Rudin wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Actually, it takes less energy to not respond than to respond at all. If the OP is making comments, then it is because he wants to, he chooses to, and he does it. It's no one's fault but his own.
I think the OP has an addiction. It is also not true that it takes less energy to respond than to not respond. Ever hear of OCD? (rhetorical)
Okay, point accepted.
Aren't there medications for OCD? Just askin' ...
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.