Is this website completely pseudoscientific/a pisstake?
Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ]
http://www.eoht.info/
I've been reading into thermodyamics, and wanted to read about the thermodynamic properties of an organism. I stumbled on this bizzare site. There certainly is a lot of BS on there (http://www.eoht.info/page/Human+chemistry), but is this website an obvious pisstake/new age rubbish, or is it genuine??
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
ryan93 wrote:
http://www.eoht.info/
I've been reading into thermodyamics, and wanted to read about the thermodynamic properties of an organism. I stumbled on this bizzare site. There certainly is a lot of BS on there (http://www.eoht.info/page/Human+chemistry), but is this website an obvious pisstake/new age rubbish, or is it genuine??
I've been reading into thermodyamics, and wanted to read about the thermodynamic properties of an organism. I stumbled on this bizzare site. There certainly is a lot of BS on there (http://www.eoht.info/page/Human+chemistry), but is this website an obvious pisstake/new age rubbish, or is it genuine??
I think it is a genuine attempt to gain a diversity of ideas on how thermodynamics might affect the human condition. One might find a real jewel among the ideas, relevant to something completely different a person might be interested in, so I personally see value there.
I find the format of the web page chaotic. Like a wall of text sprinkled with pictures, but not much space to separate different ideas.
The individual articles seem better organized, but not organzied nearly as well as the Wiki site.
Quote:
I think it is a genuine attempt to gain a diversity of ideas on how thermodynamics might affect the human condition. One might find a real jewel among the ideas, relevant to something completely different a person might be interested in, so I personally see value there.
I find the format of the web page chaotic. Like a wall of text sprinkled with pictures, but not much space to separate different ideas.
The individual articles seem better organized, but not organzied nearly as well as the Wiki site.
I find the format of the web page chaotic. Like a wall of text sprinkled with pictures, but not much space to separate different ideas.
The individual articles seem better organized, but not organzied nearly as well as the Wiki site.
I like the site; some of the ideas are well summarized, and thought out. But there seems to be quite a lot of craziness; they seem to be taking Goethe's ideas at face value (his Science was only of poetic value), and chemical equations for relationships, which just seems like rhetorical math to me. (man + woman = baby, therefore man + woman - baby = 0)
ruveyn wrote:
Thermodynamic laws are the same for all heat engines including living organisms. The characteristic of a live thing is that it exists and can live only when it is far from equilibrium.
ruveyn
ruveyn
Of course. One of my favorite books is Schrodingers "What is Life?", in which he (somewhat trivally) defines negentropy, a measure of order, as klog 1/D (d = atomistic disorder). Thermodynamics applies to every energy transformation, and spontaneous reaction. But I didn't see a lot of scientific content on that site; just quotes from high IQ (as the site repeatedly says) scientists. The front page even claims the work/volume/pressure law describes (in SI units) the work done by a person standing in a crowd. Surely, it's BS? People aren't ideal gases.
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
