over9000 wrote:
I found noscript to be a little bit intimidating to use, although thanks for telling me that the script specifically shows adfly among them.
It's very easy to use and rarely needs touching. The only times I tweak it is for a new site I've not used before but would really
like to use, and then it's a case of selectively allowing certain things to run. It doesn't take long to discover those things which are useless - to me, anyway - Facebook, Twitter, and the more obvious ad-related sites etc so knowing which things to allow to make the site functional is quite easy - and they're just as easily turned off too.
Quote:
Second of all, I know that it's malware because of the fact that nobody else has the same problem.
No, adf.ly isn't malware. Really, it's not...
If you check the adf.ly site I linked a few posts back you'll see that it works through scripts and if those scripts are allowed to run, most likely the default situation for many browsers, then it will be intrusive and annoying irrespective of the OS and the browser.
I Googled
stopping adf.ly which turned up quite a bit that may be of interest to you, and all of it involved preventing or bypassing the sneaky tricks the adf.ly scripts try to pull with your browser. There is no malicious code installed because (quite apart from it being commercial suicide) there is no reason to do so.
Quote:
I've also looked up malware on linux, and found out that even though it's not as effective, it does indeed work on wine, and I have wine on my system.
Just because something which emulates Windows exists on your system does not make the system prone to malware - not least because if Wine was prone to anything, it would be prone to
Windows malware. Assuming that Wine was prone, then it would only affect the operation of Wine and Windows software you might be running under Wine and even
then, only while you were running it. If you were to run Malwarebytes under Wine you would be providing protection from Windows malware for that Windows environment only - not Linux, under which it will not only fail to run because it is Windows software, but it would be pointless to run it anyway.
Linux is totally and utterly different in its operation and it is
impossible for Windows malware to affect it, because the Windows-related vulnerabilities (caused by specific flaws in specific parts of Windows OS code) simply
do not exist in Linux. I don't just mean that it is basically "more secure" than Windows; more that the code which malware expects to use as an easy infection route is not present
at all - quite apart from the many,
many other differences in the way the OS works.
It's like saying that an insult spoken in French will also be offensive to someone understanding German only. It's never going to happen.
I suggest you Google for
wine malware for a wider description.
ETA: plus everything drh1138 said, who posted while I was writing this.
_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.