pastafarian wrote:
I really like John Watson too, I dont know how good Watson is in films or books, but they have made him meaty, complex, heroic and much funnier than Sherlock.
Watson in the books is boring. I'm sure a lot of my fellow hardcore fans would want my head on a stake for saying that, but it's true. He's not really meant to be a three dimensional character, just a window into which we view Holmes. When filmmakers use Watson exactly the way he's written, it makes for a boring movie. He needs to be more fleshed out in movies to be interesting.
Some movies handle this well and some don't. I've seen a lot of films in which he just stands around being useless, wondering why he's even there. Some movies, like the 1939-1946 films with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, turn him into a bumbling old fool. It pisses off the purists, but at least he has some personality that way. More recent films have made the relationship between Holmes and Watson more antagonistic, turning them into what's basically a bickering married couple. Purists complain like they always do, but it makes for good drama on the screen.
Martin Freeman is one of the better Watsons I've seen. If I had to make a list of the best, I would choose Nigel Bruce, Ian Hart, Jude Law, and Freeman.