CloudWalker wrote:
Mostly agree. Only that it's hard to find an optimal size for ram disk. Whatever the amount of memory set aside isn't available for other applications. Some (actually quite a lot) of programs could make use of that memory more efficiently. You also lose whatever theoretical bebefit a browser's disk cache has. (Namely not having to download everything from a web site you visited before)
How little memory do you think I have?

My ram disk automatically resizes, with a maximum of 1 gig. Firefox never uses that much. The ram disk is available to other things too, if I choose.
Currently my software is consuming 417 megs or 10.8 percent of my ram. I'm hard pressed to get it over 1.5, let alone touching all four gigs. I'm saturating about 15% split between two CPUs. I have lots and lots of computer to spare.
Quote:
Surfing is entirely bandwidth bond, so saving a few disk access wouldn't matter much. Frankly I won't bother with ram drive unless the hd is SSD. And fragmentation aren't that problematic until the hd is filled to a certain level anyway. (Now that you mention it, I'm sorry to detract a bit. I've been looking for some time now, is there any decent defrag program for linux?)
I believe when it does its integrity check it marks things to be sorted on the fly. Assuming you use ext3 or ext4. Defrag is not much of an issue anyway with journalling.
[quote
And I just realized that the thread started out as a privacy question, in that case, using a ram drive could reduce the chance of someone discovering your hidden secret.[/quote]
Yeah, we are keeping to topic. Barely.
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.