First full genome sequenced from Old Kingdom Egyptian

Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

cyberdora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,058
Location: Australia

05 Jul 2025, 11:24 pm

Scientists have sequenced the oldest and most complete genome from ancient Egypt — and the DNA reveals that a man who lived 5,000 years ago had roots in both Mesopotamia and North Africa, a new study finds.
https://www.livescience.com/archaeology ... esopotamia
The individual's body was first recovered from a tomb in Nuwayrat, in Upper Egypt, in 1902. The team then compared the man's genome against a database of 4,000 other people's DNA — 3,233 people from the present day, and 805 ancient people.

The profile is 80% Mahgrib (north African), 20% levant (near middle eastern) and 0% Subsaharan African is somewhat surprising given the current location of the tomb is Nubia in upper Egypt whose current population is predominantly subsaharan African.

Despite this scientific breakthrough, and perhaps due to current political sensitivities, Sally Wasef, a palaeogeneticist at Queensland University of Technology, said that while the researchers' DNA extraction was sound, she thought they might have drawn too many conclusions from their ancestry analysis. "It's just one individual that has been moved outside of Egypt." there was still plenty of well-preserved DNA from other mummies found in ancient Egyptian tombs.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/202 ... /105478316



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,524

Today, 1:46 pm

It's amazing what they can do these days.



cyberdora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,058
Location: Australia

Today, 6:28 pm

^^^ I do wonder how accurate the gene mapping is?

Current genome mapping in 23&me and ancestry.com, for example, reveals broad grouping but is suspect as it tends to lump people into whole categories for whom the database is sparse (e.g. South and east Asians) and is not accurate for twins where ancestry should be identical but isn't.