Why does 'nature' encourage living organisms to breed?

Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

patrick6
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Age: 186
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,257
Location: London, U.K.

20 Sep 2008, 11:30 am

Why does 'nature' encourage living organisms to breed? (Why would nature care if we breed or not? Sex is obviously pleasurable in order to encourage living organisms to breed, that isn't difficult to figure out, but I wonder why it (nature itself) would want organisms to breed.)



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

20 Sep 2008, 12:09 pm

Species wouldn't last long if they didn't breed. Don't overthink is, OK?



Drakilor
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Age: 177
Gender: Female
Posts: 186

20 Sep 2008, 1:09 pm

Thread over. Don't post below this line.

-------------------------------------------------------------------


_________________
"Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; And therefore is winged Cupid painted blind."


lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,619
Location: Somerset UK

20 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm

patrick6 wrote:
Why does 'nature' encourage living organisms to breed? (Why would nature care if we breed or not? Sex is obviously pleasurable in order to encourage living organisms to breed, that isn't difficult to figure out, but I wonder why it (nature itself) would want organisms to breed.)

Not really a meaningful question. "Nature" linked to "encourage" and "want" - it does neither.

There are some fundamental ways physics works that, as a side effect, have resulted in sufficient complexity to exhibit what we call "life". One mechanism that gets used on this planet is "breeding".


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


donkey
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,468
Location: ireland

20 Sep 2008, 3:02 pm

its a feature of darwinian theory.
we are because we breed.

or think of it this way.
if we didnt breed we wouldnt exist.


_________________
a great civilisation cannot be conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within- W. Durant


carturo222
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,568
Location: Colombia

21 Sep 2008, 11:51 am

Don't assume nature has a "purpose" or an "intention". Thinks just happen because the conditions let them happen. As soon as a self-replicating molecule appeared on the primitive seas, its composition led it to naturally self-replicate. The process isn't perfect, though. Those variations who do it well thrive and keep on, and those who do it the wrong way disappear. Fast forward a couple hundred million years, and the rules are the same. Organisms who develop skills and behaviors that led to more breeding will obviously make those traits more popular among the community, and organisms whose actions lead to less breeding will tend to disappear. So, evolution is not an intentional process, but a residual one. What we have now is what little remains of an unimaginable succession of failures. This is not what was "supposed" or "meant" to be, but what merely happened to succeed.



carturo222
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,568
Location: Colombia

21 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm

Nature doesn't "encourage" you to breed. Nature has no will, no intelligence, no intentions. Nature simply follows what works best. If you happen to have an urge to breed, you'll naturally breed more, and in the next generation more individuals will have the same urge. It's just a successful change that happens to work. It's not what nature "wants", because nature does not want anything. It's just what gave better results.



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

21 Sep 2008, 1:59 pm

"Nature" is only the human personification of the environment. Whats ever more ridiculous is people divide nature from the environment in towns, in buildings. There is not threshold there.


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.