Why is science demonized in people's minds?
Why is science demonized in people's minds? Not just in their minds, but in both secular and religious institutions?
I mean, the body of science doesn't start wars, cause famine, or create natural disasters. Nor does it raise taxes, foreclose on homes, or addict children to crack cocaine. It is the politicians, business people, nature, and criminals that do these things.
So why is science given such a bum rap?
Its an easy target for some. Most people don't know very much about it. They figure "science" is a monolithic institution based on some craggy castle where there are always thunderstorms and mad scientists working to extend man's reach beyond his grasp. Or that they are poking into things "created by God" and best left not known...
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
I mean, the body of science doesn't start wars, cause famine, or create natural disasters. Nor does it raise taxes, foreclose on homes, or addict children to crack cocaine. It is the politicians, business people, nature, and criminals that do these things.
So why is science given such a bum rap?
I'm not sure most people do demonize science. Most don't understand it, and will admit as much.
Having said this, you are right that science is morally neutral, and this is as much a problem as a strength. Science can tell us if something may be done, and under what circumstances. But science cannot tell us whether something should be done.
It is also the case that science has definite limits (e.g., creatio ex nihilo), as does all human rationality, as evidenced by the paradox.
If you are interested in more on the negative effects of science, I would encourage you to research scientism.
On the whole, science is a wonderful thing, but it is not without its limits and problems.
Well, I will take a bit of issue with your assertion that science doesn't raise taxes. It doesn't raise them directly, but a lot of science is publicly funded and as such is paid for out of tax money. When people here about $10 billion being spent on the Large Hadron Collider, or space exploration, they do tend to think that it could be spent on better things. Or wonder why their tax dollars are paying for it. I believe Sarah Palin, during the last election, mocked the fact that the government was giving grants to research on worms (or maybe it was fruit flies, I can't remember).
Religious institutions don't like science because it can go against their gospel, so that's pretty obvious I think. In terms of secular institutions, I think they usually will go against science because they only ever seem to think of the bad things it's brought us (nuclear weapons, technology to invade people's privacy, the potential for biological warfare etc.). They forget that it was actually human beings who chose to use science this way. And they seem to turn a blind eye to the many good things that science has brought us (medicine, ability to communicate with people on the other side of the world, ability to provide food more cheaply and reliably than ever before, etc.)
Also, I think that, to a degree, people just don't trust science because they don't understand it. People don't like someone up in an ivory tower telling them that they have to do this, or that something is the case. Perhaps, at a subconscious level, they feel that if normal people can't understand it then it somehow is a violation of democracy.
I think it is only demonized by those brainwashed by religion into believing there is a god who created everything etc. This brainwashing often starts at birth in regions of the world where religion is endemic, particularly in areas such as Africa, Arabic countries and America. The religious meme is well established in kids by their parents and peers and by the time they are adults it is too late. Such people prefer to hang on to their beliefs rather than discover the truths that science has revealed. Besides it takes a considerable amount of time and effort to educate oneself on scientific matters; most people are too lazy to learn anyway.
I'll never forget when I was studying degree level sciences that the handful of Muslim students present never attended the biology classes that went into detail about the mechanisms and biochemistry involved in how evolution works. Apparently they were forbidden to learn the science because it contradicts the Koran.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
Mindslave
Veteran

Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,034
Location: Where the wild things wish they were
I'll never forget when I was studying degree level sciences that the handful of Muslim students present never attended the biology classes that went into detail about the mechanisms and biochemistry involved in how evolution works. Apparently they were forbidden to learn the science because it contradicts the Koran.

Two thoughts:
1. It is one thing to treat religion as religion. It is another matter altogether to treat science as religion.
2. Assuming you're French, one of the biggest laments of the postmodernists of your country is the explosive growth of fundamentalism in all its myriad forms--from market fundamentalism to religious fundamentalism. As with the rest of the left, the postmodernists allow no quarter for human nature, particularly the need for grand recits. Of course, the postmodernists are correct on metanarratives such as Marxism and Fascism. In comparison, religion is a very innocuous grand recit. As another Frenchman said, "If God did not exist, he would have to be invented." It's simply human nature.
Wouldn't it be--well--ironic if science became just another grand recit?
Last edited by Dunnyveg on 12 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm, edited 3 times in total.
lol..Yay someone said it. My daughter and I were having a good laugh last week because in many of the cartoon/anime superhero shows she likes to watch, there is a "mad physicist." We were laughing at the idea of the mad physicist, because to us, science/reason/facts...things that you can count on...seem to be the opposite of "mad." But the prevailing opinion and the one that is cartoonized most often, is the "mad scientist," always trying to take over the world. It struck a funny chord with us last week.
Bethanie
Good question.
Historically, on the level of instituionalized religion it was probably a matter of political power being threatened by creating a challenge to the mystical claims which justified holding that power. Sort of like saying, "the Pharoh/Pope is wrong!" -- Galileo may have only meant it in a factual sense, but that didn't matter to the powers-that-be. (Silly, idealistic scientists...)
One thing I've never been able to grasp is the idea that if you learn about, say, photosynthesis, that it destroys the beauty of a flower (or whatever). IOW, that learning something scientific somehow destroys appreciation.
I mean, WTF? That makes plants ten times more amazing to me. They have thousands (?) of chemical reactions going on inside them, they grow, follow the sun, have DNA (like me -- IIRC humans and bananas have 50% the same DNA -- how amazing is that?). Knowing that stuff does not diminish my aesthetic appreiciation at all -- it supplements it with an additional kind of appreciation.
And why doesn't knowing that bees pollinate plants destroy the appreciation of bees for most people, then?
In the case of war, I suppose it's seeing the effects without reflecting on the causes. People saw the effects of mustard gas and blame and horror went to science instead of war itself? ...Hmm, I'm not sure I buy my own argument, there. Science has increased the capability of mass killing and mass maiming dramatically. Once could argue that if people wouldn't have wars then there wouldn't be a problem, but humanity will always have wars. On the upside, we're all not dead from nuclear annihilation, so I guess humanity is showing some degree of ability to handle the power that science gives it (so far, anyway).
That's it?
All you've done is point at the question and praise it without providing an actual answer.
You may have a future in politics.
That's it?
All you've done is point at the question and praise it without providing an actual answer.
You may have a future in politics.

_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
Titangeek
Veteran

Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,696
Location: somewhere in the vicinity of betelgeuse
is this a 'why do christians hate science topic' because i am not of that group.
i'm a christian and i like science but it all depends on what branch as well. i favor some branches more then others.
i like branch that has to do with robots and anything like robots. bomb construction, [the ones used in wars].
this might have something to with my love of machines.
i think it's not science itself, or what it's doing, the economy is in a downward spiral in the usa. people are more then eager to point and blame the first thing they see. but i have to agree somewhat the focus in the usa at least should be on lowering the debt and nothing else. anything that can help should be tried.
i feel bad for my dad and my bro, both diesel truck owners. and you have to fork out a ton of money to fill those.
4$ and up where i live.
_________________
"It's the song of destruction a requiem of the end" jr in xenosaga III

Only when those beliefs have no factual basis in reality.
Maybe that's it ... maybe people don't like science because it's too easy to have one's fallacious beliefs exposed as delusional by someone with a scientific background. Maybe also it is easier to believe a thousand lies than one indisputable fact.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
In the name of Science, guess what this is? |
30 May 2025, 7:18 pm |
Science Videos |
13 Jul 2025, 8:07 pm |
How old do people think I am? |
07 Jul 2025, 1:27 am |
Talking to People |
30 Apr 2025, 6:15 pm |