gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
Yesterday I read a book about whole-body transplants (brain transplants), and I think the concept is really interesting, so I thought I'd start a thread about it.
Could it be scientifically viable in the near future?
You'd have to remove the brain from the body it's in, keep it alive while hooking it up to the circulatory system of the new body, then connect all the nerves. Look only at the spinal cord. Reconnecting the spinal cord is what you need to do to fix paraplegia. At present, treatments are experimental, and the best I've seen published is that something partly works in rats. Now remember that the brain sends out a lot of information to tell the body how to keep going. You can't just take your own sweet time to connect up, unless you have a way to keep the body alive until the brain can take over.
Whether this could be viable in the near future depends on whether you assume linear or exponential growth of capabilities. If linear, count on centuries. If exponential, with a fast enough growth rate, I would expect within 50 to 100 years. That's what's known as a WAG (wild-assed guess).
gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
Would it even be ethical to use such technology if it became available?
One major question would be where you get the body from. If you cloned yourself, how could the body grow up without a brain to steer it? If you let the body develop with a brain, you'll have to kill someone to get a new body. To avoid that, you could try to build a body of the desired age from scratch, instead of letting it grow. If it will become possible to make replacement organs from stem cells and biodegradable scaffolds, then that might be possible. But then the brain transplant would be unnecessary, because you could just replace the body one part at a time, instead of doing it all at once.