What if we could transfer our conscious into a computer?

Page 5 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

29 Jan 2013, 7:15 am

auntblabby wrote:
that reminds me of "brainstorm."


?
:study:



ScrewyWabbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,158

29 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm

ruveyn wrote:
ScrewyWabbit wrote:
A good sci-fi book on this is Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan - in the book your memeories can be downloaded into a computerized "stack" and re-implanted into another body - in fact it even makes interstellar "travel" possible since the contents of a stack can be transmitted over long distances.


The transmission would still be limited to speeds less then or equal to the speed of light.

ruveyn


Yes, I don't recall all the details of the book but I think for instance there were initially some explorers to relatively nearby stars (like Alpha Centauri) at fast but still sub-light speeds. They brought with them the equipment to receive the transmissions of these "stacks" of memories . I seem to recall in the book that these transmissions somehow occurred faster than light, but if so I don't think there was really much detail about how it was supposed to happen.

In any case the interesting part of the book is how these downloadable memories could lead to a kind of immortality - at least for the wealthy who could afford new bodies and who could have their stacks backed up periodically - if you died you could be restored either to whatever was current in your stack if the physical stack (located in the base of the skull) survived your death - but if your death was violent and the physical stack was damaged, you could only be restored to life if your stack was backed up outside of your body at a backup center - and then only with memories as of the time of the most recent backup. So this tended in the book to take away some of the stigma of murder, and lead to the concept of "real death" in the sense of threatening to kill someone and destroy their stack if they didn't have a backup, as opposed to a "fake" death in which their memories would survive to be implanted in another body, even if their current body were to be killed.



Ozoro
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

29 Jan 2013, 8:16 pm

Considering that the brain is on the basic level just electric and chemical signals, creating a copy is feasible. However we do not understand nearly enough about the brain yet. If we did know that much about the brain I'm sure we would be at the point where any conditions of the brain would be possible to fix which would make the need for a copy of our brains obsolete.



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,251
Location: the island of defective toy santas

30 Jan 2013, 5:35 am

BlackSabre7 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
that reminds me of "brainstorm."


?
:study:

brainstorm was a 1982 movie about an experimental apparatus which could copy/record thoughts/experience memories out of people's heads, and transfer those thoughts to another brain. it was a quasi-technological horror movie.



BlackSabre7
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 943
Location: Queensland, Australia

30 Jan 2013, 7:29 am

auntblabby wrote:
BlackSabre7 wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
that reminds me of "brainstorm."


?
:study:

brainstorm was a 1982 movie about an experimental apparatus which could copy/record thoughts/experience memories out of people's heads, and transfer those thoughts to another brain. it was a quasi-technological horror movie.




OK, looked it up on wiki. It rings a bell. Think I saw it in my teens.
Thanks! :D