SO MUCH BATMAN

Post Reply New Topic

exactly

I don't love batman, he is a loser who plays hero but fails miserably.

[quote="Werecrocodile"]I don't love batman, he is a loser who plays hero but fails miserably.[/quote

That's nice, to each their own.

The problem is I think is you think Nolans films are the be all and end all of batman ilms fwhich is not true.

jamesy, please type clearly. i can't understand what this sentence says

Jamesy, for the millionth time, you are repeating yourself. The same could be said for you, you think the Schumacher films are the be all end all. Stop changing the fecking subject to to suit your own needs.

sorry i have been having one too many beers tonight . What I meant to say is that why do you guys think Nolans films are the be all and end all of batman?

For fecks sake, WE DON'T think that Nolan's films are the be all and end all. I PREFER them over Joel Schumacher's abortions anyday of the week because they don't portray Batman as some celebrity who spends his night wooing a slu*ty psychologist and beating up a bunch of wimpy Two Face goons in front of cheering onlookers.

Batman Forever was a good film. Batman and Robin was not great but it was not the worst film ever.

Batman 89 though I must say was better than TDK and Begins. I remember once critic said he was unimpressed with Batman Begins

Nolans films maybe faithful to the comics but there still boring.

I think you'll find that Batman and Robin IS one of the worst films ever concieved, and everyone is a critic anyway. Batman 89 feels empty and dated in this day and age, though i grew up watching it.

But TDK is not the best bat film ever made.

In YOUR mind, that is. The box office takings speak for themselves.

jamesy, here's what i think of the batman series

batman 89 is empty and dated, as lexington said. also, it is not very faithful to the comics, and it is boring at times. keaton is a horrible bruce wayne. he is supposed to be a devilishly attractive billionaire, but he is extremely socially awkward and annoying. his batman isn't that good either. he isn't that physically fit, he gets his ass kicked by the african american goon near the end. also, he breaks his #1 rule by killing 3 times. 1. ace chemical factory massacre. 2. african american goon. 3. the joker jack nicholson as the joker is ok. he really isn't that funny or scary, just silly and creepy. plus his sudden interest in vicki vale is stupid. vicki vale herself isn't great. she is just a typical love interest/damsel-in-distress. also, her screams are annoying. michael gouth as alfred was actually pretty good, but nowhere near as good as michael caine. billy dee williams as harvey dent had very little screen time. also the commisioner gordon was the worst part of this movie. C+

batman returns is mediocre. it is weird, disturbing, and even more boring than its predecessor. tim burton has a need to make every batman villain a psychopath. catwoman was weird, and annoying. the penguin was also weird. with the villains, they felt like gimmicks. catwoman was literally acting like a cat, penguin was acting like a penguin. it just felt stupid. also lines like "eat floor, high fiber" were annoying. christopher walken was ok. it had batman as a serial killer. C-

batman forever is bad, but not as much as returns. val kilmer is wooden beyond belief. chris o'donnell is whiney and annoying. nicole kidman is a slut. tommy lee jones and jim carrey are just stupid. the dialouge is horrendous. it is goofy, silly, and campy. but at times, it is entertaining. C

batman & robin is s**t. F

batman begins is great. we finally have batman as a badass, and wayne who is a spoiled brat. christian bale is pretty damn good. michael caine was an excellent alfred. we finally have him as a fathr figure to wayne. morgan freeman was also great. gary oldman literally WAS commisioner gordon. liam neeson was great as ra's al ghul. i wish that they gotten someone french to play ducard. cillian murphy was also good as scarecrow. the only really bad thing was katie holmes. it is entertaining, dark, and has great acting. B+

the dark knight is even better. with phenominal acting from ledger, suspenceful scenes, great action, and a ton of plot twists, it pleases more people than batman forever. A-

Last edited by imbatshitcrazy on 26 Sep 2010, 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Take away heath ledger from tdk and what do you get?

If someone else was the Joker, then it would of been just like Begins. Still, Ledger stole every scene he appeared in. The disappearing pencil trick was his best scene, nearly everyone in the audience laughed their heads off.

Well at the end of the day its heath ledgers show kind of like how robin williams stole the show in Alladin. without him the movie would be nothing special.