Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Jonny
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 440
Location: London

07 May 2007, 2:41 am

If you need to use Windows apps which arent power hungry you can run it under emulation with Parallels so no need to reboot to get into windows!



nocturnalowl
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2005
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Location: The Bathrooms, California

10 May 2007, 4:08 am

I use a Mac also, although it is an older one. So I would say buy a Mac if:

-You have the money.
-Want to feel less geeky and don't want to do too much of the geeky things.
-Want to feel less worried about viruses, and security (Doesn't mean Macs are completly immune though)


Go for a PC if:

-You want to be a gamer.
-Like to tweak and mingle with hardware. (Imacs, Mac Minis, and the laptops are a little more difficult for even basic part replacements, except maybe adding memory or maybe a Wireless AirPort card) The MacPros allow replacing Hard Drives and graphic cards and other PCIe peripherals, but those machines cost more.



chadders
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 354

13 May 2007, 5:26 pm

To be honest I support neither. It depends on a lot of variables. The major one in this case is have you used a Mac computer before / know how to use one efficiently? I ask this because learning a new OS does take a little time especially when all the keyboard buttons are different, one mouse button not 2 etc...

If you have used one (efficiently) before then I recommend a Mac, otherwise I would recommend a PC.


_________________
- Chadders

That's my two pence worth.


ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

13 May 2007, 6:18 pm

chadders wrote:
To be honest I support neither. It depends on a lot of variables. The major one in this case is have you used a Mac computer before / know how to use one efficiently? I ask this because learning a new OS does take a little time especially when all the keyboard buttons are different, one mouse button not 2 etc...

If you have used one (efficiently) before then I recommend a Mac, otherwise I would recommend a PC.


The default mouse for mac now has two logical buttons and the keys aren't that different.



chadders
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 354

15 May 2007, 4:44 am

I more meant keyboard short-cuts etc... I use them all the time on my PC. Although I guess that's an OS thing. Linux replicates a lot of Windows keyboard short-cuts.


_________________
- Chadders

That's my two pence worth.


CobaltFire
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: California

16 May 2007, 5:38 pm

Hey all, just thought I'd throw my $0.02 in here.

First things first, graphics card: If this is truly image editing, and not anything OpenGL based, then an integrated or non-intergrated card is not that big of an issue. I still, however, prefer a non-integrated (colors and refresh tend to be much more accurate and easier to work with). On that note, a Quadro is just a GeForce that is more reliable and typically has more memory, along with slightly differently tuned drivers. The actual chips are not really any different.

Second thing: Is an AIO (all-in-one) suitable? If so, a 24" iMac with the 7600GT video card and 2GB RAM should make a perfect machine for what you want to do. It has a decent video card, a good processor, and a rather nice, large screen. A 20" with the 7300GT might be ok, but the 7300 is considerably slower than the 7600, if that is what you are worried about.

Third: To run Windows on a Mac does NOT require a second HDD, that's what Boot Camp is for. It runs it off of the same HDD.

I hope this helps.


_________________
It is better to be hated for who you are than loved for who you are not.


ahayes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,506

16 May 2007, 10:18 pm

She said her app has a mac version now. And I'm pretty sure it does need a dedicated video card.



Gilb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,214

17 May 2007, 3:26 pm

CobaltFire wrote:
Hey all, just thought I'd throw my $0.02 in here.

First things first, graphics card: If this is truly image editing, and not anything OpenGL based, then an integrated or non-intergrated card is not that big of an issue. I still, however, prefer a non-integrated (colors and refresh tend to be much more accurate and easier to work with). On that note, a Quadro is just a GeForce that is more reliable and typically has more memory, along with slightly differently tuned drivers. The actual chips are not really any different.

Second thing: Is an AIO (all-in-one) suitable? If so, a 24" iMac with the 7600GT video card and 2GB RAM should make a perfect machine for what you want to do. It has a decent video card, a good processor, and a rather nice, large screen. A 20" with the 7300GT might be ok, but the 7300 is considerably slower than the 7600, if that is what you are worried about.

Third: To run Windows on a Mac does NOT require a second HDD, that's what Boot Camp is for. It runs it off of the same HDD.

I hope this helps.

actually she is looking at using Bitplane Imaris which would need a quadro rather than a geforce