17 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm
robsten1990
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 71
Location: Sweden
17 Feb 2013, 3:42 pm
AnonymousAnonymous
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 76,306
Location: Portland, Oregon
18 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
19 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
19 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
19 Feb 2013, 8:12 am
Lincoln (2012) - better than the Lincoln fighting vampires movie
I absolutely agree with you, Stalk.
My fingers are crossed that Daniel-Day Lewis wins Best Actor
and Steven Spielberg wins Best Director on February 24th at the Oscars.
IMOO, could Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter have been a much better movie had the studio given screenwriting duties to another, more experienced screenwriter? It's hard to determine that, even if an early draft of the script ends up on the Internet.
I would hope so too. He definitely made the role he played, believable.
About Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (2012), I guess it was meant for a different type of audience, maybe along the lines of girls who have a crush on the Actors.
19 Feb 2013, 3:38 pm
19 Feb 2013, 7:42 pm
Saw Wreck it Ralph today and found it extremely fun and enjoyable.
Saw the trailer for Monsters University managed to make me laugh really want to see it when it comes out. Looks hilarious 
20 Feb 2013, 2:52 pm
A great film but, a sad ending in that M-portrayed by Judi Dench died yet, the role of that character was carried on by Ralph Fiennes.. 
MakaylaTheAspie
Veteran
Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Age: 30
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 14,565
Location: O'er the land of the so-called free and the home of the self-proclaimed brave. (Oregon)
20 Feb 2013, 3:06 pm
20 Feb 2013, 3:32 pm
20 Feb 2013, 6:13 pm
21 Feb 2013, 1:38 am
21 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
21 Feb 2013, 9:21 am
Die Hard 5 and I was completely disappointed. I dont want to get rude, but I could as well have studied a dog poop 90 minutes long. 
I didnt even have that high expectations, I mean die hard is no deep psychology, but the films before were well done action movies. But the fifth part was boring as hell. No story, no characters you were interested in, no jokes, completely dumb action scenes... Its as if the makers had told themself: "Ok, Bruce Willis gets to old, and we must produce a film in which he can present his heir, before he gets serious to old." It was just bad.
21 Feb 2013, 10:08 am
I didnt even have that high expectations, I mean die hard is no deep psychology, but the films before were well done action movies. But the fifth part was boring as hell. No story, no characters you were interested in, no jokes, completely dumb action scenes... Its as if the makers had told themself: "Ok, Bruce Willis gets to old, and we must produce a film in which he can present his heir, before he gets serious to old." It was just bad.
I saw it too and did like it. It wasn't oscar materal though. I read that the first one is the best one. I never saw the other ones so I can't compare. Probably if I did, then I too would be disappointed like you.
