digger1 wrote:
That's the way it's headed, sure. Well, the San Fransisco area, anyway...
I'm not sure if that's true. This is my understanding from briefly reading about it: some distance from the area to the north and south you've got subduction of the Pacific plate beneath the continent. California, however, is generally experiencing shear with the land nearest the coast moving NW. To the south, the spur of land to the west of the Gulf of California was initially displaced from further south by that shear, although also experienced rotation about the north end as that became locked with the mainland again, opening the Gulf. The complicating factor is the interaction of the East Pacific Rise (a spreading centre in the oceanic plate), that's also acting to open the Gulf. That's moved towards the American continent and has been partially subducted.
Overall, however, the prevalent forces are compressional along that coast of the Pacific, and most of the land is composed of various accreted terranes, so I'm not sure if the assertion that California will become an island is correct, although the situation is fairly complicated. Of course, on a shorter timescale glacio-eustatic mechanisms could act to give the same result. I know there's a low area to the west of the Sierra Nevada, and if there's an opening to the sea, that could flood. I don't know enough about the area, though, so someone else could comment.