Board index › Topical Discussion › Computers, Math, Science, and Technology

Study: ChatGPT is Bad for Your Brain

Page 6 of 6 [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Previous topic | Next topic

blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,484

Yesterday, 8:57 am

funeralxempire wrote:
blitzkrieg wrote:
The peanut gallery?

And I suppose you would imagine that you might sit in a roof covered balcony seat, or the executive box, perhaps? :lol:


No, I believe in this case I was in a minor, on-stage role. :nerdy:

That's why I've tried saying how it looks from the inside, rather than from the outside.

babybird wrote:
I'm just saying how it looks from the outside mate

You know, the peanut gallery


Oh, I see what you mean now.

I had forgotten about babybird's mention of peanut gallery. I thought that you were mentioning the term for the first time.



blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,484

Yesterday, 9:01 am

Cornflake wrote:
LMGTFY -
Quote:
Origin:
The term "peanut gallery" emerged from vaudeville theaters where the uppermost or rearmost seats (the cheapest) were often occupied by a rowdy audience who would throw peanuts at performers.
Figurative Meaning:
Over time, the term evolved to describe anyone whose opinions are considered inconsequential or unwarranted.


I imagined that FXE was implying my opinion was inconsequential, when he quoted you responding to my previous post, hence my questioning of his peanut gallery comment.



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,533
Location: Right over your left shoulder

Yesterday, 9:06 am

blitzkrieg wrote:
Oh, I see what you mean now.

I had forgotten about babybird's mention of peanut gallery. I thought that you were mentioning the term for the first time.


Yeah, I don't think I'm self-aggrandizing enough to use it in the manner you presumed, the emoticon was supposed to be more self-deprecating than serious.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,484

Yesterday, 9:10 am

To make matters more confusing, I couldn't see whatever image you posted.

Here is what your post looked like from my end:

Image



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,533
Location: Right over your left shoulder

Yesterday, 9:12 am

blitzkrieg wrote:
To make matters more confusing, I couldn't see whatever image you posted.

Here is what your post looked like from my end:

Image


Oh, that makes me a sad panda. The aristocratic emoticon is my favourite. *sad noble noises*


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Just a reminder: under international law, an occupying power has no right of self-defense, and those who are occupied have the right and duty to liberate themselves by any means possible.


blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,484

Yesterday, 9:13 am

funeralxempire wrote:
blitzkrieg wrote:
To make matters more confusing, I couldn't see whatever image you posted.

Here is what your post looked like from my end:

Image


Oh, that makes me a sad panda. The aristocratic emoticon is my favourite. *sad noble noises*


:lol:



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 70,676
Location: Over there

Today, 7:04 am

It's weird - that image doesn't render for me either, from that source. I have a similar issue with Twitter images when posted inside the [img] tags.

But it's not like there's an issue with the image/source itself - clicking on it "naked" and untagged works fine:
http://www.narusaku.com/public/style_em ... itably.gif

Enclose it in [img] tags, and (here, anyway) you get the "broken image" graphic instead -
Image

A screencap of how it looks:

Image


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.