ouinon wrote:
This has got me thinking; why don't I like Nolan's Batmans?
And am wondering whether the reason why Burton's camped up excess worked so well is because the original stories were comics, ... it's why "comic book" is used as an adjective for exaggerated, cartoonish, simplistic, etc, because the medium itself is a "not serious one" ( however cult and "taken seriously" it has since become ); it was something "throwaway", ... "pulp fiction" in fact.
You could tell the darkest, most tragic, awful stories in a comic book, ... and it was still a comic book ... the medium is part of the message, part of the story itself. So Burton, making a film of the stories, replaced the "comic book" frame/context with camp and colour and grotesque ridiculousness, caricature, etc. And it worked.
What's odd is that Nolan is so into models of reality, the layers and levels of truths etc that we surround ourself with and are surrounded by, and yet he missed out that "layer", the original layer surrounding the Batman story, which was the "comic book". It's interesting.
.
Thank you Ouinon interesting thoughts. I like Returns for the catwoman story and character, begins for the going around the world training, (i reltated to that i as i needed to get away and change myself) and DK for the anarchist joker. at least i heard he was meant to be anarchist.