Trump testing positive: a different perspective
I am sure a lot of you said that Trump testing positive shows just how wrong he was when he was reckless about it. I would have said it myself, but since so many people already said it, what's the point in repeating it? But here is something different, that I bet nobody ever said:
a) The incident shows that Trump is honest, since he tweeted about it rather than hide it. What that tells you is that, back when he acted like covid isn't a big deal, it wasn't because he was lying; rather its because he honestly thought it wasn't a big deal. He is just the type of person who doesn't change his -- honest -- opinion easily. But once it changes then he is willing to be open about it.
b) A person with bad intentions would protect themselves while endangering others. But, as we saw, Trump didn't protect himself either. So it wasn't bad intentions, it was sincere mistake.
Well yes you can ask "how could he not know if many people were confronting him about it". Well here is how: he sincerely believed he was right and everyone else was wrong. Sure, this belief is stupid, but stupid doesn't mean evil. Imagine the situation that you are the only adult in a room filled with 5 year olds. Would you say, in this situation, that you are right and everyone in the room is wrong? I hope so. Well, the only problem is that senior medical specialists are not 5 year olds. But maybe Trump perceives them to be. And if he perceives something different from what it is, it's not his fault. You can't "choose" how you perceive something. If you look at a sky and see it red rather than blue it's not your choice either.
Like I said, him testing positive also said a bunch of bad things about him too (such as how wrong he was when he was reckless). But it all was said before. It is important to acknowledge some good things.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bob-woodward-rage-book-trump/2020/09/09/0368fe3c-efd2-11ea-b4bc-3a2098fc73d4_story.html
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,143
Location: Right over your left shoulder
You make a good point QFT, he could handle his current situation even more poorly. He could be ever worse than he is, his presidency could be worse and his approach to the pandemic could be worse. These aren't redeeming points in the slightest, but you're not wrong that they exist.
_________________
“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas, this is part of our strategy” —Netanyahu
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う
GOP Predators
Here's two statements:
I'm the president.
I'm 36.
The second one is true and I believe it. That does not mean I believed the first one when I wrote it, and there's no reason to come to that conclusion. They're independent, and you can only speculate about my motivations.
_________________
I can read facial expressions. I did the test.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,670
Location: Long Island, New York
Reckless is not a strong enough word
White House officials knew Hicks tested positive -- but Trump still traveled for a fundraiser
McEnany didn't wear a mask at the briefing, and made no mention of Hicks' diagnosis to reporters in the room, Collins said.
So the question is going to be for the White House, why did the President still go to New Jersey, knowing that he could potentially put these people at risk, these donors and fund raisers? And of course, why did the press secretary still hold a briefing despite knowing she had come into contact with somebody who had just tested positive for coronavirus?" Collins said.
The State University of New York just put in an edict that any student who tests positive and does not isolate, any student who comes in contact with somebody positive and does not quarantine is suspended or expelled with no refund. Yet these people let a person who is known to have tested positive on an airplane with a 74 year old president and his aides. WTF
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
White House officials knew Hicks tested positive -- but Trump still traveled for a fundraiser
McEnany didn't wear a mask at the briefing, and made no mention of Hicks' diagnosis to reporters in the room, Collins said.
So the question is going to be for the White House, why did the President still go to New Jersey, knowing that he could potentially put these people at risk, these donors and fund raisers? And of course, why did the press secretary still hold a briefing despite knowing she had come into contact with somebody who had just tested positive for coronavirus?" Collins said.
The State University of New York just put in an edict that any student who tests positive and does not isolate, any student who comes in contact with somebody positive and does not quarantine is suspended or expelled with no refund. Yet these people let a person who is known to have tested positive on an airplane with a 74 year old president and his aides. WTF
Actually this only confirms my point. The fact that Trump was willing to put *himself* in danger in such an obvious way, shows that when he was putting others in danger it wasn't because he was selfish rather it was because he *sincerely* wasn't taking it seriously.
_________________
Sure, but that alleviates him of the specific charge others *used to* lay on him. Sure, the new charge is also bad as far as presidential candidate goes, but that's an interesting twist
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,670
Location: Long Island, New York
White House officials knew Hicks tested positive -- but Trump still traveled for a fundraiser
McEnany didn't wear a mask at the briefing, and made no mention of Hicks' diagnosis to reporters in the room, Collins said.
So the question is going to be for the White House, why did the President still go to New Jersey, knowing that he could potentially put these people at risk, these donors and fund raisers? And of course, why did the press secretary still hold a briefing despite knowing she had come into contact with somebody who had just tested positive for coronavirus?" Collins said.
The State University of New York just put in an edict that any student who tests positive and does not isolate, any student who comes in contact with somebody positive and does not quarantine is suspended or expelled with no refund. Yet these people let a person who is known to have tested positive on an airplane with a 74 year old president and his aides. WTF
Actually this only confirms my point. The fact that Trump was willing to put *himself* in danger in such an obvious way, shows that when he was putting others in danger it wasn't because he was selfish rather it was because he *sincerely* wasn't taking it seriously.
Maybe Trump was thinking being fearless, toughing it out would help his campaign
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
White House officials knew Hicks tested positive -- but Trump still traveled for a fundraiser
McEnany didn't wear a mask at the briefing, and made no mention of Hicks' diagnosis to reporters in the room, Collins said.
So the question is going to be for the White House, why did the President still go to New Jersey, knowing that he could potentially put these people at risk, these donors and fund raisers? And of course, why did the press secretary still hold a briefing despite knowing she had come into contact with somebody who had just tested positive for coronavirus?" Collins said.
The State University of New York just put in an edict that any student who tests positive and does not isolate, any student who comes in contact with somebody positive and does not quarantine is suspended or expelled with no refund. Yet these people let a person who is known to have tested positive on an airplane with a 74 year old president and his aides. WTF
Actually this only confirms my point. The fact that Trump was willing to put *himself* in danger in such an obvious way, shows that when he was putting others in danger it wasn't because he was selfish rather it was because he *sincerely* wasn't taking it seriously.
Maybe Trump was thinking being fearless, toughing it out would help his campaign
But he wasn't advertising the fact that he was on a plane with Hicks.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,881
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,881
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
That wasn't due to selfishness -- since he was reckless about himself just as much.
I think all three applied when Trump decided wearing a mask was a political stand against him personally.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
That wasn't due to selfishness -- since he was reckless about himself just as much.
I think all three applied when Trump decided wearing a mask was a political stand against him personally.
Yeah, but why getting on a plane with someone diagnosed with covid? Since it wasn't videotaped or anything, there would have been no personal implications for him if he were to simply decline to let that person on a plane. So apparently he truly thought it wasn't so bad.
By the way, as a narcissist, he could have had some ego boost by saying "no, you are not allowed on my plane". He chose not to do that and, instead, he was being all nice and inclusive
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,881
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
That wasn't due to selfishness -- since he was reckless about himself just as much.
I think all three applied when Trump decided wearing a mask was a political stand against him personally.
Yeah, but why getting on a plane with someone diagnosed with covid? Since it wasn't videotaped or anything, there would have been no personal implications for him if he were to simply decline to let that person on a plane. So apparently he truly thought it wasn't so bad.
By the way, as a narcissist, he could have had some ego boost by saying "no, you are not allowed on my plane". He chose not to do that and, instead, he was being all nice and inclusive
Did he know Hicks had the virus at the time? If he did, then he truly is an idiot for believing his own crap about Covid not being the threat silly liberals and other believers in science had said it was.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
We officially have a Biden-Trump rematch |
06 Mar 2024, 8:18 pm |
What if Nixon Era Satire Becomes Trump Era reality? |
Today, 7:39 am |
SCOTUS: Trump to stay on ballots |
06 Mar 2024, 2:18 pm |
Man LIGHTS HIMSELF ON FIRE outside Trump Trial |
22 Apr 2024, 9:20 pm |