Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

08 Sep 2008, 7:45 pm

Well, I gotting pretty tired of using old, unreliable versions of windows on old dell laptop[ Mistake Edition] and decided to take the XUbuntu route. I'm a crazy for wanting to install Xubuntu on this.

Dell Latitude CPI
300Mhz PII
128MB EDO Memory
6.4GB Hard Drive
24X CD-Rom Drive

Well I figured if XP can run slow but ok on the laptop I'd give Xubuntu a try. Why, Well it is the most compatible version of Linux and probaly the only one with drivers for sound and WiFi. Also linux is for the most part all the same kernel and could be tweaked to perform well on old systems.



n4mwd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 871
Location: Palm Beach, FL

08 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm

I'm getting ready to install eeebuntu on an ASUS eee PC. The xandros linux is too limited.



Keith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,321
Location: East Sussex, UK

08 Sep 2008, 7:55 pm

I would recommend Windows 98se A if you want a Windows version. XP needs 64MB RAM minimum, the laptop exceeds that twice whereas you need about 256MB realistically



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

08 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm

Do an ubuntu-minimal install and install the xfce desktop environment instead. It's lighter than the standard xubuntu install. Or, you could do ubuntu-minimal+icewm or fluxbox. If you really want to go hard-core on this, Arch comes highly recommended and is extremely efficient in using system resources.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

08 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm

Orwell wrote:
Do an ubuntu-minimal install and install the xfce desktop environment instead. It's lighter than the standard xubuntu install. Or, you could do ubuntu-minimal+icewm or fluxbox. If you really want to go hard-core on this, Arch comes highly recommended and is extremely efficient in using system resources.



Orwell you are the king!! ! I honestly don't like to use old versions of windows due to unstability issues. Though I can't efficently use a newer NT-Based Windows due to resorce issues on this old laptop.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

08 Sep 2008, 8:18 pm

^I still have not tried Arch, so I can't vouch for it personally in terms of difficulty in getting it to cooperate, but I've been told it is lightning fast. As far as the other ones, I haven't messed with them all that much because I have a fairly modern comp that runs quite well in even the regular "bloated" Ubuntu with GNOME, but I know it is possible to get it much leaner than I have it without too much hassle.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


LostInEmulation
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,047
Location: Ireland, dreaming of Germany

09 Sep 2008, 1:30 am

I'd maybe prefer damn small liinux to Xubuntu. On a similar computer, a Xubuntu was really slow!


_________________
I am not a native speaker. Please contact me if I made grammatical mistakes in the posting above.

Penguins cannot fly because what cannot fly cannot crash!


Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

09 Sep 2008, 3:26 am

Game freak, here is a site that deals with installing xubuntu, and, if needed, a minimal 'buntu.

http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/xubuntu


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


n4mwd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 871
Location: Palm Beach, FL

09 Sep 2008, 4:51 am

Keith wrote:
I would recommend Windows 98se A if you want a Windows version. XP needs 64MB RAM minimum, the laptop exceeds that twice whereas you need about 256MB realistically


For the DELL above, 98se is a good choice. I have a universal USB driver for it which fixes its biggest limitation. I should also point out that 98se is about twice as fast as XP running on the same hardware. Its stability issues are not easily noticeable on machines that are not used for servers. I have several machines here running 98se and I'm always amazed at how a 300 Mhz Pentium with 98se can out run a 2 GHz Athlon running vista.



Keith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,321
Location: East Sussex, UK

09 Sep 2008, 6:31 am

Windows 98 IS restricted to a 64GB hard drive limitation, I'm not sure if that is something Microsoft deliberately implemented or not. I've had no problems with Windows 98se, but I have had problems with Windows 98



gamefreak
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,119
Location: Citrus County, Florida

09 Sep 2008, 9:37 pm

Just in Hardy Heron freezes before the thing loads up. Trying Gusty Gibbon right now and get I/O Errors. Any reasons why.



Keith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,321
Location: East Sussex, UK

10 Sep 2008, 12:59 am

No idea what you are talking about - sorry :(



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

10 Sep 2008, 2:23 am

On the liveCD? I had that problem too, but part way through the install, specifically during the formating of the hard drive. I managed to do the job with the alternate install disk. Turns out that I had a lot of dust bunnies in the machine. In the end I took care of the partitioning and formating by hand, then went back and did the install.

At what point are you locking up?

You can also try the beta for 8.10(intrepid Ibex). its been reworked to run better on small machines.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


n4mwd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 871
Location: Palm Beach, FL

10 Sep 2008, 5:17 am

Keith wrote:
No idea what you are talking about - sorry :(


Every time someone recompiles linux, they give it a nickname.

You can get around the FAT32 limitations on windows by using an external program to format it. Windows itself won't format it that big, but it will support it once the format is complete. The problem is that you are going to have huge cluster sizes if you do that. Its best to split the drive into multiple drives 64 GB and less. The exception is when you know your files will all be really big - such as a database or a drive full of big videos.