What films are overrated, in your opinion?

Page 2 of 5 [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Descartes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Apr 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,288
Location: Texas, unfortunately

11 Nov 2011, 8:39 pm

Slumdog Millionaire and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Both movies were sort of dull for me.


_________________
What fresh hell is this?


Caribou
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 63

11 Nov 2011, 11:39 pm

I agree with the Hangover.. although I do like that one guy..that I don't know the name of. I would also say Shutter Island, but I only watched 5 minutes of it before shutting it off, so it may not be fair to say. Napoleon Dynamite was my least favorite over-hyped movie.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

11 Nov 2011, 11:54 pm

Godfather - all of them
Rocky - all of them
Memento



TheRiff
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 15

12 Nov 2011, 2:11 am

The Big Lebowski

I thought it was a pretty good movie, but I was told to expect one of the best films ever. I was also told it was a very quotable movie, full of witty lines, and I just don't see it.



Wolfheart
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,971
Location: Kent, England

12 Nov 2011, 9:31 am

LexingtonDeville wrote:
You also can't compare Jack Nicholson and Heath Ledger, two completely different incarnations of the Joker with different agendas. Too bad Jack looks like a mobster in clown make-up and Heath gets under the mask and the skin in the most unpredictable and erratic manner.


I think it's difficult to compare the two, Nolan intended Batman begins and The Dark knight to have a sense of realism and immensity whereas the 1989 version was made with the intention of clearly being comical, humorous and lighthearted. In terms of production values, character development, directing and acting, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are better but I felt the Dark Knight failed to capture the spirit and atmosphere of Gotham.

There's certain aspects I love about both of them and they both individually deserve merit, Tim Burton certainly always brings the fun factor to the table and Nolan's portrayal is certainly more thought provoking and immense. I think the biggest question now is whether Anne Hathaway can top Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman, we all know how disastrous the spinoff with Halle Berry was.



LexingtonDeville
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,364
Location: Blackburn

12 Nov 2011, 11:06 am

Wolfheart wrote:
LexingtonDeville wrote:
You also can't compare Jack Nicholson and Heath Ledger, two completely different incarnations of the Joker with different agendas. Too bad Jack looks like a mobster in clown make-up and Heath gets under the mask and the skin in the most unpredictable and erratic manner.


I think it's difficult to compare the two, Nolan intended Batman begins and The Dark knight to have a sense of realism and immensity whereas the 1989 version was made with the intention of clearly being comical, humorous and lighthearted. In terms of production values, character development, directing and acting, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are better but I felt the Dark Knight failed to capture the spirit and atmosphere of Gotham.

There's certain aspects I love about both of them and they both individually deserve merit, Tim Burton certainly always brings the fun factor to the table and Nolan's portrayal is certainly more thought provoking and immense. I think the biggest question now is whether Anne Hathaway can top Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman, we all know how disastrous the spinoff with Halle Berry was.


Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman is still the best incarnation, it will take some beating. I always felt that Burton's Bat-movies captured the dark, brooding and gothic fantasy of Gotham, whereas Nolan's realism makes Gotham more of an urban jungle.


_________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe: Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion; I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time; like tears in rain. Time to die." Roy Batty


BigBadBrad
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 134
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

12 Nov 2011, 11:17 am

TheRiff wrote:
The Big Lebowski

I thought it was a pretty good movie, but I was told to expect one of the best films ever. I was also told it was a very quotable movie, full of witty lines, and I just don't see it.


the Dude does NOT abide. :cry: My first DVD wore out.



GreySun369
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 824

14 Nov 2011, 9:28 am

The remake of Dawn of the Dead. To be honest I didn't care too much for the original by George A. Romero, but I couldn't figure out why so many people liked the remake. The movie had practically no character development, and some of the main characters were downright a**holes like the cop played by Ving Rhames. I didn't like the fast zombies as much as the slow zombies in Romero's other films, and it's kind of lame that now every new zombie movie and video game has to show these fast zombies. Also one thing I didn't understand about the remake was the point of the characters trying to escape the shopping mall. I mean the world has ended and zombies are everywhere and they're pretty secure in this building with lots of food and supplies to last them a long time. Then for seemingly no reason they decide to escape their safe shelter and head for some islands, which in the very end of the movie proves to be a stupid decision because the islands are filled with zombies and they get killed. I just couldn't grasp the logic of that, I guess it was just to keep the plot of the film going. In the original Dawn of the Dead the characters were given a more realistic excuse for escaping because the zombies eventually broke into the mall and they had no choice but to leave. :?



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Nov 2011, 12:07 pm

Henbane wrote:
Blade Runner. I know. It's a classic. It bores me though.


I agree, it's got great ideas and music and bits and moments but overall it's too ponderous and dull and unaffecting. *cue lynching* :lol:

Quote:
Dune. Another one I should have loved.


I don't think anyone really considers Dune to be a classic. It's mainly thought of as more of a horribly flawed interest piece.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm

shrox wrote:
Godfather - all of them


G2 is a borefest. G3 is just a freaking mess.

Quote:
Memento


U mad?


_________________
Not currently a moderator


Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm

GreySun369 wrote:
The remake of Dawn of the Dead.


Very much a 3 stars out of 5 movie... just


_________________
Not currently a moderator


GreySun369
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 824

14 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm

Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
The remake of Dawn of the Dead.


Very much a 3 stars out of 5 movie... just


That's 2 stars more than what I would have rated it if it were up to me. :roll:



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm

GreySun369 wrote:
Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
The remake of Dawn of the Dead.


Very much a 3 stars out of 5 movie... just


That's 2 stars more than what I would have rated it if it were up to me. :roll:


It'd have to be a very poor film indeed to recieve a one. I thought it was watchable, just not very edifying, and making no lasting impression.


_________________
Not currently a moderator


GreySun369
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 824

14 Nov 2011, 2:18 pm

Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
The remake of Dawn of the Dead.


Very much a 3 stars out of 5 movie... just


That's 2 stars more than what I would have rated it if it were up to me. :roll:


It'd have to be a very poor film indeed to recieve a one. I thought it was watchable, just not very edifying, and making no lasting impression.


Well I judge films on how they should appeal to my tastes, not how the should appeal to the rest of the world. I could care less about the quality or budget that goes into a film just as long as I find it enjoyable.

But I guess I'm a little biased because I generally don't like remakes, and I feel that any remake of a film automatically lowers its value. The only exception is the 1990 remake of Night of the Living Dead which I felt was better than the original but it also had the same crew working on it so the intention of the film was to improve the original rather than cash in on it.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

14 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm

Moog wrote:
shrox wrote:
Godfather - all of them


G2 is a borefest. G3 is just a freaking mess.

Quote:
Memento


U mad?


I could have though of a much better why to remind myself of things than random tattoos scatter all over. How about a nice, concise paragraph tattooed backwards on your chest so you can read it in the mirror?



Moog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,671
Location: Untied Kingdom

14 Nov 2011, 2:24 pm

GreySun369 wrote:
Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
Moog wrote:
GreySun369 wrote:
The remake of Dawn of the Dead.


Very much a 3 stars out of 5 movie... just


That's 2 stars more than what I would have rated it if it were up to me. :roll:


It'd have to be a very poor film indeed to recieve a one. I thought it was watchable, just not very edifying, and making no lasting impression.


Well I judge films on how they should appeal to my tastes, not how the should appeal to the rest of the world. I could care less about the quality or budget that goes into a film just as long as I find it enjoyable.

But I guess I'm a little biased because I generally don't like remakes, and I feel that any remake of a film automatically lowers its value. The only exception is the 1990 remake of Night of the Living Dead which I felt was better than the original but it also had the same crew working on it so the intention of the film was to improve the original rather than cash in on it.


Huh, I'd never heard there was a remake of that.


_________________
Not currently a moderator