Jamesy wrote:
Well Batman Forever offers you something the Dark Knight can't ESCAPISIM.
no it is not. also, batman isn't about escapism
Jamesy wrote:
And to be honest what made Batman Forever so fun and timeless was its humour and the cheesy aspect.
Batman Forever isn't timeless. Also, most people, myself included, HATE the humor and camp value.
Jamesy wrote:
In my opinion Batman Forever is far better than the Dark Knight. At least in batman forever harvery den't is actually a belivable villian.
Two-Face's makeup in Forever is fake and stupid. Also, he laughs too much. Forever's Two-Face keeps flipping until he gets what result he wants. Dark Knight's two-face looks scary. Two-Face in Dark Knight, also in the comics, flips the coin once, gets the result, and proceeds with the action (heads=good, tails=bad), never questioning it
Jamesy wrote:
To be honest Batman Forever made me laugh more than the Dark Knight and Batman Begins and overall I enjoyed it a lot more.
Batman is not about comedy
Jamesy wrote:
I for one don't care that much about batmans past.
the film is called Batman
BEGINS!! !! ! READ THE DAMN TITLE!! !! !
Jamesy wrote:
So what if I enjoy Schumaers sh** fest that Batman Forever?
I don't care if you do. But the fact that you keeps saying Batman Forever is better than The dark Knight really irritates me
Jamesy wrote:
I am sure I am not the only one?
I am sure you are the only one
Jamesy wrote:
NOT TO MENTION THE ACTING WAS BETTER IN BATMAN FOREVER.
no, the acting was FAR better in The Dark Knight (especially from heath ledger). The acting in Batman Forever is attrocious (especially from chris o'donnell)
I'm beginning to suspect that you are a troll. no one can say things THIS idiotic
Last edited by imbatshitcrazy on 16 Aug 2010, 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.