KyushuFez wrote:
Yeah I read the book first too. I read it when I heard they were going to make a movie out of it, and when I finished I thought 'how the bloody hell could you make that into a movie?' But I think Linklater did a really good job. I think the rotoscoping technique was a really good idea - makes you 'detached' from reality. I think the first couple of times I watched it, I missed a couple of key things - but the last time I watched it, it seemed to make more sense. Plus how good was Robert Downey Jr in it?
Downey steals every scene he's in no matter what movie it is. Perfect casting for that character. I did notice some flaws in the film the second time I watched it. The ending doesn't feel nearly as tragic as it should because Keanu Reeves simply isn't a good enough actor to convey how utterly destroyed Bob Arctor's brain has become through drug use, since he seems nearly braindead from the beginning like he usually does in films.
As for the book, it makes more sense than the film simply because there's more explanation that spells everything out for the reader, but it's not exactly Dick's most accessible book to begin with. I once recommended it to someone and he gave up after a few chapters, but he reacted much better to Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and Ubik.