SO MUCH BATMAN

Post Reply New Topic

Batshit, i think you have a point. Everyone will think of James Bond as the dashing secret agent who beats the bad guys and gets the girl, even the Bond franchise has had incredible highs (Goldfinger, Live and Let Die, Goldeneye), and lows (View to a Kill, Die Another Day). Even Brosnan became cheesy after skysurfing, an invisible car and a villian with diamonds in his face.

AA's plot was written by Paul Dini, while it's not his best, AA was the best game of last year. And i have faith that Batman 3 will deliver.

just because the new films are faithful to the comics it does not automaticly make them good.

I think most of the people who saw TDK were comic book fans not film addicts.

Seriously thought WHAT IS SO GREAT ABOUT TDK?

you know what jamesy your new name is meg. now i have to tell you something......

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Gnc5vU2YFk[/youtube]

Heath Ledgers performance was good but I would not call it 'electrifying'

Humour? TDK is probably the least funny film I have ever seen in my life.

Interigation scene was quite good becasue of heath ledgers acting

The opening bank heist was just weird and made no sense with no special effects or sound.

"Why so serious" was pointless dialouge that was repeated

Humour from Mr J and Alfred? If you call it corny and bad acting from Michael Caine and Bale being an emotinally cold wooden robot. Bale put no humour into the dark knight and was just acting like the grim reaper for the entire film.

Harvey dents protryal of two face was critcisized by reviewers as making no sense and being too random switching from good guy to bad guy at the drop of a hat. Tommy Lee Jones Two face was a lot more entertaining.

Batman pushed to his breaking point? If by that you mean he put not charisma into the character. Heath Ledger defenintly stole the spotlight from batman in this film.

Again why do we need a batman film to tell us about crime and terror? Leave that for the documentaries like Farenhite 9/11 or No Country for Old Men this is a f*****g batman film for gods sake.

Its a medicore film at best without heath ledger and at the end of the day its heath ledgers show.

"Heath Ledgers performance was good but I would not call it 'electrifying'"
it was really good. he was much better than carrey. FYI he won an oscar for his performance

"Humour? TDK is probably the least funny film I have ever seen in my life."
there are a few really funny parts:
1. "i'm not wearing hockey pads"
2. the pencil trick
3. michael caine
4. morgan freeman

"Interigation scene was quite good becasue of heath ledgers acting"
exactly

"The opening bank heist was just weird and made no sense with no special effects or sound."
it was to set the mood of the joker. it is SUPPOSED to make no sense. also, it is better without stupid special effects

"Why so serious" was pointless dialouge that was repeated"
so what. there was tons of pointless dialouge in batman forever

"Humour from Mr J and Alfred? If you call it corny and bad acting from Michael Caine and Bale being an emotinally cold wooden robot. Bale put no humour into the dark knight and was just acting like the grim reaper for the entire film."
#1. michael caine was hilarious. also, i thought you liked corny acting
#2. batman is SUPPOSED to be emotionally distant

"Harvey dents protryal of two face was critcisized by reviewers as making no sense and being too random switching from good guy to bad guy at the drop of a hat. Tommy Lee Jones Two face was a lot more entertaining."
#1. by 'reviewers' you mean you
#2. that's what happens in the comics. harvey dent had psychological problems that he was holding back for years. when he got burnt and his life got destroyed, his other personality became dominant.
#3. tommy lee jones was horrendous as two-face. he was not entertaining, he was annoying.

"Batman pushed to his breaking point? If by that you mean he put not charisma into the character. Heath Ledger defenintly stole the spotlight from batman in this film."
#1. batman was pushed to his breaking point because joker was making it difficult for him not to kill him.
#2. joker steals the show in practically every adaption of batman. TAS, 89, etc.

"Again why do we need a batman film to tell us about crime and terror? Leave that for the documentaries like Farenhite 9/11 or No Country for Old Men this is a f***ing batman film for gods sake."
that's what happens in the comics. your ignorance of comics is really making you look stupid.

"Its a medicore film at best without heath ledger and at the end of the day its heath ledgers show."
that is only your opinion. and i don't really care. if i bashed james bond, no james bond fan would care because my opinion wouldn't matter to them. we batman fans do not care about your opinion. it does not matter to us

So are you guys saying I am imature just because I don't like Nolans bat films?

Excuse me in August when I made my first thread about batman i was not the one being all agressive. Remember Xenus childlike outburst when he saw my posts for the first time?

still no excuse to fly of the handle and get all beligerant. If you want to pop off at me do it to my face and before you know it you will be in the hospital, instead of hiding behind a computer. Keyboard mafia.

Why do you come to that assumption?

how do you know you can beat me up?

this conversation is getting stupid.

More importantly even if i was talking about a topic i had no knowledge about that does not mean xenu has to react like a child and rant at me on this forum.

Your pathetic as well saying i have no knowledge about batman when i do. In August you and Xenu were the ones behaving anti socially on these forums. Weird how almost everyone esle were behaving like human beings and you guys acted all over the top. Again comic book fans who take the films and batman in general far too seriously.