Naming kids
Dad names newborn "Sarah McCain Palin Ciptak" without telling mom - they'd previously agreed to Ava Grace Ciptak
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/ive-ca ... 68379.html
I've heard many cases where the father recorded a different name than what was previously agreed to and that became the kids legal name.
Why is the father given the right to choose the name without the mothers consent? Unless its the case of a single parent (in which case it should be the mom who is the only one present) then both parents signatures should be obtained before the baby is legally named
And just think what this child is going to have deal with for the rest of her life, if mcain-palin get elected and some scandal happens with one of them, particularly Sarahl.
Don't think that's likely - how would you feel if your name was William Jefferson Clinton Smith?
The same reason that the mom is given the right to abort a child without the father's consent - it's nobody else's business.
_________________
I distinctly remember both of us having to sign the certificates on which our children were legally named, given that we were both available to sign.
But that may not be the case everywhere.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
The same reason that the mom is given the right to abort a child without the father's consent - it's nobody else's business.
Naming a child is not a paternal right.
M.
_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.
For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/ive-ca ... 68379.html
I've heard many cases where the father recorded a different name than what was previously agreed to and that became the kids legal name.
Why is the father given the right to choose the name without the mothers consent? Unless its the case of a single parent (in which case it should be the mom who is the only one present) then both parents signatures should be obtained before the baby is legally named
there are cases in single parents when it is just ther dad
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/ive-ca ... 68379.html
I've heard many cases where the father recorded a different name than what was previously agreed to and that became the kids legal name.
Why is the father given the right to choose the name without the mothers consent? Unless its the case of a single parent (in which case it should be the mom who is the only one present) then both parents signatures should be obtained before the baby is legally named
there are cases in single parents when it is just ther dad
Not at the time of birth
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/ive-ca ... 68379.html
I've heard many cases where the father recorded a different name than what was previously agreed to and that became the kids legal name.
Why is the father given the right to choose the name without the mothers consent? Unless its the case of a single parent (in which case it should be the mom who is the only one present) then both parents signatures should be obtained before the baby is legally named
there are cases in single parents when it is just ther dad
Not at the time of birth
actually yes they can...
stop thinking...
optimistacally...
And you will understand
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Feel conflicted about having kids and not having kids |
05 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm |