What is the worst movie you ever saw?
Dont recall Alphavile or Gemini - The Twin Stars either. Running Man (if you mean the Swarzenegger vehicle) was just big budget cheese. I liked the exploding collar idea, and given the current fad for reality shows, a remake might work quite well. If memory serves its based on a short story by Philip K Dick (Bladerunner)?
Pet Sematary falls foul of the same issue a lot of the 80s Stephen King films do.. they just arent up to the standard of the books at all. Though that film is singularly responsible for my wearing of high-topped combat boots for about 15 years. (Chiild, scalpel, achilles tendon.. OUCH.)
"Rocket to the Moon" (1967) was an unfunny comedy based on Jules Verne's novel "From the Earth to the Moon" which tried to cash in on the success of "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines" (which also starred Gert Fröbe). When the rocket took off, the movie ended. "Alphaville" by Jean-Luc Godard is said to be one of the best science-fiction movies ever, but I found it godawful. "Gemini - The Twin Stars" was a cheap Swiss production that never even made into the cinema. "The Running Man" was an inferior rip-off of the French movie "Le prix du danger" (1982) and would have been much better had it stuck to the Richard Bachman (aka Stephen King) novel it was supposedly based on. Like "2010: The Year We Make Contact", "Pet Sematary" was proof that writers should not turn their own novels into screenplays - they are so eager to please Hollywood that they throw out everything that was good about the novel.
Dont recall Alphavile or Gemini - The Twin Stars either. Running Man (if you mean the Swarzenegger vehicle) was just big budget cheese. I liked the exploding collar idea, and given the current fad for reality shows, a remake might work quite well. If memory serves its based on a short story by Philip K Dick (Bladerunner)?
Pet Sematary falls foul of the same issue a lot of the 80s Stephen King films do.. they just arent up to the standard of the books at all. Though that film is singularly responsible for my wearing of high-topped combat boots for about 15 years. (Chiild, scalpel, achilles tendon.. OUCH.)
"Rocket to the Moon" (1967) was an unfunny comedy based on Jules Verne's novel "From the Earth to the Moon" which tried to cash in on the success of "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines" (which also starred Gert Fröbe). When the rocket took off, the movie ended. "Alphaville" by Jean-Luc Godard is said to be one of the best science-fiction movies ever, but I found it godawful. "Gemini - The Twin Stars" was a cheap Swiss production that never even made into the cinema. "The Running Man" was an inferior rip-off of the French movie "Le prix du danger" (1982) and would have been much better had it stuck to the Richard Bachman (aka Stephen King) novel it was supposedly based on. Like "2010: The Year We Make Contact", "Pet Sematary" was proof that writers should not turn their own novels into screenplays - they are so eager to please Hollywood that they throw out everything that was good about the novel.
Ahh, I see. I knew Running Man was from a story.
From what I recall, Stephen King retains a great deal of executive control over films of his works. Some of the newer films have been much better than the earlier ones, so perhaps Mr King is getting the hang of what to keep and what to throw away. A lot of films from the 80s, especially Horror-style ones, suffered from the same problem though. The effects were never up to the standards of what your own imagination can throw at you. Most King films, Hellraiser, Elm Street, Halloween and Friday The !3th.. they all have that issue. They went for very up front monsters, which makes it easier to "see the wires". Compare this to say, Alien.. where the only real shot we get of the whole beast is at the end..and THEN it looks daft. Previous to that, its merely hints and flashes.. No wires. Aliens also manages this feat rather well, as with clever filming, the aliens seem much more lifelike. Then look at Alien3.. the creature looks shite, is shite, and we get to see all of it most of the time.
Consider "Dog Soldiers" as well. This uses a similar technique as Alien.. clever angles and limited visiblity. Without that talent, if you actually see the werewolves, they look like that comedy thing they had in one of the later Howling Movies.. the one with the circus. IE guy on stilts with fur.
This problem seems to be getting solved, as now film makers are getting over the amazing abuse of CGI, and starting to use it in a more subtle fashion. So, in your average "creature feature", even a low budget monster can be made to seem more lifelike. Combine clever use of CGI with clever use of angles, and you can get some genuinely good things going on.
Question is.. what is it that makes a movie "bad"? (other than having Colin farrel in it?) Someone mentioned Plan 9 from Outer Space earlier, and that is recognised as one of the worst movies ever made. Yet in some ways it is truly great. The biopic of the director.. Ed Wood (with Johnny Deppe) is genius though. (Its also the last film Bela Lugosi ever made, and he was dead for the greater part of the filming. If thats not clever filming, I dont know what is.)
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
Also, I think the entire Full Metal Jacket movie should've ended after Leonard killed himself.
The whole combat portion of the movie was gruesome and boring.
Tim
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
I walked out after about twenty minutes.
I still want to see the Larry the Cable Guy movie.
Tim
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Yes, I thought "Marie-Antoinette" was bad . It was just terminally dull. Perhaps that's the point , Coppola is into portraying terminal dullnesses; but " The Virgin Suicides" wasn't.
"Scoop" ABYSMAL, embarrassing , feeble dribblings.
"The Hills have Eyes" boring revolting offensive junk.
" Slevin" Didn't even make it to the end, not even to halfway.
Me too I can't think what the all time worst is, but these are JUST from this years viewing!
Then there's
" Amelie" and " The Lost City of Children" by same team ( or half of it). Didn't get past first 15 minutes of Amelie; was vomiting too much. I LOATHE. Gag gag regurge. Sickly . Repulsive syrup.
" The Village" like someone else said. I still love " Sixth Sense" and quite enjoy "invincible" ( english name?)BUT "the village" was so naive , and clunky and pseudo deep , and obvious, and non-credible , and ham acted , and patronising, that for a while I thought there must be more to it, something I hadn't got , even tho I had been VERY bored.
But one that left a horrible taste in my mouth , while thinking it was "serious art" ( I sometimes take a while to realise I've been conned ) , was " The Baby of Macon". Luckily I saw " The Piano" the next day and realised immediately where Greenaways rubbish had been most pretentious ; rape does not have quite the power over a woman's innermost being that Greenaways sentimental "horror" pretends. Destroying her creativity and means to express herself by chopping off a prime piano-playing finger ,yes, but not that parade of glorified abuse.
PS: can't agree about " American Beauty" . It was almost the first film in original version that I saw about 3 years after becoming a mother , and I came out of the cinema crying. I felt seen. Perhaps it works best for people who are parents and had post-natal deprssion and are feeling alone in a foreign country. But I still love it tho' no longer so convinced by any apparent depths. It's rare to see the americans shown in such a miserable way.
"Scoop" ABYSMAL, embarrassing , feeble dribblings.
"The Hills have Eyes" boring revolting offensive junk.
" Slevin" Didn't even make it to the end, not even to halfway.
Me too I can't think what the all time worst is, but these are JUST from this years viewing!
Then there's
" Amelie" and " The Lost City of Children" by same team ( or half of it). Didn't get past first 15 minutes of Amelie; was vomiting too much. I LOATHE. Gag gag regurge. Sickly . Repulsive syrup.
" The Village" like someone else said. I still love " Sixth Sense" and quite enjoy "invincible" ( english name?)BUT "the village" was so naive , and clunky and pseudo deep , and obvious, and non-credible , and ham acted , and patronising, that for a while I thought there must be more to it, something I hadn't got , even tho I had been VERY bored.
But one that left a horrible taste in my mouth , while thinking it was "serious art" ( I sometimes take a while to realise I've been conned ) , was " The Baby of Macon". Luckily I saw " The Piano" the next day and realised immediately where Greenaways rubbish had been most pretentious ; rape does not have quite the power over a woman's innermost being that Greenaways sentimental "horror" pretends. Destroying her creativity and means to express herself by chopping off a prime piano-playing finger ,yes, but not that parade of glorified abuse.
PS: can't agree about " American Beauty" . It was almost the first film in original version that I saw about 3 years after becoming a mother , and I came out of the cinema crying. I felt seen. Perhaps it works best for people who are parents and had post-natal deprssion and are feeling alone in a foreign country. But I still love it tho' no longer so convinced by any apparent depths. It's rare to see the americans shown in such a miserable way.
Most amusing part of The Vilage? "Those we do not speak of.." hom they speak about in almost EVERY SCENE. Made me giggle. Its like the Knights who say Ni scene.. transpose "It" with "Those we do not speak of" and its almost the same.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]
Boring movie,about French queen who was also bored.
Only exciting thing in entire movie is revolution that put the end to this boredom.
But since Sofia Coppola was director,I'm not surprised why is it sooooo boring.
Lets not forget her 'masterpiece' - Lost In Translation,a movie which was also so boring,that almost put me into sleep.
Boring as in not a lot of plot? Suits me. I hate films that consist of almost nothing but plot.
Marie Antoinette must be my least favourite film of hers, but I liked the other three. I think she's the director I can relate to most because her films do not try to impress, which is what I hate about most films. Films that try to please.
One of the best cases of this must be Three Musketeers. I thought the film was hilarious because it had absolutely no point. Just the kind of film that suits modern times. Blockbuster cinema.
_________________
EXPANDED CIRCLE OF FIFTHS
"It's how they see things. It's a way of bringing class to an environment, and I say that pejoratively because, obviously, good music is good music however it's created, however it's motivated." - Thomas Newman
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 74,022
Location: Portland, Oregon
I absolutely loathed the last "Twilight" film. It was boring and the plot, more than that of the films before that, was very... um... how to say it nicely? Controversial. ^^
I have seen quite a lot of really bad films. But most of the time I still find something to like about them.
I also didn't like the re-make of "The Day The Earth Stood Still". At all. Some films were bad enough for their official trailers alone.
I never watched all of "Pearl Harbor". The first 30 minutes were too dreadful. Omg, it was SO American. Not in a good way. It was... I can't even say anything nice about it. It was clearly 100% patriotic without any reflection. Sure enough, the real events were terrifying, but the way it was made into picture... just... ugh...
_________________
EXPANDED CIRCLE OF FIFTHS
"It's how they see things. It's a way of bringing class to an environment, and I say that pejoratively because, obviously, good music is good music however it's created, however it's motivated." - Thomas Newman
It does have a great soundtrack though
I disagree--I found nothing on the soundtrack appealing. But I have limited taste in music.
Not even My Bloody Valentine? Or The Jesus and Mary Chain? I love both bands endlessly.
(I loved everything about the film. I could write endless paragraphs why...)
Yeah, I know... I don't like most typecast actors. I don't like Vin Diesel either because he ONLY stars in movies that need testosterone.
Omg, I LOVE Hugh Grant. XD And I can totally understand why people hate him so much. I have interesting dilemmas, I know. ^^

_________________
EXPANDED CIRCLE OF FIFTHS
"It's how they see things. It's a way of bringing class to an environment, and I say that pejoratively because, obviously, good music is good music however it's created, however it's motivated." - Thomas Newman
Shoot 'Em Up and Wanted. I cannot stand these movies!
I've been shooting guns as long as I can remember. I LOVE targetshooting as a sport. I got my sharpshooter certification in the airforce.
I know they're movies, but I can't stand the things they do with guns in these movies! (curving bullets ect....)
_________________
Standing on the fringes of life... offers a unique perspective. But there comes a time to see what it looks like from the dance floor.
---- Stephen Chbosky
ASD Diagnosis on 7-17-14
My Tumblr: http://jetbuilder.tumblr.com/
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Worst restaurants |
15 Jun 2025, 4:25 pm |
Sinners, a Great Vampire Movie |
16 Jul 2025, 4:44 am |