slowmutant wrote:
You're suggesting that the people of New Orleans were too stupid to extricate themselves from the floodwaters? And you've got the f***ing gall to make fun of them? f**k you, my ampytated friend.
I'm suggesting nothing of the kind. Nor am I making fun of any New Orleanians. The "Eejitt-Speak" I presented is a closely para-phrased quote of what someone said to me when I asked him if he was ready for the
digital TV conversion.
However, there is no denying that some folks just don't believe it when they're warned about an impending disaster and don't believe in the need to act to avoid it while they're able to. Other examples:
- People that disregard "Safe Sex" warnings when they are at high risk for AIDS, and have unprotected sex with multiple partners.
- People that disregard the Surgeon General's warnings on tobacco use, and then smoke or dip freely.
- People that ignore the risks of a DUI conviction, and literally drive while drinking alcohol.
- People that ignore their physician's advice, and then go on to eat as much as they can while exercising as little as possible.
- People that keep rebuilding in areas prone to flood, wildfire, earthquake, landslide, hurricanes, and other natural disasters.
- And many others.
Therefore, I assert that there are also people that simply do not understand that the upcoming digital TV conversion is going to directly affect them, and that they will be in a state of denial long after the conversion takes effect.
We'll just have to wait for the evidence.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.