

Well first off, I am a lesbian and dislike being lumped in with gay men, bisexuals, and trans people. We have different issues, and important differences can get overlooked if you lump us all together.

I have lived in California for almost all of my life, so I have no real basis for comparison. While I would feel relatively safe as a lesbian nearly anywhere in California, I fear I'd feel safe only in metropolitan areas of the South and Midwest. I am also not white-privileged or gender-conforming, and I can't really separate those from being a lesbian; they also strongly affect where I feel safe, so I'd definitely prefer Cali to anywhere in the South or Midwest as well as the really white Eastern states.

I don't go out a lot, so I can't say how realistic this is, but I would be concerned about places in metro Cali being "too liberal" in the sense of trying to include everyone in generic "LGBTQIA" stuff to the point of overlooking groups' individual needs (like inviting straight-privileged bisexuals and male trans people into lesbian spaces aka ignoring the need for individual lesbian and female space, or co-opting the experiences of intersexed people).

The crime here isn't really related to LGBT. I'd expect more LGBT-related crime in the South/Midwest. Social dysfunction, economy, etc. also aren't really related.



aikoinazuma
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 127

06 Mar 2018, 1:23 pm

starkid wrote:
Well first off, I am a lesbian and dislike being lumped in with gay men, bisexuals, and trans people. We have different issues, and important differences can get overlooked if you lump us all together.

I have lived in California for almost all of my life, so I have no real basis for comparison. While I would feel relatively safe as a lesbian nearly anywhere in California, I fear I'd feel safe only in metropolitan areas of the South and Midwest. I am also not white-privileged or gender-conforming, and I can't really separate those from being a lesbian; they also strongly affect where I feel safe, so I'd definitely prefer Cali to anywhere in the South or Midwest as well as the really white Eastern states.

I don't go out a lot, so I can't say how realistic this is, but I would be concerned about places in metro Cali being "too liberal" in the sense of trying to include everyone in generic "LGBTQIA" stuff to the point of overlooking groups' individual needs (like inviting straight-privileged bisexuals and male trans people into lesbian spaces aka ignoring the need for individual lesbian and female space, or co-opting the experiences of intersexed people).

The crime here isn't really related to LGBT. I'd expect more LGBT-related crime in the South/Midwest. Social dysfunction, economy, etc. also aren't really related.


I think you make a few good points here. I have not lived in California myself but live in a part of the west where there are quite a few CA expats here and it's possible that much of their behavior is not necessarily what goes on in CA itself. Culturally, the West Coast is quite different from where I come from originally. I have extended family on the East Coast and I hold probably more in common with them than I do with my relatives out here.

I do agree with you on how some 'liberal' groups will try to pigeonhole people into roles. It's funny since the West Coast isn't always what a lot of people would call politically 'liberal' on some issues. (I am personally not a believer in the whole left/right wing spectrum thing so it's more of a pro-LGBT vs anti-LGBT thing to me.)


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 107 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 131 of 200
You seem to have both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits.


infinitenull
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 628
Location: Home

07 Mar 2018, 7:25 pm

Meh... I don't think it's any better than say some of the northeast, but I would say both of them are definitely better than the south and midwest.

I think the southwest (NV,AZ,CO,NM,UT, not necessarily texas which is confusing unto itself) is perhaps somewhere in between the west coast and midwest in it's acceptance of LGBT+ folx. There is a strong sexually-conservative side in those areas but they also have to put up with a larger population of out people than say the mid-west would. So since they have to see them and work with them and be family memebrs with them they're more likely to realize we're all human in the end.

Whereas in the midwest and south as mentioned above... it's just plain scary to be out... even in the suburbs of a major metro area safety can get a little sketchy in the south.


_________________
Very high systematizing, low empathy, but moderate to high sympathy.
I do not experience cognitive dissonance reduction the way that other people do.
Professionally diagnosed in March 2018


aikoinazuma
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 127

06 Apr 2018, 2:08 pm

infinitenull wrote:
Meh... I don't think it's any better than say some of the northeast, but I would say both of them are definitely better than the south and midwest.

I think the southwest (NV,AZ,CO,NM,UT, not necessarily texas which is confusing unto itself) is perhaps somewhere in between the west coast and midwest in it's acceptance of LGBT+ folx. There is a strong sexually-conservative side in those areas but they also have to put up with a larger population of out people than say the mid-west would. So since they have to see them and work with them and be family memebrs with them they're more likely to realize we're all human in the end.

Whereas in the midwest and south as mentioned above... it's just plain scary to be out... even in the suburbs of a major metro area safety can get a little sketchy in the south.


The midwest isn't as bad as the south and in some aspects is actually better than the west coast from my experience. Furthermore the old south is similar to the northeast in that society is direct; if they don't like LGBT people, they are upfront on it.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 107 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 131 of 200
You seem to have both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits.


MM99
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 4 Jul 2016
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Posts: 50
Location: Spain

18 Apr 2018, 7:18 pm

This thread is confusing the s**t out of me xD I'm not American and have only been there once (in NYC) so I don't have first hand experience there, but I thought the Midwest was pretty liberal? I mean, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin have been pretty democratic for a long time. I thought they were far more proggresive than Utah is lol isn't Utah the Mormon state? And isn't New England and the Mid-Atlantic as proggresive as the West Coast?



infinitenull
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 628
Location: Home

18 Apr 2018, 8:53 pm

MM99 wrote:
This thread is confusing the s**t out of me xD I'm not American and have only been there once (in NYC) so I don't have first hand experience there, but I thought the Midwest was pretty liberal? I mean, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin have been pretty democratic for a long time. I thought they were far more proggresive than Utah is lol isn't Utah the Mormon state? And isn't New England and the Mid-Atlantic as proggresive as the West Coast?


Being democratic isn't automatically the same thing as being LGBT+ friendly. The democrats are starting to figure out that championing LGBT causes helps them to bring folx over to their side but even still there are plenty of democrats who are homophobic and transphobic. Democrats like to claim progressiveness, but really it's about as much of a sham as Republicans trying to claim to be financially conservative.

The midwest is somewhat geographically diverse as well. It's a combination of a few really big industrial cities and then a whoooole bunch of rural farm land and small towns and such. So that has an impact on the level of progressiveness

Then on top of all of the rest of that... US culture is really only about 3-5 years deep into people starting to be less likely to be grossed out by the very idea of gender and sexuality minorities. (90's-2015 USA=Dont ask don't tell level acceptance, post 2015="hey, I went to a gay bar because they were teaching salsa and people were nice" but still with some novelty to the whole idea)... we'll see what the future holds.


_________________
Very high systematizing, low empathy, but moderate to high sympathy.
I do not experience cognitive dissonance reduction the way that other people do.
Professionally diagnosed in March 2018


aikoinazuma
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 127

26 Apr 2018, 9:39 am

MM99 wrote:
This thread is confusing the s**t out of me xD I'm not American and have only been there once (in NYC) so I don't have first hand experience there, but I thought the Midwest was pretty liberal? I mean, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin have been pretty democratic for a long time. I thought they were far more proggresive than Utah is lol isn't Utah the Mormon state? And isn't New England and the Mid-Atlantic as proggresive as the West Coast?


For the most part those 4 Midwestern states are fairly pro-LGBT but you should stick to the cities and areas with a big city mentality. The Northeastern part of the US is mostly LGBT friendly but culturally quite different from the Midwest. If you have a more libertarian mindset the Northeast is NOT for you even if you are LGBT. The West Coast is somewhat tolerant of LGBT people but from my experiences is not as good as depicted in the media; many parts of the West Coast and a good chunk of the Western USA can be as hostile and in quite a few cases more hostile to LGBT people than the old South. (One example here: Southern California has a lot of extremist churches and they are notorious for being anti-LGBT. These churches are sometimes even avoided by the old South as they are considered hateful and in their mind "against the Lord's teachings".)

Yes, Utah is the state with the most Mormons living in it. Yes, Mormons are hostile to LGBT people as a whole, just calling it as it is.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 107 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 131 of 200
You seem to have both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits.


MushroomPrincess
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 335
Location: Turtle Island

30 Apr 2018, 10:13 pm

starkid wrote:
I would be concerned about places in metro Cali being "too liberal" in the sense of trying to include everyone in generic "LGBTQIA" stuff to the point of overlooking groups' individual needs (like inviting straight-privileged bisexuals and male trans people into lesbian spaces aka ignoring the need for individual lesbian and female space)

I have some trans male friends, and most of them are attracted to women, and had previously identified as lesbians before starting their transition and taking testosterone. They seem to have a lot of common experiences with cis lesbian women (in regards to both socialization and biology), so isn't it reasonable that they should have the same support networks as cis lesbians? :|



vaguelyhumanoid
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 1 Jun 2018
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 52
Location: Seattle

10 Jun 2018, 3:36 pm

This is very true, especially the observation about real estate. I've lived in Seattle all my life and I've seen the ways that the population boom brought on by real estate and tech companies has drained away the vibrant queer counterculture that once made the city feel so welcoming and alive. The queer, often neurodivergent homeless youth who I once made fast friends among (tho I'm not homeless myself) are being swept away (literally swept away!) to make room for more tacky condos and overpriced restaurants that don't give a s**t about people's dietary restrictions. It's hard to even walk thru Capitol Hill (once the queer neighborhood) anymore; all the nonprofit social centers are vanishing alongside the DIY art galleries and immigrant-owned family restaurants that I used to frequent.