Page 2 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 2:16 pm

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Explain even remotely how 'The Force Awakens' was "SJW."

'The Last Jedi' could be seen as dividing since it laid the blame on older generations, revolved around the military industrial complex, and attacked capitalism.

Before I respond let me see if you think the only SJW stuff in TLJ was the desecration of old generations and that capitalism casino stuff, because I can see like a lot more.


Then, state what they are in 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi' beyond what I just listed without mentioning race or gender.

Maybe you are a SJW to some level and you just see no problem with their ideologies. That's why you cannot see it. It also seems that in your opinion SJWs can do no wrong with policies about gender and race.
I will admit tho that at first I too didn't notice much, except for Vice Admiral Gender Studies. I am kinda slow.


This is clear avoidance. Point out what was "SJW" in 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi' without mentioning race or gender. You said it wasn't that the leads were female and black. Ok, so what were they then? It should be a very easy question to answer since you're that confident about it and I'm open to giving you the benefit of the doubt. Just without mentioning race or gender, what were they?

It's not avoidance, I am just a fan of the Socratic method. SJWs mostly whine about gender and race, and yet you want me to criticize them without mentioning it, it's a bit unfair. What I said that it's not because a lead being female or black, but I never said that it has nothing to do with it. Watched a Star Wars fan-film 2 days ago where the lead was a female and I liked it.


Race or gender as it pertains to identity, not ideology. As to say don't simply state the identity of the characters.

'Ghostbusters' would be SJW. Not because the leads were women and not because the genders of the cast were changed. Rather because it was (1) the only male characters were a male as the ditzy secretary and the villain - no strong counter examples or supporting characters given, (2) the villain was defeated literally by attacking his penis.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

14 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Race or gender as it pertains to identity, not ideology. As to say don't simply state the identity of the characters.

An ideology can pertain to identity though. :lol:
Quote:
'Ghostbusters' would be SJW. Not because the leads were women and not because the genders of the cast were changed. Rather because it was (1) the only male characters were a male as the ditzy secretary and the villain - no strong counter examples or supporting characters given, (2) the villain was defeated literally by attacking his penis.

Oh, we agree on something!



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 2:27 pm

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Race or gender as it pertains to identity, not ideology. As to say don't simply state the identity of the characters.

An ideology can pertain to identity though. :lol:
Quote:
'Ghostbusters' would be SJW. Not because the leads were women and not because the genders of the cast were changed. Rather because it was (1) the only male characters were a male as the ditzy secretary and the villain - no strong counter examples or supporting characters given, (2) the villain was defeated literally by attacking his penis.

Oh, we agree on something!


So, explain why in the same manner I did with 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

For example one other fallacy by the right that call those films out "the villains were white"... um, so are Han, Leia, and Luke. Plus, 'The Last Jedi' certainly wasn't concerned with "whites are bad, non-whites are good" since one of the chief antagonists in 'The Last Jedi' is hispanic.



Last edited by Spooky_Mulder on 14 Jun 2018, 2:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

14 Jun 2018, 2:37 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
So, explain why in the same manner I did with 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

For example one other fallacy by the right that call those films out "the villains were white"... um, so are Han, Leia, and Luke.

Han, Leia and Luke were protagonists in the original trilogy, seems a bit pointless to compare them to the new characters of the sequels. But being white is only the top of the iceberg, the new villains of the new trilogy are whiny, childish, angsty and generally not very frightening. And this is only what I had to say elaborating a point you brought out yourself. Oh and last sunday I voted for the commies, before you assume that I favour the (alt?) right.



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 2:42 pm

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
So, explain why in the same manner I did with 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

For example one other fallacy by the right that call those films out "the villains were white"... um, so are Han, Leia, and Luke.

Han, Leia and Luke were protagonists in the original trilogy, seems a bit pointless to compare them to the new characters of the sequels. But being white is only the top of the iceberg, the new villains of the new trilogy are whiny, childish, angsty and generally not very frightening. And this is only what I had to say elaborating a point you brought out yourself. Oh and last sunday I voted for the commies, before you assume that I favour the (alt?) right.


I meant Han, Leia, and Luke were all supporting characters in 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

The charaters not being white doesn’t make it SJW, unless the characters all being white in the first films is just (if not more) extremist as well.

I'd say you're right about the villains, but I wouldn't say that makes it SJW. Since SJW would mean there's a political or societal message behind that. Which that wouldn't be the case since the white good guys weren't depicted in that manner, only the new films hinted that the villains could be other than white (that a black Storm Trooper exists), and one of the lead villains in TLJ is hispanic.

Vice Admiral Holdo was an extreme feminist. However, in the book prior to the film - few characters wanted to be associated with her since they thought she was too odd. Plus, the film initially sets her up as a potential villain due to her oddity. So, she was portrayed as being a rather annoying/in-your-face character/person intentionally. While her character is redeemed, I still don't see how it illustrates her overall personality in a glowing rather than "more-cons-than-pros" way.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

14 Jun 2018, 3:11 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Han, Leia, and Luke were all supporting characters in 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

I'd say you're right about the villains, but I wouldn't say that makes it SJW. Since SJW would mean there's a political or societal message behind that. Which that wouldn't be the case since the white good guys weren't depicted in that manner, only the new films hinted that the villains could be other than white (that a black Storm Trooper exists), and one of the lead villains in TLJ is hispanic.

Vice Admiral Holdo was an extreme feminist. However, in the book prior to the film - few characters wanted to be associated with her since they thought she was too odd. Plus, the film initially sets her up as a potential villain due to her oddity. So, she was portrayed as being a rather annoying/in-your-face character/person intentionally. While her character is redeemed, I still don't see how it illustrates her overall personality in a glowing rather than "more-cons-than-pros" way.

They were supporting characters but they weren't created by the new directors. Moreover the former male lead pretty much got destroyed, with only the female lead and Harrison f'n Ford being ok.

You have to compare these white, angsty, whiny and vapid teens with the very carefully diversificated group of the main heroes. Also, even among these heroes, the females are the ones who always know better and resolve the situations while the guys are goofy, arrogant, wanna-be macho and cause problems. Even when Finn wanted to actually resolve something and sacrifice his life for the cause and his friends the directors had Rose hit his vehicle (which could have easily killed him along with her) and give us some lame speech about how it was wrong for some reason. :? I could even say that then she sexually abuses him. :lol:

Just like that Rose scene the directors try to redeem Holdo and it just doesn't make much sense, as you say. The worse thing is that the Disney personnel is accusing people who raise acceptable and motivated criticism as misogynists and racists alt-righters. Alex Becker and other Youtubers are much better at criticizing the movie than I am and are also funny, you might want to take a look at their videos about it.



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 3:54 pm

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Han, Leia, and Luke were all supporting characters in 'The Force Awakens' and 'The Last Jedi.'

I'd say you're right about the villains, but I wouldn't say that makes it SJW. Since SJW would mean there's a political or societal message behind that. Which that wouldn't be the case since the white good guys weren't depicted in that manner, only the new films hinted that the villains could be other than white (that a black Storm Trooper exists), and one of the lead villains in TLJ is hispanic.

Vice Admiral Holdo was an extreme feminist. However, in the book prior to the film - few characters wanted to be associated with her since they thought she was too odd. Plus, the film initially sets her up as a potential villain due to her oddity. So, she was portrayed as being a rather annoying/in-your-face character/person intentionally. While her character is redeemed, I still don't see how it illustrates her overall personality in a glowing rather than "more-cons-than-pros" way.

They were supporting characters but they weren't created by the new directors. Moreover the former male lead pretty much got destroyed, with only the female lead and Harrison f'n Ford being ok.

You have to compare these white, angsty, whiny and vapid teens with the very carefully diversificated group of the main heroes. Also, even among these heroes, the females are the ones who always know better and resolve the situations while the guys are goofy, arrogant, wanna-be macho and cause problems. Even when Finn wanted to actually resolve something and sacrifice his life for the cause and his friends the directors had Rose hit his vehicle (which could have easily killed him along with her) and give us some lame speech about how it was wrong for some reason. :? I could even say that then she sexually abuses him. :lol:

Just like that Rose scene the directors try to redeem Holdo and it just doesn't make much sense, as you say. The worse thing is that the Disney personnel is accusing people who raise acceptable and motivated criticism as misogynists and racists alt-righters. Alex Becker and other Youtubers are much better at criticizing the movie than I am and are also funny, you might want to take a look at their videos about it.


So your rather minor complaint is you want new rather than old white heroes.

The females are painted as stronger. That is true. Personally that doesn’t really get to me since I’m driven by impulse and relate to that. I can see how guys who aren’t could feel left out because of that though and how that could be seen negatively.

I don’t understand Rose stopping Finn either, then again I would have done what Finn wanted to do. The intention with Rose was off due to her motivations for doing it - she wasn’t built up enough for it to go that way.

With Holdo it does since she’s inherently good. I’d view her the same if she was an awkward guy. Basically don’t jump to conclusions about people. Then again, I’ve read the book which delved further .

I see these mostly as development rather than SJW issues though except to women being painted as stronger and men as pure impulse.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

14 Jun 2018, 4:39 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
So your rather minor complaint is you want new rather than old white heroes.
Always thinking good of people eh? I just want characters not to be modeled after SJW agendas.
Quote:
The females are painted as stronger. That is true. Personally that doesn’t really get to me since I’m driven by impulse and relate to that. I can see how guys who aren’t could feel left out because of that though and how that could be seen negatively.

What does it even mean that it doesn't get to you because you're not driven by impulse and relate to that? Against it's just them pushing their feminist propaganda.
Quote:
I don’t understand Rose stopping Finn either, then again I would have done what Finn wanted to do. The intention with Rose was off due to her motivations for doing it - she wasn’t built up enough for it to go that way.

She basicaly robbed him of his glory moment and even gave us a speech about how it was wrong, which didn't make sense. But I guess women are always right so...
Quote:
With Holdo it does since she’s inherently good. I’d view her the same if she was an awkward guy. Basically don’t jump to conclusions about people. Then again, I’ve read the book which delved further .

I see these mostly as development rather than SJW issues though except to women being painted as stronger and men as pure impulse.

Same with Holdo. I don't hate her, I hate them for wanting to push their agenda on us by using SW for it.



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 5:49 pm

No, I just think it’s a very minor gripe given that the originals are 99% white and the prequels 98% white. Also given that I’d prefer to have the old crew back than someone new. Sadly, you’ll likely get that in the next one though to even things out again like they have been. Saying sadly since Carrie Fischer undoubtably would have had a larger role in the next one and don’t see Luke being much of a presence (though could be wrong). Minor gripe since whites have it so amazing in regards to media representation compared to everyone else. It’d be like me, a 1%er, complaining about not having enough money with me at a certain moment - it’d just seem lacking in comparison to everyone else scra scrounging for any money at all.

Thinking more I think it’s also an inherent flaw in action heroes. How many can you think of that aren’t driven by impulse?

I can think of many impulsive ones, very few calculating ones outside of Bourne, Sherlock, Bond, and in some incarnations Batman. It just feels like most male action heroes (whether he’s the lead or the supporting to a female hero) is always driven by “shoot first, ask questions later” impulse. (One could say Iron Man per se, but while he’s smart he’s also very impulsive - to the point that it’s one of his weaknesses).

The most calculating character in the new SW films that I can think of would actually be Benecio Del Torro’s character - he expertly plays both sides.

————-

You voted for a Communist lately?

The right has used that word so much that I don’t know if you’re being sarcastic or not... meaning Democrat or farther left (Bernie type left).



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

14 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
No, I just think it’s a very minor gripe given that the originals are all white and the prequels 99% white. Also given that I’d prefer to have the old crew back than someone new. Sadly, you’ll likely get that in the next one though to even things out again like they have been. Saying sadly since Carrie Fischer undoubtably would have had a larger role in the next one and don’t see Luke being much of a presence (though could be wrong). Minor gripe since whites have it so amazing in regards to media representation compared to everyone else. It’d be like me, a 1%er, complaining about not having enough money with me at a certain moment - it’d just seem lacking in comparison to everyone else scrambling for any money.

Thinking more I think it’s also an inherent flaw in action heroes. How many can you think of that aren’t driven by impulse?

I can think of many impulsive ones, very few calculating ones outside of Bourne, Sherlock, Bond, and in some incarnations Batman. It just feels like most male action heroes (whether he’s the lead or the supporting to a female hero) is always driven by “shoot first, ask questions later” impulse. (One could say Iron Man per se, but while he’s smart he’s also very impulsive - to the point that it’s one of his weaknesses).

The most calculating character in the new SW films that I can think of would actually be Benecio Del Torro’s character - he expertly plays both sides.

————-

You voted for a Communist lately?

The right has used that word so much that I don’t know if you’re being sarcastic or not... meaning Democrat or farther left (Bernie type left).

Remember in what year the movies were made and also consider that white people are, and back then even more, the vast majority. However it is arguable that the strongest Jedi in all movies may actually be a black guy, who even grounds f*****g Sidious.
I get it now, but what does being impulsive have to do with being ok with perfect female characters and silly male ones?
I am not American but I think you only have right-wing parties there. Same with our main parties here.



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

14 Jun 2018, 8:26 pm

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
No, I just think it’s a very minor gripe given that the originals are all white and the prequels 99% white. Also given that I’d prefer to have the old crew back than someone new. Sadly, you’ll likely get that in the next one though to even things out again like they have been. Saying sadly since Carrie Fischer undoubtably would have had a larger role in the next one and don’t see Luke being much of a presence (though could be wrong). Minor gripe since whites have it so amazing in regards to media representation compared to everyone else. It’d be like me, a 1%er, complaining about not having enough money with me at a certain moment - it’d just seem lacking in comparison to everyone else scrambling for any money.

Thinking more I think it’s also an inherent flaw in action heroes. How many can you think of that aren’t driven by impulse?

I can think of many impulsive ones, very few calculating ones outside of Bourne, Sherlock, Bond, and in some incarnations Batman. It just feels like most male action heroes (whether he’s the lead or the supporting to a female hero) is always driven by “shoot first, ask questions later” impulse. (One could say Iron Man per se, but while he’s smart he’s also very impulsive - to the point that it’s one of his weaknesses).

The most calculating character in the new SW films that I can think of would actually be Benecio Del Torro’s character - he expertly plays both sides.

————-

You voted for a Communist lately?

The right has used that word so much that I don’t know if you’re being sarcastic or not... meaning Democrat or farther left (Bernie type left).

Remember in what year the movies were made and also consider that white people are, and back then even more, the vast majority. However it is arguable that the strongest Jedi in all movies may actually be a black guy, who even grounds f*****g Sidious.
I get it now, but what does being impulsive have to do with being ok with perfect female characters and silly male ones?
I am not American but I think you only have right-wing parties there. Same with our main parties here.


Didn’t mean to rag on the old movies just - “I want white male lead Star Wars films” - comes off as a small point since there’s already so many. Plus, there was just Solo.

That the male characters themselves (in all or most action movies) need to become more advanced. I think that the female characters are so complex just further highlights male depictions need to become 21st century now as well. Old school doesn’t work anymore and is noticeable (more so in films where the male is the supporting hero).

On that I’d say you’re correct though many right wingers and plenty of left ones sure would argue. Personally I like the UK’s form of government more than America - more people get to the table than over here.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

15 Jun 2018, 9:06 am

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Didn’t mean to rag on the old movies just - “I want white male lead Star Wars films” - comes off as a small point since there’s already so many. Plus, there was just Solo.

That the male characters themselves (in all or most action movies) need to become more advanced. I think that the female characters are so complex just further highlights male depictions need to become 21st century now as well. Old school doesn’t work anymore and is noticeable (more so in films where the male is the supporting hero).

On that I’d say you’re correct though many right wingers and plenty of left ones sure would argue. Personally I like the UK’s form of government more than America - more people get to the table than over here.

I don't really care if the lead is black or female, just stop making it all about SJW agenda and make better characters. I don't get why they decided they had to ruin SW but they let Marvel make ok movies.

I don't understand what you are talking about.

Don't really know much about the English system either.



Last edited by Peacesells on 15 Jun 2018, 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

15 Jun 2018, 9:20 am

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
No, I just think it’s a very minor gripe given that the originals are all white and the prequels 99% white. Also given that I’d prefer to have the old crew back than someone new. Sadly, you’ll likely get that in the next one though to even things out again like they have been. Saying sadly since Carrie Fischer undoubtably would have had a larger role in the next one and don’t see Luke being much of a presence (though could be wrong). Minor gripe since whites have it so amazing in regards to media representation compared to everyone else. It’d be like me, a 1%er, complaining about not having enough money with me at a certain moment - it’d just seem lacking in comparison to everyone else scrambling for any money.

Thinking more I think it’s also an inherent flaw in action heroes. How many can you think of that aren’t driven by impulse?

I can think of many impulsive ones, very few calculating ones outside of Bourne, Sherlock, Bond, and in some incarnations Batman. It just feels like most male action heroes (whether he’s the lead or the supporting to a female hero) is always driven by “shoot first, ask questions later” impulse. (One could say Iron Man per se, but while he’s smart he’s also very impulsive - to the point that it’s one of his weaknesses).

The most calculating character in the new SW films that I can think of would actually be Benecio Del Torro’s character - he expertly plays both sides.

————-

You voted for a Communist lately?

The right has used that word so much that I don’t know if you’re being sarcastic or not... meaning Democrat or farther left (Bernie type left).

Remember in what year the movies were made and also consider that white people are, and back then even more, the vast majority. However it is arguable that the strongest Jedi in all movies may actually be a black guy, who even grounds f*****g Sidious.
I get it now, but what does being impulsive have to do with being ok with perfect female characters and silly male ones?
I am not American but I think you only have right-wing parties there. Same with our main parties here.


Didn’t mean to rag on the old movies just - “I want white male lead Star Wars films” - comes off as a small point since there’s already so many. Plus, there was just Solo.

That the male characters themselves (in all or most action movies) need to become more advanced. I think that the female characters are so complex just further highlights male depictions need to become 21st century now as well. Old school doesn’t work anymore and is noticeable (more so in films where the male is the supporting hero).

On that I’d say you’re correct though many right wingers and plenty of left ones sure would argue. Personally I like the UK’s form of government more than America - more people get to the table than over here.


I have nothing to add, but, I just wanted to say I love your name.

Carry on.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

15 Jun 2018, 11:31 am

Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Didn’t mean to rag on the old movies just - “I want white male lead Star Wars films” - comes off as a small point since there’s already so many. Plus, there was just Solo.

That the male characters themselves (in all or most action movies) need to become more advanced. I think that the female characters are so complex just further highlights male depictions need to become 21st century now as well. Old school doesn’t work anymore and is noticeable (more so in films where the male is the supporting hero).

On that I’d say you’re correct though many right wingers and plenty of left ones sure would argue. Personally I like the UK’s form of government more than America - more people get to the table than over here.

I don't really care if the lead is black or female, just stop making it all about SJW agenda and make better characters. I don't get why they decided they had to ruin SW but they let Marvel make ok movies.

I don't understand what you are talking about.

Don't really know much about the English system either.


Impulsive heroes isn’t restricted to Star Wars. More male heroes need to be more calculating.

That said, seriously on the fence about Incredibles 2. It was as feminist driven as Ghostbusters. None of the guys in it were depicted as capable. Mr. Incredible kept on making mistakes as a hero and as a father. The action was great, just feels like a disappointment compared to what it could have been - every character pulling equal weight.



Peacesells
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Sep 2014
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,915
Location: Anzio, Italy

15 Jun 2018, 12:18 pm

Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
Spooky_Mulder wrote:
Didn’t mean to rag on the old movies just - “I want white male lead Star Wars films” - comes off as a small point since there’s already so many. Plus, there was just Solo.

That the male characters themselves (in all or most action movies) need to become more advanced. I think that the female characters are so complex just further highlights male depictions need to become 21st century now as well. Old school doesn’t work anymore and is noticeable (more so in films where the male is the supporting hero).

On that I’d say you’re correct though many right wingers and plenty of left ones sure would argue. Personally I like the UK’s form of government more than America - more people get to the table than over here.

I don't really care if the lead is black or female, just stop making it all about SJW agenda and make better characters. I don't get why they decided they had to ruin SW but they let Marvel make ok movies.

I don't understand what you are talking about.

Don't really know much about the English system either.


Impulsive heroes isn’t restricted to Star Wars. More male heroes need to be more calculating.

That said, seriously on the fence about Incredibles 2. It was as feminist driven as Ghostbusters. None of the guys in it were depicted as capable. Mr. Incredible kept on making mistakes as a hero and as a father. The action was great, just feels like a disappointment compared to what it could have been - every character pulling equal weight.

Yes but impulsive doesn't really mean that they have to be so stupid, and yes they have to stop with their propaganda. It's ruining everything. Do you play the SW mmorpg? You look like a big fan of the franchise.



Spooky_Mulder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,041
Location: NY

15 Jun 2018, 12:26 pm

With Star Wars, I don't see it as propaganda since I don't see them as any more or less impulsive than most action heroes are.

With Incredibles 2 - it's odd to see how it wasn't intentional. It basically opens with a kid being interrogated and having him say that powerful women aren't threatening since he's secure in his manhood. While Elastigirl is empowering - Mr. Incredible is shown as being a highly incapable father and as someone who's insecure with his manhood due to how much his wife's promotion gets to him. In the first film - Elastigirl said she wanted to be a fighter while Mr. Incredible said he wants to be a father, they should have ran with that and showed men can be capable stay at home dads without being close to having a mental breakdown. They could have shown women can handle themselves in a fight and men can be great and capable parents, truly modern - but they didn't. Stopping from perseverating --

Unsure what that Star Wars game is.