Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

Ashton
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

14 Aug 2008, 7:26 am

Ok, so I don't know a hell of alot about Linux. I can do some basic stuff from the command line, and can use the various Window Managers no problem at all. I've messed with Ubuntu a little, and I don't mind it, it's pretty good. I've heard it isn't really a good representation of a Linux distro because it's so "dumbed-down".

Basically, I want to learn more about Linux. I'll be dual-booting my main box (which runs Windows) with a Linux distro, but I was wondering which distro would be good for me if I want to learn about Linux and "get my hands dirty"?



Paddy789
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 222

14 Aug 2008, 7:30 am

I liked Suse, but I'm not too into Linux since I use Ubuntu aswell.



Ashton
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

14 Aug 2008, 7:33 am

Paddy789 wrote:
I liked Suse, but I'm not too into Linux since I use Ubuntu aswell.


Yeah, I tried openSUSE and just didn't like it. Ditto Fedora.



LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

14 Aug 2008, 8:59 am

Maybe Gentoo? I know that it's not user friendly, but if you want to learn about the system, it's not bad!


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

14 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm

Distrowatch is always good for info on Linux distros.

How deep into the system do you want to go?

Slackware and Debian are good if you want something widely used with lots of software, but not dumbed down. Both of them (especially Debian) are very widely used as a base for new distros.

Arch is good if you want to be deeply involved in the details of setting up your system. Last time I tried it, the "automated installer" told me that it had loaded an installation guide on another virtual terminal, and suggested that I use that and the command line to do the rest of the installation because "all the cool kids do". 8O :D

If you're willing to write your own config files by hand, arch is great. You don't even have to know how ahead of time, there's pretty good documentation. Also, it has a really knowledgeable and friendly user community.


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton


gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

14 Aug 2008, 1:02 pm

Try Red Hat



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

14 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm

Arch, Debian, and Slackware have reputations of being a bit more in-depth than Ubuntu. Debian is similar to Ubuntu in terms of package management and such, and since you said you didn't like Suse or Fedora, you might want to avoid the Red-Hat style distros in favor of the Debian types.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Kiski
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 57
Location: Galifrey

15 Aug 2008, 12:36 pm

I prefer Fedora, but since that's been ruled out, Ubuntu is very good as well.


_________________
Human knowledge belongs to the world, like Shakespeare or Aspirin.


Johnny_Monolith
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 17

15 Aug 2008, 12:56 pm

Ubuntu is a very good first distro to use, it's easy to setup and unless you have some kind of wacky or obscure hardware everything should install smoothly. Gentoo as well. In fact, the install when I tried Gentoo was smoother than the install for Windows XP on the same system!

Personally I prefer Red Hat (Fedora Core) because it has such a large user base and is one of the most thoroughly documented distros.



Ashton
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

15 Aug 2008, 7:32 pm

Johnny_Monolith wrote:
Ubuntu is a very good first distro to use, it's easy to setup and unless you have some kind of wacky or obscure hardware everything should install smoothly. Gentoo as well. In fact, the install when I tried Gentoo was smoother than the install for Windows XP on the same system!

Personally I prefer Red Hat (Fedora Core) because it has such a large user base and is one of the most thoroughly documented distros.


But just how dirty can I get with Ubuntu? Like, I want recompile kernals and all that sort of stuff, learn the ropes of the command line all that sort of stuff. So, should I just install Ubuntu then?



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

15 Aug 2008, 8:18 pm

Ashton wrote:
Johnny_Monolith wrote:
Ubuntu is a very good first distro to use, it's easy to setup and unless you have some kind of wacky or obscure hardware everything should install smoothly. Gentoo as well. In fact, the install when I tried Gentoo was smoother than the install for Windows XP on the same system!

Personally I prefer Red Hat (Fedora Core) because it has such a large user base and is one of the most thoroughly documented distros.


But just how dirty can I get with Ubuntu? Like, I want recompile kernals and all that sort of stuff, learn the ropes of the command line all that sort of stuff. So, should I just install Ubuntu then?


You can do that stuff in ubuntu.

I would install ubuntu twice. one for a control/production machine and the other to do experiments on.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


Ashton
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jun 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 76

16 Aug 2008, 2:12 am

Fuzzy wrote:
Ashton wrote:
Johnny_Monolith wrote:
Ubuntu is a very good first distro to use, it's easy to setup and unless you have some kind of wacky or obscure hardware everything should install smoothly. Gentoo as well. In fact, the install when I tried Gentoo was smoother than the install for Windows XP on the same system!

Personally I prefer Red Hat (Fedora Core) because it has such a large user base and is one of the most thoroughly documented distros.


But just how dirty can I get with Ubuntu? Like, I want recompile kernals and all that sort of stuff, learn the ropes of the command line all that sort of stuff. So, should I just install Ubuntu then?


You can do that stuff in ubuntu.

I would install ubuntu twice. one for a control/production machine and the other to do experiments on.


Hmm....alright, Ubuntu it is then. I have Virtualbox too, so I guess if I want to do something risky or possibly destructive I can do it in there. Thanks guys.

*loads up GParted*