Page 2 of 4 [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

12 Jan 2012, 11:23 am

Alright, check this out:

Quote:
You need to turn the tables to get him to chase. Like all men , socios get bored when there is no chase or excitement. The most important thing you can do is keep him guessing.

What worked with mine when he started acting this way was to decide that I could and would walk away. I never verbalized this to him, but he sensed it. They are extremely good at that.

[...]

Look like you are trying to keep from being caught at something and don't let him "catch" you. And I'm telling you the more you hide what you are doing the more he'll care, especially if you start being unavailable for plans.

You have given him a chase, a challenge, competition and a mystery. It kills the boredom and makes him second guess the slot he's placed you in. Worked for me.


From here. Sounds just like Sherlock and Irene to me :wink:

Arguing this is stupid anyway, we all know that Sherlock is a sociopath because he f**king well said so in the very first episode. It's completely canon in the show. It's not even debatable.

How about you tell me exactly why he isn't one if you still want to continue this line of enquiry? As I said, though, since it was specifically stated in the show that he is a high-functioning sociopath, you're gonna have a hard time arguing this.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

12 Jan 2012, 12:36 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
Alright, check this out:

Quote:
You need to turn the tables to get him to chase. Like all men , socios get bored when there is no chase or excitement. The most important thing you can do is keep him guessing.

What worked with mine when he started acting this way was to decide that I could and would walk away. I never verbalized this to him, but he sensed it. They are extremely good at that.

[...]

Look like you are trying to keep from being caught at something and don't let him "catch" you. And I'm telling you the more you hide what you are doing the more he'll care, especially if you start being unavailable for plans.

You have given him a chase, a challenge, competition and a mystery. It kills the boredom and makes him second guess the slot he's placed you in. Worked for me.


From here. Sounds just like Sherlock and Irene to me :wink:

Arguing this is stupid anyway, we all know that Sherlock is a sociopath because he f**king well said so in the very first episode. It's completely canon in the show. It's not even debatable.

How about you tell me exactly why he isn't one if you still want to continue this line of enquiry? As I said, though, since it was specifically stated in the show that he is a high-functioning sociopath, you're gonna have a hard time arguing this.


It is debatable because there is always the possibility he got it wrong. He presented his own idea and everybody else presented theirs (Watson and that police guy).

I agree it does sound like it with Adler, however you also have to recognise that he is always prepared to chase down a mystery. For most of the episode that's exactly what he was doing. Investigating and s**t. During the last bit he apparently tracked her down to the middle east or whatever. He put himself in harms way and that's not something a sociopath is known for. I think in this case the possible autism wins out as the explanation.

Again, your link isn't particularly credible. I don't want to say the information is wrong but there's nothing there to back it up.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

12 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
It is debatable because there is always the possibility he got it wrong. He presented his own idea and everybody else presented theirs (Watson and that police guy).


I'd say that someone as analytical as him is more likely to be correct, no?

Quote:
I agree it does sound like it with Adler, however you also have to recognise that he is always prepared to chase down a mystery. For most of the episode that's exactly what he was doing. Investigating and sh**.


Well of course, he's Sherlock Holmes.

Quote:
During the last bit he apparently tracked her down to the middle east or whatever. He put himself in harms way and that's not something a sociopath is known for. I think in this case the possible autism wins out as the explanation.


Because of the kind of thing described in the post I quoted. And he wouldn't have believed himself to be in any danger because he believes he's above that - in fact, in general he goes on about how everyone else is stupid and how he's smart, which to his credit is true, but Aspies don't tend to boast. A sociopath, on the other hand, often has an inflated sense of self-worth.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

12 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
It is debatable because there is always the possibility he got it wrong. He presented his own idea and everybody else presented theirs (Watson and that police guy).


1. I'd say that someone as analytical as him is more likely to be correct, no?

Quote:
I agree it does sound like it with Adler, however you also have to recognise that he is always prepared to chase down a mystery. For most of the episode that's exactly what he was doing. Investigating and sh**.


2. Well of course, he's Sherlock Holmes.

Quote:
During the last bit he apparently tracked her down to the middle east or whatever. He put himself in harms way and that's not something a sociopath is known for. I think in this case the possible autism wins out as the explanation.


3. Because of the kind of thing described in the post I quoted. And he wouldn't have believed himself to be in any danger because he believes he's above that - in fact, in general he goes on about how everyone else is stupid and how he's smart, which to his credit is true, but Aspies don't tend to boast. A sociopath, on the other hand, often has an inflated sense of self-worth.


1. Not necessarily. He's been wrong about aspects of cases multiple times now. It can also be harder to 'know yourself'. When he made the statement that he was a sociopath in the show it was designed to give the audience the impression that he genuinely doesn't care about anyone but himself. By the end of the first series we realise that this isn't quite true. To me this was supposed to be a revelation that's he's not actually a total psychopath. I think when you compare him to Moriarty you see the difference between them. Moriarty is 100% a sociopath. I just don't feel Sherlock really fits it.

2. Yeah :)

3. What I meant was that it seemed like the final search for Adler was outside of his obsession for his cases and done more out of sympathy or compassion or something. I've changed my mind about this though, as it could more simply be an attempt to challenge Moriarty. I guess your point may apply all the same. The writers basically have to go out of their way to put someone like Sherlock in danger.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

12 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Not necessarily. He's been wrong about aspects of cases multiple times now. It can also be harder to 'know yourself'. When he made the statement that he was a sociopath in the show it was designed to give the audience the impression that he genuinely doesn't care about anyone but himself. By the end of the first series we realise that this isn't quite true. To me this was supposed to be a revelation that's he's not actually a total psychopath. I think when you compare him to Moriarty you see the difference between them. Moriarty is 100% a sociopath. I just don't feel Sherlock really fits it.


True, but I'd imagine he's been thinking about the matter for a long time, and he does always seem to get the right answer at the end.

How do we see this at the end of the first series? You've still not explained that to me. I know that he's more emotional in the second series - most likely because any fiction needs to resonate with its audience on an emotional level - but even then, it's only for those very close to him, and even then, he has no trouble using those people for his own means - take what I brought up before about Sherlock believing he'd drugged Watson's coffee before locking him in a lab as an example.

Moriarty is a sociopath, yes, for sure. But that doesn't mean Sherlock isn't, at least in this particular adaptation anyway.

Quote:
What I meant was that it seemed like the final search for Adler was outside of his obsession for his cases and done more out of sympathy or compassion or something. I've changed my mind about this though, as it could more simply be an attempt to challenge Moriarty. I guess your point may apply all the same. The writers basically have to go out of their way to put someone like Sherlock in danger.


Indeed, good point.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

12 Jan 2012, 5:15 pm

Asp-Z wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Not necessarily. He's been wrong about aspects of cases multiple times now. It can also be harder to 'know yourself'. When he made the statement that he was a sociopath in the show it was designed to give the audience the impression that he genuinely doesn't care about anyone but himself. By the end of the first series we realise that this isn't quite true. To me this was supposed to be a revelation that's he's not actually a total psychopath. I think when you compare him to Moriarty you see the difference between them. Moriarty is 100% a sociopath. I just don't feel Sherlock really fits it.


True, but I'd imagine he's been thinking about the matter for a long time, and he does always seem to get the right answer at the end.

How do we see this at the end of the first series? You've still not explained that to me. I know that he's more emotional in the second series - most likely because any fiction needs to resonate with its audience on an emotional level - but even then, it's only for those very close to him, and even then, he has no trouble using those people for his own means - take what I brought up before about Sherlock believing he'd drugged Watson's coffee before locking him in a lab as an example.

Moriarty is a sociopath, yes, for sure. But that doesn't mean Sherlock isn't, at least in this particular adaptation anyway.


Lol he didn't even need to test Watson anyway. Didn't he test the coffee like 5 minutes later in the lab?

I was speaking specifically about his conversation with Moriarty in the final episode.

Was drugging Watson really that big a deal? I thought he did as a kind of practical joke. He seemed to be enjoying it :/



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

12 Jan 2012, 5:35 pm

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Lol he didn't even need to test Watson anyway. Didn't he test the coffee like 5 minutes later in the lab?


And he still did it anyway, which, if anything, proves my point.

Quote:
I was speaking specifically about his conversation with Moriarty in the final episode.


Why? Because Moriarty said it wasn't quite true he had no heart?

Quote:
Was drugging Watson really that big a deal? I thought he did as a kind of practical joke. He seemed to be enjoying it :/


If that's the case then it proves my point even further.



TheSunAlsoRises
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,039

12 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYlVBhwfvL4[/youtube]


TheSunAlsoRises



Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

12 Jan 2012, 8:51 pm

Already posted this today in another forum, but what the hell, it's funny:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmja0S6ZPxs[/youtube]



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

13 Jan 2012, 12:09 am

Asp-Z wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Lol he didn't even need to test Watson anyway. Didn't he test the coffee like 5 minutes later in the lab?


And he still did it anyway, which, if anything, proves my point.

Quote:
I was speaking specifically about his conversation with Moriarty in the final episode.


Why? Because Moriarty said it wasn't quite true he had no heart?

Quote:
Was drugging Watson really that big a deal? I thought he did as a kind of practical joke. He seemed to be enjoying it :/


If that's the case then it proves my point even further.


No. People pull practical jokes on each other all the time. And childishness is not uncommon with people with asperger's.

Also yes, partly because of Moriarty.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

13 Jan 2012, 5:54 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
No. People pull practical jokes on each other all the time. And childishness is not uncommon with people with asperger's.


You think drugging someone is a "practical joke"?

Quote:
Also yes, partly because of Moriarty.


Moriarty wants to manipulate Sherlock (as he does everyone), and he's the bad guy, you can't assume what he says to be truth.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

13 Jan 2012, 6:28 am

Asp-Z wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
No. People pull practical jokes on each other all the time. And childishness is not uncommon with people with asperger's.


You think drugging someone is a "practical joke"?

Quote:
Also yes, partly because of Moriarty.


Moriarty wants to manipulate Sherlock (as he does everyone), and he's the bad guy, you can't assume what he says to be truth.


Seen worse.

You can assume Moriarty is telling the truth because the two were being honest with each other. Giving each other compliments and all that. And if he was lying the whole statement was useless as a threat. And Sherlock didn't deny it.



Asp-Z
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,018

13 Jan 2012, 6:44 am

You have a point about Sherlock not denying it, but again, he cares for only two people. We're going around in circles here :lol:



faerie_queene87
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 162
Location: the TARDIS

13 Jan 2012, 7:30 am

Asp-Z wrote:
Quote:
Was drugging Watson really that big a deal? I thought he did as a kind of practical joke. He seemed to be enjoying it :/


If that's the case then it proves my point even further.


A bit of speculation: Sherlock "used" John to solve the case because that was the priority, but it was in laboratory conditions ( :lol: ) and he knew that John was not in danger at all, so nothing could have harmed him anyway.

To me, Sherlock looks more like he wants to be a sociopath (he did say that he wants to keep himself detached from feelings), rather than he actually is one.


_________________
At age 24, 4 months and 10 days I was officially told: "Congratulations! You are an Aspie".
Now I write about it --> http://happilyclueless.me


The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

13 Jan 2012, 9:01 am

Well technically it could have caused a lot of emotional trauma. He probably thought the dog was going to tear him apart right there.



Jory
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,520
Location: Tornado Alley

16 Jan 2012, 8:54 pm

Not many AS moments on last night's episode, but a few. In the opening scenes, Holmes is extremely awkward when accepting gifts, and Watson needs to point out sarcasm to him. If there were any more, I can't remember them. I was too enthralled with the drama. :)