Where are the flying cars?

Page 3 of 4 [ 58 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Previous topic | Next topic

auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,795
Location: the island of defective toy santas

15 Dec 2010, 11:06 pm

screw flying cars, i wanna waveform discriminator

greengeek
Velociraptor

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 434
Location: New York USA

15 Dec 2010, 11:22 pm

LordoftheMonkeys wrote:

We do have flying cars. They're called airplanes.

Yes it would be easier to make a flying car out of an airplane and not a car. Like it would be easier to build an amphibious car out of a boat and not a car, as the boat floats better and the plane flies better than a car.

_________________
Nothing is fool proof only fool resistant

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

16 Dec 2010, 3:41 am

See http://www.roadabletimes.com/

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Dec 2010, 3:55 am

LordoftheMonkeys wrote:

We do have flying cars. They're called airplanes.

Most airplanes function very badly on the ground. They need too much room to roll about. Look how airports and airfields are spread out.

ruveyn

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

16 Dec 2010, 9:39 am

ruveyn wrote:

LordoftheMonkeys wrote:

We do have flying cars. They're called airplanes.

Most airplanes function very badly on the ground.

My father used to fly, and I once commented about the badly-worn tires on his airplane ... and he told me the craft was intended for flying, not driving!

My brother owns a house in the Florida Keys where the streets around the airstrip in front of his house actually used to be considered taxiways where autos had to yield right-of-way to aircraft.

On TV, I recently saw a new combo auto-aircraft that was actually quite impressive. Hydraulics could fold the wings back (kind of like a grasshopper) so it could be driven around as an auto ... but I would not want to be in it either on the ground or in the air during high wind.

_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================

Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

16 Dec 2010, 3:27 pm

When I was a kid it was exciting to imagine what it might be like in the 21st Century. Would I grow up to see flying cars? Skies full of holograms? Technology to help people live longer and age better? Nah... mostly just a bunch of cholesterol-devouring redneck mutants, like before.

bearshady
Butterfly

Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 13
Location: Somewhere between the E and F layers...

16 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm

(Note: I am a professional truck driver)

Until the masses (talking about people in general, not pointing fingers at anyone) learn to control GROUND-BASED vehicles with more skill than presently displayed, Goddess save us if they see fit to operate an airborne vehicle. Flying vehicles DO have their advantages (not having to stick to paved roadways, higher speeds). BUT...when 2 or more of those try to occupy the same spot in the air.... it's not just OOPS!....when you hit the ground, you stop NOW. The human body can't take an infinity G-force stop.

I'll save the gory details.

_________________
--... ...-- -.. . .-- --... -..- ..-.

LordoftheMonkeys
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 927
Location: A deep,dark hole in the ground

16 Dec 2010, 4:45 pm

Xeno wrote:

So you don't consider smart phones, hybrid cars, 3D movies, and the internet to be technological advancements? Wow, you're hard to please.

_________________
I don't want a good life. I want an interesting one.

Xeno
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 828

16 Dec 2010, 5:31 pm

LordoftheMonkeys wrote:

Xeno wrote:

So you don't consider smart phones, hybrid cars, 3D movies, and the internet to be technological advancements? Wow, you're hard to please.

Yeah, I do. I was just in a cynical mood, I guess, heh.

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

16 Dec 2010, 11:51 pm

bearshady wrote:

I have a pilot's license and have experience in small aircraft. No doubt imbeciles can and will kill themselves and others with their vehicles but in general, with reasonable care, the danger in flying is for the pilot and passengers whereas, although vehicle to vehicle accidents do happen they are a rarity in the air in contrast to the daily occurrence in ground vehicles. There is still an awful lot of room up there and I found flying much safer than driving. The problem is on the ground in getting to and from airports.

greengeek
Velociraptor

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 434
Location: New York USA

16 Dec 2010, 11:55 pm

Sand wrote:

bearshady wrote:

Also drunk pilots are also a problem, which maybe why a lot of small planes crash.

_________________
Nothing is fool proof only fool resistant

Sand
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

17 Dec 2010, 7:13 am

greengeek wrote:

Sand wrote:

bearshady wrote:

Also drunk pilots are also a problem, which maybe why a lot of small planes crash.

They're not a problem for long. Landings require reasonably fast reflexes and so they disappear fast. Anybody stupid enough to drink and fly will have no problems of being pulled over for a breath test.

Bleu
Blue Jay

Joined: 6 Jun 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 89

17 Dec 2010, 12:14 pm

When I was a kid I thought the year 2000 will be full of magical sci-fi-like stuff like holograms, jetpacks and most importantly TELEPORTS, but alas Not that techology hasn't advanced, I'm just saying having a replicator/nifty stuff would be very nice.

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

17 Dec 2010, 2:53 pm

greengeek wrote:

Somebody did build a flying 1971 Ford Pinto in 1973 but the wings came off and it fell out of the sky and crashed into the ground.

http://www.cookieboystoys.com/mizar.htm
http://www.flixxy.com/mizar-air-car.htm

Definitely an interesting project, and its attached parachute was *supposed* to make it possible for the entire craft to come down safely!

_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================

Jono
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,668
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

17 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm

leejosepho wrote:

greengeek wrote:

Somebody did build a flying 1971 Ford Pinto in 1973 but the wings came off and it fell out of the sky and crashed into the ground.

That looks like something out of a James Bond movie.

naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

27 Dec 2010, 9:31 pm

richie wrote:

We don't have flying cars for the simple reason that we don't need them. Same goes for jet-packs.
Check out the most recent edition of Wired Magazine: "The Future That Wasn't".

For real.
We need rail mass transit, and electric, or hybrid, ground bound cars.

Not flying cars.

Imagine drunk driving, texting, road rage, and car jacking in a world of flying cars.

The energy needed to power flying cars would be dozens of times that of a conventional gas guzzling cady or SUV.

America would be even more enslaved by oil exporting countries than we are now.
No need to lament the nonexistence of flying cars.

Page 3 of 4 [ 58 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

Jump to:

Where are the flying cars? Post Reply New Topic

Where are the flying cars?