Faster Than Light conundrum Help appreciated

Post Reply New Topic

This is supposed to be a section of science and technology and you are talking about souls? There is not an iota of physical evidence than consciousness or persona survive the death of the body. The "soul" if anything is what the prefrontal cortex of the brain does. Once the brain has been reduced to mush rot after death there is no soul. ruveyn

I said i am fine with this current debate. I thought i had said that.
In my opinion teleporting is fine. If your brain was assembled the exact same way you would have all the same memory's and thus your soul. a soul is something people have but not a physical thing. if you are a human then you have one. So teleporting would bring your soul with you.

I am looking to write a books not play a game though.

Why are you viewing consciousness as some sort of singular continuous phenomenon? Unless the soul exists, that seems a rather absurd interpretation. It seems much more probable, as I mentioned in an earlier quoted response, that consciousness exists as a series of discrete 'units'. In which case, your consciousness is ALREADY being 'destroyed' and replaced, moment by moment, and one could even go further as to say that most of the time you're not conscious (but since you're not aware of the time you're not conscious, it seems to you that you're conscious all of the time). There would be nothing fundamentally different between this and what you're describing as happening in a transporter, except that the time gap between one moment of consciousness and the next would be longer.

Essentially, my basic point is that identity as you seem to be defining it is an illusion. As long as the correlates of that illusion are preserved by the transporter, what comes out the other end can still be said to be 'you' by any reasonable perspective and in exactly the same sense as the thing that went in.

One interesting thought:
My point is that the prosess of reducing someone into information in the transporter by deconstructing them down to the atoms they are made of is basicly the same as to vaporaze them with, lets say a phaser, just that a copy is being reconstructed aferwards. But if it doesn't matter wether it is a copy or not as long as the one that comes out is completely similar to the one that was destroyed(which would imply that, if the transported person were not destroyed, that he or she and the copy would both be the same individual), then the same principle can be used to bring someone back to life if they die or are being killed. You only need to have information about their "pattern" stored somewhere.
Why did no one think of that when lt. Tasha Yar died(Link: Star Trek: The Next Generation [TNG]: Season 1 Episode 23 - Skin Of Evil)

I think Star Trek is rife with examples of technology having its potential wasted, ignored or forgotten about.

White's work is important because Alcubierre's original equations called for a torus of exotic matter massing approximately as much as the planet Jupiter. White fiddled with the equations, and found that if you oscillate the edges of the warp bubble and assume a flattened toroid rather than a full donut, you can put a craft 30 meters across into warp with only 500 kilos of exotic matter. (Of course, we still have no idea how to make 500 kilos of exotic matter, but at one time we had no idea how to make carbon nanotubes, so...)

Perhaps your faster aliens have found other solutions - Alcubierre's drive works at 10c. That means that if Gliese 667c does indeed host life-bearing planets in its Goldilocks zone, it would still take 2.2 years to get there. The faster aliens might have a drive that goes faster, similar to the difference in Niven's Known Space stories between the standard FTL drive (three days per lightyear, no more, no less) and the Quantum II drive developed by the puppeteers (one lightyear every hour and fifteen minutes - the puppeteers themselves never flew it, because they're, ah, famously prudent).

Alcubierres's work is speculation based on what is mathematically possible. There is not a gram of real physical evidence that supports it. ruveyn